Change Your Image
Sodie
Reviews
Rollover (1981)
A Marxist interpretation.
Maltin's summary of the film is idiotic. Clearly a case of 'saw the film, didn't understand it, decided to bash it.' That's his loss. Anyone who's ever read 'Das Kapital,' Marx's massive 3-volume (he died before completing the last volume, but it still got up to be around 1,000 pages) masterpiece would immediately recognize in 'Rollover' Marx's assertion that the capitalist system is doomed to self-destruct. That by its very nature it will bring about that thing which it despises most--the world socialist revolution. Marx said that we will see capitalism's boom-then-bust cycle grow increasingly more impossible to control, until it hits a 'low' so deep, so wide-reaching, that workers everywhere will unite and say, 'HEY! This isn't right.' The Great Depression is an example of one such 'deep low' in capitalism's cycle. 'Rollover' is a vision of the next such deep pit. Of how it comes about, in any case. Don't read the next bit if you don't want a spoiler, but the last scenes in the film are of the world proletariat rallying in public places, defying state authority...gearing up to rebel, in other words. That's about as Marxist as you can get! And you don't have to be a dork like me and read 'Das Kapital' to understand it. Maltin...didn't put the thought-effort into this one. And that's a shame, because I think it's a film that's very germane to American life. We think we have it good, and we'll always have it good, because this is the US of A. We have the FDIC now, we'll be all right. That's nonsense!! Maltin called 'Rollover' "financial science fiction." However imprecise that clumsy label might seem, there's a grain of truth to it. For what is sci fi but 'the thing that might someday be?'
El otro Francisco (1974)
Unique film; an answer to the abolitionist novel.
I don't think many people have seen much Cuban cinema, and that's a darn shame. The ICAIC (Cuban film institute) has produced some of the most innovative films I've ever seen. Espinosa's "El otro Francisco" ("The Other Francisco") is no exception. Or rather, aside from not deviating from ICAIC's tradition of exciting and innovative film, "Francisco" is nothing -but- exceptional. The film is a strange mix of pseudo-documentary techniques and melodramtic reconstruction. It basically refutes the notion that abolitionists (those who campaigned, in Cuba as well as in other nations, against slavery) were simply humanitarians. They had economic motivations for wanting to see slavery ended, a fact which the film attempts to illuminate by revealing that the way abolitionists chose to portray slavery was not, in fact, very close to the reality of slavery. So, first you get a snippet of a scene from a novel written by an abolitionist in (I think) 1868 (or 1858). You see the abolitionist's vision of the trials and tribulations of life on the plantation for a slave (the hapless Francisco) and his lover (another slave on the same plantation). Then, once this highly melodramatic scene is played out, you get the voice-of-God overlay narration coming in to tell you that, "No, in fact, this representation is highly unlikely. Here is what these slaves' lives were more likely to have been like." And then you get a sort of a historical revisionist view, which in fact refutes many of the images and ideas from the first scene. The film continues in this manner, thoroughly picking apart the original abolitionist novel, which we are told was recieved with much approval by the abolitionist "nobility" of Cuba. Some notes about the film: it -is- in Spanish, but with subtitles. I myself speak Spanish to a reasonable degree, but had trouble understanding what I figure must be the Cuban accent. Another note: don't go watching this film expecting to see a documentary. It really isn't quite that. Of course, it's not quite fiction, either. The film defies categorization...which to me is extremely interesting.