Reviews

1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
One of the Worst Sequels -- Ever
20 August 2011
Sequels are difficult. In many cases, it's just impossible to catch the lightning in the bottle the second time, no matter how hard they try. In this case, it looked like they plain flat mailed it in, hoping that everyone who loved the original Arthur would flock to the theaters to see this mess. The only motivation I could see for this movie was to make more money. Every aspect of the film was embarrassingly bad. We watched the 2011 Arthur (quite good in its own interpretation of the story), the original Arthur, and then this during one sitting. This was so bad we couldn't finish the viewing. Obviously money can be more important than pride.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed