Change Your Image
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjQ4MTY5NzU2M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDc5NTgwMTI@._V1_SY100_SX100_.jpg)
veronicabrown93
Reviews
The Walking Dead: For Blood (2021)
Slowly suffocating
I agree with all the negative reviews more than the positive. Especially the one from @paulaburr nailed it to me.
The final season should start to give us some answers. Instead of planning 168 spin offs. This is like a small creek silently flowing into the ocean and no one will care about anything anymore. Instead of putting all efforts in a proper story and give people actual answers about what happened to the show's lead character Rick Grimes.
I don't care about any character who appeared after season 8 or something. Why would I want to watch Yumiko doing anything. Or the numb girl being in a random place with an even more random guy and a bunch of Tarzans?
Why would I feel frightened about any person in the commonwealth? Why would I care about Leah who is a random pop up of a character that was already random in her origins episode?
Instead of going back to the shows roots.
It is so generic and boring. Why is Lydia still alive ? Who needs her ?
Ezekiel ? He is just a waste of money too. This show has always been full of flaws. Yeah. Let's have a cgi tiger and then kill him off, because we noticed it is actually work to have it all the time.
Let's have a bad guy (Negan) and have him chased for 20 years, with no real payoff. Let's squeeze the tube really hard.
How about a mission in the city or something or just Rick showing up again and bringing back some real horror and action ?
The dialogues are horrible, the acting is soap opera like and the settings uninspired.
People are watching this for 11 years now and you couldn't come up with more than THAT ?
This is a poor ending for that show. I know it's not the actual finale. I had hopes for that season. But no. They rather have fake raters and fool the audience until the end.
I feel like there are only like 200 people left watching that show.
And yeah, Daryl being captured for the 50est time. Wow. They should do bondage with him to at least at something new to it.
It is as if 12 year olds write the plays for that.
I hope Darabont himself will do a reboot some day.
Sad sad sad. :(
The Walking Dead (2010)
Sinking ship full of people looking for tacos
This show went from something that was great over to a bunch of people looking for food all the time and walking through woods. They have meetings and talk about what ? 'We need food'. Bla bla. They should all be super fat.
What an empty vehicle that show has become. Beyond comprehension. Why is anyone doing what they do ? I really don't get it. Listening to Kang afterwards makes me constantly angry. When she explains all her little ideas. What she talks about should be maybe 10% of the actual content. Some things are nice ideas, but it's not a flagship. How can anyone at AMC keep going like that ?
You seriously established Leah as a character, suggesting us to care about, because she had one episode with Daryl 50 years ago, which was already back then pure nonsense. It was trying out if people would like to see Daryl encountering someone and have a romantic thing.
And now you take that and set it up as one of the main themes of the shows final ? Are you okay ?!
Bro..
So it's food, unimportant characters, woods, no plot and rain.
That's it. What could we write now ? Oh yeah, I know. You know what would be super cool ? If it rains O.o
People looking for burgers and rain.
Thanks AMC and Kang. You should all reconsider your careers. The 5 remaining stars are for the great start and the kind of okay first 6 seasons. I will miss that show and always be sad for it.
River (2021)
The critics are right, sadly
I happened to see the directors instagram story, that apparently someone has been trolling her and her film, so I decided to give her film a chance, since I'm a filmoholic like forever. And even though I think, that the trolling itself is something really obnoxious, I have to come to the conclusion, that her film is unfortunately really as bad as it's critics. I think it's difficult here to reduce that and put that in the light of a gender discussion. We've had female filmmakers. We've had Bigelow, Agnes Varda, we have Greta Gerwig, we have Sofia Coppola and we have Claire Denis just to mention a few. The world doesn't necessarily need Emily Skye so far. And for sure not her film. I think these about 50 reviews do not seem like a fake or trolling. I think for a debut and a film that is featured on amazon and Apple TV it is probably a fair number. Maybe her next efforts will be better, but this one is clearly a film to avoid watching. If you read the critics reviews from websites outside imdb the reviews are pretty much the same. No troll around, just a bad film. Just go to rotten tomatoes or letterboxd. It is the same. Rotten Tomatoes has 5 reviews, 4 of them are saying basically that it's a bad film. Actual critics. At some point you gotta accept when your work wasn't as good as you expected. Time to face it not finding excusing or say it's because a woman made it. That's ridiculous.