Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Split (IX) (2016)
5/10
Conflict of interests
28 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, this one is difficult for me. On the one hand, my favourite classic gothic tale of all time is The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll & Mr Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson, and I could definitely see some influence in Split. But then again, this is M. Night Shyamalan, and I know that while he can get the ball rolling when it comes to storytelling, he is almost physically incapable of sticking the landing. In the end, I decided to watch this movie because I has been curious about James McAvoy's take on the character(s).

In this one respect, I was far from disappointed. McAvoy is a brilliant actor, and he pulled off not only all the various characters so that they were believable and distinctive, but he especially excelled in transitions between them. His performance was strong and seemingly effortless, and, as usual, his biggest forte was the non-verbal part of acting (gestures, posture, facial expressions).

I also think that Anya Taylor-Joy did a great job. I appreciate that this was not "just" another typical hostage character, and in my opinion, she delivered beautifully.

As I said before, there were aspects of the movie that really worked for me. I liked the pacing, the lack of physical violence or graphic content which seems to be the staple of thriller/horror movies of this kind. Altogether, the film would have probably been good enough for me...

BUT:

1. Editing in this thing was awful. We were jumping in and out of scenes abruptly without any apparent reason. It was very distracting and kept pulling me out of the story.

2. Even though I had an idea about the way the story would go towards the end, it did not make it any less nonsensical and almost cartoonishly ridiculous. Personally, I feel there is always a line between realism and fantasy, and even though I love both genres, once this line gets crossed, my mind instinctively recoils. This happened when the Beast was presented. Yes, mind over matter is a powerful message, but there are physical limitations to this. Had this been a fantastical story, I would have been okay with it, but if you set a story within our world as we know it, no one should be able to simply walk off shotgun wounds. Also, I found it completely unnecessary because the Beast letting Casey go based on her scars would have followed the logic of the story well enough. To me, the whole supernatural angle undermined and cheapened the overall story.

3. The thing that bothered me the most, however, was the psychiatrist. How was this quack ever allowed anywhere near patients?! She deliberately ignored signs, completely dismissed quite a dramatic change, presumed she could impose intimacy on a personality she had not met before, and never even thought about involving the police.

Overall, I am quite torn about this film. I expected I would either hate it or that it would pleasantly surprise me. Instead, I got an even worse outcome. I feel it could have been decent, if only...

Given a better screenplay and different editing, it could have been a good standalone movie. But the compromises made in order to set it up for a supernatural "universe" took away too much of the storyline in service of the box office, and that, for me, is always going to be a dealbreaker.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dracula (2020)
2/10
Cheap, vulgar, insipid - a complete letdown
2 January 2020
I am SO disappointed. I love the Moffat & Gatiss duo and I have been looking forward to this one for a long time. I have either become accustomed to a very different standard from these two, or they have used up all their tricks on Sherlock. The first episode is overly graphic and at times downright vulgar and cheap-looking, and the language is far too contemporary for a period piece. However, the main problem lies with the run time and the screenplay (or rather the absence of one). The scenes are dragging for much longer than necessary, and altogether it feels like the plot is spread way too thin which results in boredom mixed with disgust. So far, it feels flat and unimaginative, and frankly, it does not fit into any genre whatsoever. It´s too predictable and boring for a horror, too inconsistent for a period drama, and far too slow and empty for a decent comedy. I will give it one more chance tomorrow, out of respect for the writers´ earlier work. I genuinely wanted to love it and I hope it can be saved, but for now, it´s a waste of time.
48 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
If you read the book, DO NOT come near this thing...
22 March 2015
Upon seeing the trailer for Insurgent, I knew straight away the film will be different from the book and I was okay with it. If I had known just how much did they butcher the book, there would not have been a power on Earth strong enough to make me cough up the money for the ticket.

I cannot even begin to list everything wrong with this movie but I will do my best to point out the highlights:

The performances. There is a reason why I gave 3 stars. One is for Miles Teller. He is the only bright spot in the entire mess. He is witty, funny, quick and sharp. The other star is for Shailene Woodley. Her performance was nowhere near to what she is capable of but I think she did the best she could with the little she got. The rest of the cast was a nightmare. Theo James was so wooden he might just as well not be in the movie at all. Octavia Spencer did not get enough space to introduce herself properly, let alone show off her talent and whoever cast Naomi Watts must have been drunk out of his senses. She is a decent actress but she looked like Four's ex- wife, not his mother. Even Kate Winslet was repetitive and uninteresting. The writers made both Jeanine and Evelyn into one-dimensional clichés and took away anything interesting about them.

The story. The person who wrote the script clearly holds no respect for the author's work or the fans. There are whole scenes that were not in the book and the scenes and dialogues crucial for both the plot and character development are not altered - they are missing altogether. You cannot even recognise Tris from the book. Her feeling of guilt is spoken of to the point where it bothers you because she becomes whiny and self-absorbed, yet she runs around firing a gun at anything that moves. She is presented as the typical "chosen one" you have seen a thousand times before and there is nothing original about her journey anymore.

The only thing I have to applaud are the effects (the reason for the third star). They are truly stunning, even though the are deliberately paraded in the scenes that are made out of (extremely) thin air. The use of special effects is a tricky thing. If the story is great, you do not need a lot of them, just enough to create the environment and underline the story. However, if there is such a severe lack of originality in the screenplay as you can observe here, you notice the precise amount and nature of visual wonders and yet they do nothing to improve the overall impression which in this case is that I could have been doing literally anything else and it would not have been such a huge waste of time.

I do not normally post reviews because they reflect my own opinion but in this case I felt obliged to save someone the pain of seeing their beloved book torn to pieces and prostituted for profit. Seriously, save yourself the pain. I cannot, so I am hoping for amnesia...
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Downton Abbey (2010–2015)
9/10
The difference between cliché and classic is in details...
21 September 2012
...and this show is the perfect example. I managed to watch both seasons in just 2 days. It was like reading a good book, I just couldn't put down my laptop :) I am doing the second round right now, taking it slower and enjoying it minute by minute.

I have to start by pointing out that the writing is not perfect. The plot is not exactly new, you may have seen or read something similar a thousand times before. The lack of originality in writing is usually a deal-breaker for me but in this case, I must say that I am astonished by how much I like this particular show. I believe there are several factors responsible for that.

Firstly, there's the acting. The characters in the show may seem kind of black & white at first but as the story continues and plot unravels, you realise there's more than meets the eye to everyone involved. The actors are doing superb job peeling of the layers and showing the viewer what's hidden underneath. Also, I feel it's very simple to connect with the characters, there are those you instantly like and root for and those you're almost allergic to but even they may surprise you and make you question your point of view.

Second element that puts this show on the top is its visual side. The costumes are highly detailed and altogether breathtaking. I don't remember when was the last time I was so inspired, the fashion of the era was so beautiful and the show displays it in all its glory. I also enjoy the environment of Downton. The show was shot in a real location and it's not just another piece of studio work that makes you claustrophobic. You get the sense of real space in every scene, every shot, which is so rare these days with most of movies and TV shows using computer technology all the time.

The last thing I feel I have to mention is the music. The scoring in Downton Abbey is very delicate and yet very powerful. It perfectly underlines the story.

In conclusion, I cannot say there's no place for criticism and improvement in Downton Abbey but despite its insufficiencies it's still one of the best shows on television these days because it stays true to certain standards that we might have forgotten lately and I am truly thankful for such a beautiful reminder...
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rock of Ages (2012)
6/10
A bit disappointing :(
22 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I believe there are 2 types of people - those who love musicals and those who hate them. I belong to the first category. I enjoy musicals for the same reason as comic book based movies - they're not very deep and don't exactly scream Oscar but it's usually great relax and sheer fun. However, I was quite disappointed. Maybe it's because I was looking forward to this one for too long or (more likely) because I've seen it on West End last week and boy, it's a big difference!

The musical is one of the tackiest things I have ever seen but it's irresistibly charming. It's ridiculously funny and brilliantly dynamic. There's not a lot of talking but the numbers are fantastic and they let you in on everything you need to know. Also, the cast is unbelievable. The whole thing makes you laugh like crazy, jump up and sing along until the very end.

The movie version is not a complete waste of time BUT there's a lot of blind spots, the scenes are not properly connected. The jokes are very rare and sort of obvious, I'm sure there is more clever way to do a script. My biggest issue with the movie though was the alternative ending. One of the reasons I like this musical is that although there is a happy ending, it's a little more realistic one that you'd expect. In the movie they pulled on of the most nauseatingly American corny climaxes of all time and that just pushed the whole thing over the top.

If I sum it up, it's an enjoyable summer flick but not something I would want to see again. What a shame...
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Nanny (1993–1999)
10/10
Instant classic
3 June 2012
I just love this show. I used to watch it on TV quite a few years ago but when I returned to it lately I enjoyed it just as much and I have to say it's still one of the best comedy series I have ever seen. It's classic 90's sitcom and it has everything a great TV show should have. The chemistry between main characters is incredible, it turns otherwise sappy romantic plot into much more entertaining piece of television. One of the best things about the show is the relationship between supporting characters CC and Niles - the dynamics is perfect and the jokes are fantastic, they always catch me unprepared and make me laugh like crazy :) Much better that most of shows you find on TV today, you just have to have a certain amount of nostalgia in yourself to fully enjoy it. I know I do.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Understated elegance
12 May 2012
Some people reviewed this movie as too simple, too predictable. I must admit - I initially decided to watch it only for Joshua Jackson (I also thought it would not be more than 5/10). But I was very surprised. Personally, I love the feeling when you're going to watch a movie you know very little about and don't expect much from and then, halfway through it, you know you've found a little jewel. Not too shiny, not too loud, just a simple, elegant masterpiece. This is how I felt watching this film. Yes, it's a bit predictable but that doesn't change the fact that thoughts in the script are beautiful and universally true, the acting is easy and unforced and the scenery is breathtaking. The time passes very slowly and you get the feeling you're on vacation in Tuscany along with he characters, just sitting on a bench or taking a stroll through the fields... If you're a fan of Ridley Scott's Good Year, I'm sure you're going to love this movie as much as I did. Bon voyage!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Angel (2007)
10/10
Pure excellence
27 July 2011
I have to say that after I started to watch this movie I was not sure whether I would be able to finish it. The heroine is so unlikeable to me at first, she is completely detached from the reality. But as I got through the first half-hour, I must say that this is a brilliant movie that touched me to my very core. In a sense it is like 8 femmes - you see only blue skies and you do not realise something is wrong at first but you have this creepy feeling all the time (it cannot go on like that forever, right?). And before you know it, there is a storm so strong that you can barely keep up and the whole perfect world falls apart like the house of cards. I must especially point out the performances by Romola Garai and Michael Fassbender who did an AMAZING job but it would not feel right to leave out all the other supporting actors who made the story complete - Sam Neill and Lucy Russell. This movie reminds me of the Wurthering Heights by Emily Bronte and has everything I seek in a film - bunch of extremely talented people working together with absolute precision, marvelous costume and stages and above all - very deep idea that sticks with you even after the final credits are rolled and makes you think how tricky the life can be... Brava!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed