In Fabric (2018) Poster

(2018)

User Reviews

Review this title
168 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Half A Great Movie
angelakenney-529822 October 2019
There's something admirable about taking a film about a killer dress deathly seriously. It's this sort of commitment we just don't see in movies anymore and In Fabric should be applauded for daring to take its subject matter seriously.

In Fabric does start off well with Marianne Jean-Baptiste turning in a fantastic performance as a recently divorced woman working a soul crushing job, trying to take care of her rebellious live-at-home son and his truly awful girlfriend, and making time to go on dates with a bevvy of losers. Instantly, we can relate to this woman's plight and when she finds this beautiful red dress at a mysterious department store, it seems like things are looking up...until the dress starts making bad things happen. First of all, it doesn't want to be washed, so it causes washing machines to explode and, second of all, it was last worn by a model who met a gruesome end. Will our hapless heroine be next?

In Fabric's biggest issue is that it feels like a short Tales From the Crypt episode extended to almost two full hours, which leaves the audience mostly bored after the first hour. There's a major detour the film takes mid-way through when it gets bored with its heroine and introduces a new set of characters which brings the film down, because we don't care about them nearly as much. Maybe if Jean-Baptiste hadn't been so phenomenal in the first half or they'd decided to make a film about multiple characters encountering this red dress, it wouldn't have been as jarring a switch.

It looks stunning, has atmosphere in spades, and the music score is haunting, but it goes on for far too long and ends in the most anti-climactic way imaginable. It's still worthy of your time, but it's a shame a few things get in the way of it being really excellent.
118 out of 137 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bonkers in a Good way
paulellis-4102022 June 2020
Billed as a comedy horror on Now-TV, hmm, not your usual fare, it's quite grown up stuff. Read a review when it came out and was quite intrigued, was hard to catch due to it's limited release but glad I caught up with this. There are horror elements, I loved the 70's lo-fi visuals that layer the atmosphere. One particular scene was both funny (peculiar-but a lot of this film is) and gross out. There is a sense of dread and foreboding pervading a lot of the film. There are some laugh out loud moments, particularly toward the end. I really enjoyed this, the performances were great, didn't take itself too seriously and was engaged throughout though I felt it faltered at the beginning of the 3rd act before picking up to a satisfying finale. Certainly not for everyone, a bit arthouse psychedelic, certainly not mainstream but for me an interesting, fun and different watch. Just don't expect a lot of sense and immerse yourself in it's stylish and assured bonkersness (if there is such a word).
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
In Fabric
Prismark1011 February 2020
Peter Strickland has taken an inspiration from M R James Whistle and I'll Come to You and given it a twist. In Fabric comes across as Dario Argento decided to make a kitchen sink drama in Britain.

Sheila (Marianne Jean-Baptiste) is looking for a dress for a blind date. The shop assistant Miss Luckmore (Fatma Mohamed) a lady with a thick east european accent and a peculiar way of talking sells her an artery red dress with a mind of its own. It also is a bearer of bad fortune.

Sheila gets a rash and the washing machine dismantles when washing the dress. She has strange dreams and maybe her work is being affected. Sheila is a bank clerk who seems to be having weird appraisal meetings which includes being criticised that she has not shaken hands properly with someone.

Later the story switches to Reg (Leo Bill) and his fiance Babs (Hayley Squires.) Reg wore the dress as a prank for his drunken stag night and again they seemed cursed. He gets a rash, the washing machine falls apart. Reg who is a washing machine repairer gets fired by his employer for fixing his own machine without permission. Something about they provided him with the training.

In Fabric is a strange surreal film with influences that range from David Lynch, Dario Argento, Terry Gilliam to Ken Loach. It is set in some undefined time, but it looks like the 1980s. It makes a statement about consumerism and working in nightmarish bureaucratic organisations. The low cost airline Ryanair charge their pilots for their training. One day the pilots might go and work for someone else with the training they have provided to them.

The second half is certainly weaker and the change of cast is jarring. At times it is too weird for its own good. Maybe the film should had stuck with Sheila's story and then ended.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very strange, very stylish, very funny, but not for everyone
Bertaut10 July 2019
One of the most visually and aurally accomplished filmmakers currently working, writer/director Peter Strickland has thus far enjoyed considerable critical acclaim and some limited arthouse, but has been unable to make much of a mainstream impact. Not that he seems remotely bothered by this, as his latest, In Fabric, is easily the most impenetrable work in his oeuvre. Although he definitely flirts with embracing the transformative power of fine clothing, he is far more interested in mocking some of the more crass elements of consumerism, particularly the pernicious lure of "the bargain", and the herd mentality manufactured, maintained, and exploited by retail corporations during Black Friday (an event that if witnessed by aliens would surely lead to them judging us too intellectually rudimentary to bother conquering). In Fabric's biggest problem is that it's made up off two loosely-connected storylines, but because the first one is so much more interesting, it leads to some narrative slackness in the second half, and all in all, it's not a patch on his best work to date, The Duke of Burgundy (2014). Nevertheless, it's brilliantly acted, looks (and sounds) amazing, has an unparalleled commitment to the more tactile elements of the medium, is exceptionally funny, and will never allow you look at a washing machine repairman in quite the same way again.

Set in a London suburb at an unspecified point in the 1980s, the film tells the story of bank teller Sheila Woolchapel (Marianne Jean-Baptiste, playing the role as if she's in a piece of 1960s social realist cinema). A recently-divorced mother to a teenage son, Vince (Jaygann Ayeh), whose girlfriend Gwen (Gwendoline Christie having an absolute blast) seems to have moved in without asking, Sheila's life is in a rut. Having recently placed a lonely-hearts ad in the paper, she has an upcoming date, is determined to make a good first impression, and so visits a Dentley & Soper department store looking to buy something nice in the January sales. All but accosted by Eastern European sales assistant Miss Luckmoore (Strickland regular Fatma Mohamed, who gleefully plays the role like she's in a Halloween special of The Simpsons (1989)), she is talked into buying an "artery red" dress. However, it doesn't take long for Sheila to realise that something is not entirely kosher about the garment - from prompting dog attacks to trashing her washing machine to floating above her bed, clearly the dress is as nefarious as a Dublin-made shell suit (although it looks slightly less ridiculous), and has nothing but bad intentions for Sheila. Meanwhile, the wedding of washing machine repairman Reg (Leo Bill) and his fiancée Babs (Hayley Squires) is fast approaching; Sheila's micromanaging bosses, Stash and Clive (a hilarious Julian Barratt and Steve Oram, respectively), have some concerns over her method of shaking hands; Luckmoore and her boss, Lundy (Richard Bremmer), spend their free time doing something questionable to a mannequin; and a game of Ludo between Sheila, Vince, and Gwen redefines the term passive-aggressive.

In Fabric is fundamentally a consumerist satire, along the lines of Dawn of the Dead (1978). The malignant control that capitalism exerts on the masses, the commodification of desire, the exploitation and manipulation of notions of self-worth - all are interwoven into the film's style and texture. Strickland has a real talent for using his themes to elevate style into something more meaningful, and In Fabric provides more evidence of that, with the highly-stylised aesthetic commenting on the ultimate emptiness of retail therapy. Leaning into the artificiality of the film's milieu, Strickland makes no attempt to construct a believable, lived-in world, asking not only how do the customers of Dentley & Soper not realise something is wrong, but so too querying whether our own real-world behaviour is any different when we see an item we've been craving turn up in a sale.

With that in mind, although this is not an especially realistic film, it is an absolutely gorgeous film, and gleefully embraces gaudy 70s kitsch. Reproducing the hyper-stylised look of classic giallos, the most obvious touchstone is Suspiria (1977), with Strickland and cinematographer Ari Wegner bathing the film in a lurid colour palette of over-the-top reds, purples, and greens. The other-worldly vibe is helped immensely by nm10258277's synth score full of harsh electronic screams and repetitive droning, and the queasy, disorientating sound design by Martin Pavey. Filling the soundtrack with non-diegetic whispering and incantations, the aural design keeps the viewer constantly on edge, as if the evil in the dress has somehow infected the magnetic track - just listen to the sounds of the bargain-hunting crowds in Dentley & Soper, with the incoherent mumbling of their stampede into the store turned into a chaotic, animal-like din.

One of the film's most successful elements, and one of the reasons it's so funny, is how ultra-seriously everyone takes the whole thing. Jean-Baptiste, Bill, and Squires all play their parts as if they're in a Ken Loach film (which all three have been in the past), whilst Strickland, for his part, approaches the whole endeavour with a similar reverence - there's no winking at the audience here, and it's the absence of such winking that makes it all so funny. From Stash and Clive explaining the correct etiquette when meeting the mistress of one's boss to the sexual power that Reg has over women once he starts explaining the inner workings of a washing machine, the film's humour is rooted firmly in the fact that no one acts like they're in a comedy (just look at the Ludo game from hell or the scene where Stash and Clive discuss the difference between "looking for staff" and "trying to find staff"). The scenes of the dress crawling around Sheila's house are especially funny partly because they look so ridiculous (you can all but see the wires leading off-camera), but mainly because Strickland treats them with complete sincerity. A film about an evil dress shouldn't work on any level except parody, yet it's precisely because the film doesn't seem parodic that it works so well. This is particularly true of the insane proclamations uttered by Luckmoore ("the hesitation in your voice is soon to be an echo in the recesses of the spheres of retail"; "our perspectives on the specters of mortality must not be confused by an askew index of commerce"; "dimensions and proportions transcend the prisms of our measurements"; "did the transaction validate your paradigm of consumerism?"). This is pure verbal diarrhoea, and can only be in any way effective if it's roundly mocked. And yet, it's the utter dearth of mockery that renders each statement so hilarious.

In terms of problems, by the very nature of what he's trying to accomplish, Strickland is somewhat guilty of allowing the film's sensual elements to overwhelm the characters. Certainly, the film burrows under your skin and lodges there, and Strickland has absolute mastery of the tone, but aside from Luckmoore, none of the characters really linger because none are especially interesting as people. From an emotional point of view, there just isn't a huge amount of empathy or pathos. Also, because the Sheila plot is so much more interesting that the Reg plot, the film seems front-loaded, which is never good. And although it didn't bother me, some people will really dislike the amount of loose ends, unexplained background elements, and narrative dead ends, especially in the last act.

Nevertheless, I really enjoyed In Fabric. Yet more evidence that Strickland is a master stylist (in the best sense of the term), the craft behind the film is simply beyond reproach. Feeling for all the world like a rediscovered giallo, lost for the last four decades and restored to its original glory (complete with very questionable dubbing), it's cryptic and impenetrable, but so too is it hilarious and a feast for the senses. No one makes films quite like Strickland, where the existential and esoteric rub shoulders with the tactile and the sensual, where the textures of the milieu leap off the screen right alongside the themes. Hypnotic, seductive, immensely enjoyable, In Fabric is quite unlike anything you'll see all year.
79 out of 121 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Artistic and different
Gordon-1126 April 2020
The concept is interesting, but the film is really strange. It is not the regular horror film. It is artistic, and it is different.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"In Fabric"
actualbookworm17 October 2020
If you're in for a weird, funny, erotic, crazy trip inspired by Italian horror movies in the '70s, then you'll like this movie.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Viewer Beware
ok-patrick26 August 2019
Definitely worth a watch, but as pointed by others, not for everyone. It carries a masterful arthouse 70's direction, editing, color scheme and production altogether, dressed up with weird, repetitive vintage synth tracks and some peculiar cuts at times beyond comprehension. At one point I thought the movie was stuck. It wasn't. You've been warned.
26 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Half good, half overstretched
barbarahell7 June 2019
I had the opportunity to watch the preview with Q&A with Peter Strickland, and the useless questions from the audience, eager to show they had some knowledge and references instead of genuine questions, did not allow me to ask the director: why didn't you stop after the first half ? I enjoyed this first part, stylish, quite funny, and it could have ended like that, we had got it. The second half of the film was in my opinion un-necessary, adding nothing else to the plot and even making the movie feel too long. A bit like too little jam on too long a bread slice, it lost its taste, and became repetitive, over the top and I must say quite boring in the end. Sometimes, a short story is better than a novel. The things which are really FANTASTIC about this film are the soundtrack and music. You might want to watch it just for that!
84 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
In Fabric
ainhozara7 October 2018
Watched it in SSIFF and absolutely loved it. The audience laughed and gasped throughout the whole film and the soundtrack fitted the atmosphere perfectly. I loved the aesthetic it had, even though the screenplay sometimes made little sense. % 100 recommend if you are looking for a different film!
58 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well it's certainly a, erm, thing??
donttouchmeprimate31 August 2019
I'm sure this movie had all subtle and deeper meanings in its story, that expressed certain aspects and parodies between a species of consumers and the human condition, but I didn't get it. There were moments where I thought I was starting to understand but I'm ultimately too dumb so...

It's an interesting and engaging film with a fantastic cast. I may not know what I just saw but I know I enjoyed it.

I've made no sense have I?
25 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sadly a disappointment
BandSAboutMovies17 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I've often discussed the difference between grindhouse and arthouse. That line is quite easy to cross and hard to define at the same time. The films of Peter Strickland are great examples of movies that live between that division. From the revenge film Katalin Varga and the giallo-exploring Berberian Sound Studio to the Jess Franco homage The Duke of Burgundy, he's taken movie forms that would normally be video nasties in his nome country and made them palatable to a more refined mindset.

Sheila Woodchapel (Marianne Jean-Baptiste, TV's Without A Trace) is a recently divorced woman whose life is bleak to say the very least. Her son still takes his father's side and has a new femme fatale girlfriend (Gwendoline Christine, who played Brienne of Tarth on Game of Thrones and Captain Phasma in the recent Star Wars movies) who has taken over their home. At work, her bosses Stash (Julian Barratt from The Mighty Boosh) and Clive constantly asks her to document all her time, how she shakes hands and even how she speaks to her boss's mistress. And her attempts at finding love are boring at best.

That all changes when she visits Dentley and Soper's to buy a dress from Miss Luckmoore. Of course, that dress soon begins to make her life even worse, giving her a rash and nearly tearing off her hand when she attempts to wash it. Every time the dress is nearly destroyed, it repairs itself. And then it tries to kill Gwen as she has sex. Finally, as Sheila tries to bring the dress to a charity shop, she's killed when a mannequin appears in the middle of the road, causing her to crash.

The dress finds its way to washing machine repairman Reg Speaks, who is forced to wear it by his friends. His life is also a nightmare, as he's in a loveless engagement with Babs and his boss delights in abusing him. Also - for some reason - people love to hear him drone on about washing machine issues, as it makes them go into trances.

It all ends with Reg being fired and then hypnotized by ads for the store's sale and suffocating from a gas leak. At the very same time, Babs tries to get another dress and realizes that the store is where her dream of getting thinner and dying occurred. The dress catches fire as the store turns into a riot of shoppers.

Land and a mannequin escape into a dumbwaiter, where a dead model, Sheila, Reg, and Babs are all shown sewing their own dresses from their blood, a hell of their own making, while other spaces are shown for more souls. Above this all, a fireman walks through the ruined store only to find the dress has emerged unscathed.

This film feels inspired by the post-giallo supernatural horrors of Argento. But while those strange Italian horrors seem to be able to exist within the absolute film excuse that nothing has to make sense, the shift between story one and two here is so abrupt that it feels as if we're watching two different films with the same story.

My wife had been anxiously awaiting this film and to say that she was disappointed is an understatement. I'm much more forgiving of movies that want to be important art with something to say while she wants more narrative cohesion. She must love me, because she sat through all of El Topo in a theater, an act which she has later complained of numerous times.

Back to how this all opened. If you go into this hoping for art, you're going to have to wallow in the miasma of exploitation. And if you want a thrill, you'll find yourself dealing with an examination of London consumerism in the mid-70's. I don't know if this movie can truly satisfy either audience properly. But hey - it's another example of A24 knowing exactly how to cut a trailer that makes people want to see a movie that they otherwise probably would have never watched in the first place.
49 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
HAUNTING...HELL-INSPIRED ART-FILM...SURREAL HORROR...DARK-DARK-COMEDY...SEXUALLY OBSESSED
LeonLouisRicci13 August 2021
Definite Dream-Like Supernatural Retro-Horror.

Art-House Approach Unleashing Torment from Forces from Another Dimension.

Beautiful and Disturbing Psychological Mind-Games Interspersed with Intriguing Commentary on Consumerism, Laced with Sexuality.

Impacting the Viewer with Sound-Stings and Attention to Detail.

An Accomplished Violent Vision with an Ultra-Colorful Display that Invades the Eye and Ear with Amplification.

Well Acted Group-Art from the Dedicated and Talented Production Team that Conjurs a Unique and Unsettling Spell.

Limited Appeal for the Masses, but a Satisfying Experience for the Cult-Crowd.

Wearing its Differentness with a Proud Palette of Creativity and Confidence.

Probably a Love-Hate Relationship and Response from the Overall Audience.

For the Take-a-Chance Lovers of Cinema as Art who Order Their Selections from the Catalog of the Bizarre and Bewildering.

Those Movie Lovers that have a Taste for the Glamorous and Unusual.

Director-Writer Peter Strickland's Film about a Cursed Red-Dress Patronizes while Respecting Those Looking for that "Sign-Post Up Ahead".

Essential for those Seeking the "Doors of Perception" to Gain Entry to Experience a Mind-Bending.

For Folks on the Least Traveled Road... this is Their Destination.

They have Arrived and Now Reside in the "Twilight Zone".

For Others...Not so Much.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Witches spinning webs maybe...
fairlesssam2 July 2023
This film reminded me very much of the Suspiria remake, where witches run a dance school to instil their dark magic into the fabric of the dance.

In Fabric is a cryptic film where a (what seems to be) old fashioned dress store is run by a peculiar array of characters, that may or may not be, witches.

It is a very stylised portrayal, where the use of character behaviour is emphasised and magnified. The dress store uses television advertisements to project images onto potential customers who are vulnerable to their charms. The staff in the store are like spiders spinning webs to capture flies. They are quite unnerving.

There is a sexual element to the film which is very crude and somewhat repulsive. It seems to link in with the store staff and somehow feeds them. The mannequins are featured in the plot as potential important elements as are the models in the catalogue.

I think that the victims are used to make new frocks so they are part of the fabric of the clothing, hence a cycle of dark entrapment for the forces that run the store.

A very interesting concept, I have read a few books with similar threads by authors such as Bentley Little and Graham Masterton.

I am unsure as to why it is labelled a horror/comedy because there didn't seem to be anything funny about the whole thing!!

Not my cup of tea but I'm very glad to have seen it and I'm sure it will play on in my mind for quite a while. It holds a strong cast, who were a pleasure to watch.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
What's with the bleeding hairy mannequin?
dieseltech-593171 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this movie lastnight. Loved the soundtrack. I forgot to drop some LSD so didn't really understand what was going on it. Who were the sellers of the dress? Vampires? I didn't understand the whole mannequin bleeding and curly hair thing. Does anybody? I feel as though part 1 and part 2 were crammed together however it is understandable because I certainly would not watch a part 2 of this movie if ever released. Bizarre movie to say the least.
58 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very unique
Red_Identity25 September 2019
There's no doubt this film fits the style it is going for very well. The directing and aesthetic is really well done.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Dress to Die For
richardchatten30 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Although at first it seems superficially more grounded in the mundane world of ordinary working stiffs than Peter Strickland's two previous films, 'Berberian Sound Studio' (2012) and 'The Duke of Burgundy' (2014), 'In Fabric' is less organised than either of those two and runs out of plot well before its nearly two hours are up.

It's vibrant saturated colours, however, (including the lacquered lips and fingernails of Strickland regular Fatma Mohamed, who provides the vampire - complete with a presumably authentic Transylvanian accent and Max Schreck's bald head - I missed from 'The Duke of Burgundy') along with frequent dark humour, makes me keen to see what Strickland comes up with next. I just hope it doesn't take another four years.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wonderfully weird visual and aural orgy of the mind!
omendata27 August 2019
Wow this is a rather unique film and rather disturbing (in a good way)!

There are arty-farty films and then there is this; which although it might seem a bit artsy-fartsy to some, is not up its own backside for once but has a wonderful blend of old style 70's Hammer House Of Horror & Tales Of The Unexpected filming techniques with some really sublime and psychedelic music and sound effects which gloriously complement its weird, wonderfulness. Some of the language and ideas actually require the film to be watched more than once just to comprehend this vast visual and aural tapestry!

It will not appeal to many but I like its over the top, yet understated style and pure strangeness. It does not try to be arty farty, it is just one of those films that are made and have a uniqueness that many arty directors strive so hard for but this one effortlessly glides into your minds eye and pokes you in the brain - a very strange but hypnotic film and no mistake - I just could not stop watching to see what weirdness was to come next and hoping it was not over yet - wow just pure wow!!!
13 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting and Uneven
jramalho1 February 2020
Most of the key points have already been made. Its not quite a full story, its not quite an anthology. And Marianne Jean-Baptiste is so good in her beleaguered performance that the second story never adequately clicks, and its characters never impress as much. By the end I had the feeling the second act was there to add two more people to the final "basement" scene, that drives home the message of eternal damnation. But, besides the bravado of using the trope of a cursed dress, the mood, sets and music are outstanding and reminiscent of old "Italian horror-giallo", as they were in the also interesting and almost-great "Berberian Sound Studio", a previous film by Peter Strickland, with (in my opinion) many of the same issues. I would really be interested in watching a film in which the author directs someone else's script, because that seems to be the issue: mood and style versus storytelling, with the latter clearly coming in second. Not that it is not a hypnotic experience. One last thought to the wonderfully creepy Fatma Mohamed, who does a great turn as a verbose store clerk with a wonderful presence and weird dialogue (see the Quotes section). I had never heard of her except as a voice-over actress, also in "Berberian Sound Studio". Although we can never say exactly what she is about, she and Marianne Jean-Baptiste alone are worth the price of admission, together with the whole visual and aural experience Strickland puts on.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Fails to live up to expectations
The_Film_Anorak16 July 2019
Maybe it's unfair on the makers of the film to criticise it for not being what I was expecting, but In Fabric does set some expectations with how it is marketed and how the film starts. What I was expecting was some sort of Giallo-style headtrip of a film with supernatural elements, but with a backdrop of quirky 80s suburban England. A sort of Dario Argento meets Mike Leigh.

That's what I thought I was getting for the first 30 to 40 minutes of the film but then it seemed to lose its way. The atmosphere, the sympathetic but troubled protagonist played by Marianne Jean-Baptiste, the strange and perverted department store in an eccentric Thames Valley Town - I was loving it and couldn't wait to see what happened next. Then it just failed to pay off, carried on going, carried on failing to pay off, then half-heartedly tried to become a compendium story and meandered off into nowhere. There was a belated attempt to give it a kind of shocking climax but by then all atmosphere and interest had gone out of the film.

I find that when I try to describe the film, it sounds a lot better than it actually turned out on screen. The idea of this film is something I really wanted to see but it didn't deliver on its promise. A lot of interesting and unsettling ideas are just thrown together without tying it together into something that maintains the viewer's interest. It didn't have to make sense, it didn't have to explain, it didn't have to do what I was expecting. But it should have been better and it ended up being very disappointing.
62 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Profound Conjugation...
Xstal21 April 2020
... of Tales Of The Unexpected with Hammer House and a twist of Carry On Screaming makes for an engaging view on post holiday sales.
25 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stars for style; stars for acting.
Princess_of_Power28 May 2020
Stars for style; stars for acting, but none for that inexplicable, gross, and pretentious mannequin scene. You can have two of those characteristics, but not all three. Although pulling off portraying all three is a feat in and of itself, I suppose.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Artsy Fartsy
SentientAnomaly5 April 2022
Starts off decently with a credible plot. That, however, ultimately leads to a boring mess of a story which doesn't really go in any particular direction. It becomes evident before halfway through that this is another self-indulgent artsy fartsy production. Ended up watching it at 2x speed and it was still a slog to get to the end.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Disturbing But Compelling Arthouse Horror
Pairic11 July 2019
In Fabric: A dark horror film with elements of twisted humour. The fashion police need to pay a call on the store which is having a sake, with a special on a red dress which seems to be possessed, literally a dress to kill. Influences from Italian horror movies and fashion films abound but Peter Strickland puts his own auteural stamp on this flick. A satire on sales - customers get into fights with each other and the staff - mixed with 60s/70s style psychedelic tv ads and newspaper montages advance a possible critique of consumer culture. But the emphasis is most certainly on Horror.

The head sales assistant exudes an aura of Vampirism which is emphasised as she is dressed like a 19th century Spanish Widow as are the rest of the staff apart from the decrepit and ancient manager who resembles Bela Lugosi after a hard night on the booze and drugs. But he comes to life when rugby-tackling a shoplifter. Shop dummies are treated as if they were alive and some events in the film make you wonder about this. The red dress causes distress and skin rashes to wearers, it comes to life and attacks people.

The film also relates to the dating scene and modern management-speak but the dress is the real star. Peter Strickland has delivered a convincing horror movie which will shock and offend some people. Not for the squeamish. 8/10.
31 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nice atmosphere
helena-burstrom5 March 2021
I loved the atmosphere in the first half of the movie. It felt dreamy and almost a little mesmerizing...and the music added to the feeling. The second half of the film completely lost its feeling and you became more unconcerned about what was happening. Too bad
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Art for the sake of art...Not much substance...
tchitouniaram4 September 2019
Art for the sake of art...Not much substance... It' like a mixture of"1984" with "Rubber",with a try to imitate David Lynch,Dario Argento and Cronenberg all at once...The result is very artful,but fails to really engage and excite,like the films of abovementioned Masters...All in all 5 stars for a good visuals,acting,music. One time watch,doesn't go into the collection...
62 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed