Change Your Image
iacon6
Reviews
A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
Where is Robert Englund when you need him?
What a joke of a film. I had free tickets for this movie. I love the original "Nightmare" and even though I was very skeptical about this re-make, I decided to give it a chance. What a waste of time. Hey Michael Bay, I want my 2 hours back! You douche, everything that you touch is crap!
Was this a nightmare movie? No it was some cheap imitation for a classic horror masterpiece. The new Freddy is not scary, he is not hellish, he is not the demon that the Elm kids are afraid of. In other words, the new Freddy doesn't fill the shoes, sweater, fedora and GLOVE that Englund left in the boiler room. Speaking of the glove, the new glove looks stupid and not as scary as the original one. During the film I was wishing for a scene in which the original Freddy pops out and slashes the new retarded version of himself.
Don't waste your time and money people. You want to see it? wait till it hits the DVD rack and even then it doesn't worth buying, just rent it or something.
The Crimson Mask (2009)
Was this a movie ???
I just saw this movie in the IndieFest USA 2009 festival in Anaheim. This review does not include spoilers, only my opinion on this movie.
First of all I want to tell the film maker: Dude, what the hell was that ? You call this a film ? I saw you in indiefest and I didn't want to tell you what I thought of the film in front of all the people. If you ever went to film school, you should go back and re-take all your classes cause your film making skills suck big time. One can't even call this a movie. Just a bunch of unrelated shots and scenes in order to deliver a stupid story.
It was my ever first time in life that I wanted to scream "rape" in a movie theater just to stop the screening and tell everyone that this film is raping my brain cells. It was my first time ever that I wished I had forks so I can shove them into my eyes because this film is HORRIBLE and I don't have enough words to describe how bad it is.
Usually the best part in bad films are the rolling end credits but in this case even the credits were 6 min. long.... C'mon.... The film maker even screwed the end titles by showing a very slow titles that didn't even had the right video field to them and were blurry as hell.
I only wish that IMDb had a 0/10 but it doesn't so I gave this film 1/10.
Story : 2/10 - I see what you were going after but you ruined the entire story.
Acting: 1/10 - Not even going to comment on that.
Cinematography: 0/10 - A blind man with Parkinson could have done a better job.
Directing: 0/10 - don't make me laugh. This un-matched puzzle you call a film is a total FAIL.
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)
Excellent!
Nobody cares what you think. This is an awesome movie that I went to see over and over again! If you are so disappointed, go see the horrible Bay-formers and STFU. This is the best film of the summer and I guess that you don't understand how they translate an almost 652 pages book into a 2.5 hours of a brilliant film. Do you think you can make it better ? You think you have what it takes to make a harry potter film ? Well I don't know who you are, but something tells me that you can't! You are just a whiny fan boy who wants to hate everything they make. There were certain parts that I also wished they would include from the book, but they didn't and it was yet the second best Hp film. The best one so far was "The order of the Phoenix". Besides nobody cares what people in India think.
Nuff' said!