Part way through this film, the two main characters, who apparently just met, start acting as if they've been married for fifteen years. This was confusing and distracting--I spent the rest of the time trying to find clues for a resolution to this and consequently missed any meaning in the dialog between the two characters. Perhaps if I watched the film again knowing that no such resolution is coming I would listen to the dialog better, but in fact there is nothing there (concerning the relationship between men and women) that hasn't been said before and better.
Juliette Binoche won the Best Actress award for this role, but she deserves an award for most roles she has had (what about 'Bleu'?), so why this one? In the scene where the main characters are discussing the statue in the piazza, one of them says that it's not the technique of the artist that counts but the meaning of the work. If that is true, then this film comes up wanting regardless of any technical merits.
Juliette Binoche won the Best Actress award for this role, but she deserves an award for most roles she has had (what about 'Bleu'?), so why this one? In the scene where the main characters are discussing the statue in the piazza, one of them says that it's not the technique of the artist that counts but the meaning of the work. If that is true, then this film comes up wanting regardless of any technical merits.
Tell Your Friends