Just bizzare how people form prejudgments and completely ignore the evidence. An example is in one of these reviews. If the Press had not predetermined guilt based on nothing, that couple would not have been branded guilty. The one clearly guilty party who was in that room was Guerde and he was almost completely ignored by the Press and Prosecution. He still is! He was never publically cross examined so his version cannot be unpicked. That's just unbelievable. His previous pattern of criminal behaviour was also ignored. The police here also get obsessed about proving their theory and people have been falsely convicted because of that.
The couple of students simply did not have any motivation, and it was Sollecito that phoned the police. No blood stained clothing of theirs was ever found, evidence collection was blatantly unprofessional, the idea they "cleaned up" yet left obvious stains on a tap just ridiculous. And apparently they never tested a semen stain. Unbelievable. The only certain DNA found in that room was of Guerde. The alternative theory makes sense and is an old story - burglary gone wrong and rape. He then ran away to Germany and even changed his name. How much evidence do people need. His DNA, hand and foot prints...
The couple of students simply did not have any motivation, and it was Sollecito that phoned the police. No blood stained clothing of theirs was ever found, evidence collection was blatantly unprofessional, the idea they "cleaned up" yet left obvious stains on a tap just ridiculous. And apparently they never tested a semen stain. Unbelievable. The only certain DNA found in that room was of Guerde. The alternative theory makes sense and is an old story - burglary gone wrong and rape. He then ran away to Germany and even changed his name. How much evidence do people need. His DNA, hand and foot prints...
