Change Your Image
cmto
Reviews
The Family Stone (2005)
Utterly appalling
Unlikeable film clearly made by unlikeable people.
The barrage of "political correctness" in the opening scenes is laughable, cringe-making and an insult to anyone intelligent - as is the predictable political bias. I didn't watch past the first fifteen minutes - I didn't need to.
Only in the left-wing monopoly that is modern cinema are "liberals" permanently humane and likable and "Conservatives" are always "uptight" (whatever that means) and wrong and in a minority.
Those of us who are neither? We are objective enough to say this film is garbage.
Nasty garbage too.
Pride (2007)
Nothing new
Yet another White-bashing (using blacks, again) movie - the same movie you've already seen dozens of times rehashed yet again.
What's more to say? Certainly, to say "movies like this are low-rated because they cater to African-Americans" is utterly ludicrous. That some people believe they can put an anti-black spin on an overtly anti-White film shows that they believe they can spin anything.
That said, the fact that it is low-rated proves these films are not popular, so why are they being made? Obviously it can't be for money.
There really is no need for anyone to watch this film. Neither is there any need for films like these to be made anymore. It is repetition. It is propaganda.
9/27 people have the brains to think for themselves. That is heartening.
Wondrous Oblivion (2003)
Censorship on IMDb
I hadn't been back to this site since I posted my original comment, which was a while ago. Now I return and find my post has been removed and IMDb didn't even bother to notify me.
No doubt my comment was "flagged" as "inappropriate" or somesuch. If so, then what nonsense. It's clear that the pompous people using terms such as "narrow-minded" and "bigoted" are afflicted with these traits themselves. It seems that an already near-complete monopoly of the old media by the political "left" is not enough, they have to censor the internet as well.
No matter. I'm experience with left-wing hypocrisy and the fact that they are guilty of what they accuse; also that they don't have the self-awareness to realise this about themselves - or perhaps they're just arrogant.
If my initial comment on this film was removed due to anyone labelling it "racist" than that's not only pathetic but the opposite of the truth - my comments were ANTI-racist as I was criticising the constant depiction of white people and only white people as "evil racists". It's racial stigmatisation. Are the worlds' white peoples supposed to meekly accept being constantly singled out for demonisation by Big Media? Apparently so.
On a final note, the left's media monopoly and active censorship is not only hypocrisy but an admission of failure. Failure to hold audience interest by merit and an admission that the (potential and suppressed) competition is better.
0/1? I bet the user who did that is the one who reported my initial comment and it didn't take me long to work out the why and who. All I'll say at this juncture is that is typical of your kind. How the world was conned by the left's "free speech/expression" stance in the 1960's. Now they are in charge and applying the very thing they feigned to protest against.