Ladyworld (2018) Poster

(2018)

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Pretty missunderstood but still not great
midwesternhooligans25 September 2019
This film is getting a lot of unnecessary politically charged criticism that has really nothing to do with what makes this film "broken" for a lack of a better word. The acting is so-so. I at least believe them often enough that I forgive a bad reading here or there. There are plenty of loose metaphors scattered about and really this is the main issue. This film wanders in a setting that's to small to really get going.

And there is the major "elephant in the room"... regrading the windows.... ugh. I get it "wUt iF wE GEt cOMfoRtableeeeeee."

If you watch a lot of movies already give this a shot maybe you'll get something out of it. If you're a more casual viewer skip it

Its 'Lord of the flies' meets 'The Hole'
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
GIANT PLOT HOLE IN THE FIRST 10 MINUTES
cigarsmoker-4494422 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Plot hole first, then actual review. They can get out at any time. The windows are piled up with dirt, but not to the top. That means they could break a window and climb out over the dirt that would then spill in freeing themselves from the house.

While all the girls/women in this are decent in their roles, and their acting is good enough to be enjoyable I found the actual script to be much less than stellar. The sound in this movie is the worst thing I've heard in years. Literal years. The sound director should be fired and never work again. The sound was jarring, played for minutes longer than it ever needed to play for, and felt like it didn't belong with any of the shots they were set in. Even the few sounds that did make sense were overly long and thus became jarring. My 3 stars are for the acting only. These peoples' descent into madness and base instinct didn't work for me. Maybe the glaring plot hole was just too much, maybe the half naked women running around was too gratuitous, even without being actually naked? It's all basically came down to 7 women being terrible to each other for no reason.

Watch it if you feel the need, like I said the acting is fair.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Little earthquakes
BandSAboutMovies11 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
What if Lord of the Flies only had women? That's pretty much the question posed by this 2018 movie, which was directed by Amanda Kramer.

The film begins with a disorienting earthquake that soon finds eight teenage girls trapped in a house together. As supplies begin to run low, so does their grip on reality and sanity.

One of the characters, Dolly, says "We're not boys. We're not brutal." That's not true. After all, I've had numerous young boys punch me in the face and I can't remember their names, while the slings and arrows of women hurt you way worse and are so much more memorable.

Soon, Olivia (Gert from Marvel's Runaways) and Piper (Annalise Basso, Oculus and Ouija: Origin of Evil) are vying for leadership over the pack of girls, who are soon dressed in increasingly strange and more fashion-forward costumes. Their world is dominated by worries of further earthquakes and the potential of a man who may have snuck into the house.

Ryan Simpkins, who was the young co-lead alongside Maggie Gyllenhaal in Sherrybaby, plays Dolly. Maya Hawke, who was such a breakout actress on the most recent season of Stranger Things, also appears.

The film comes off as quite similar to a stage play. Your willingness to deal with its long pauses and extended takes will determine how much you enjoy it, as well as how much you can deal with artier films. Don't go in expecting a slasher movie.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The only thing uncomfortable is the fact it lasts more than 5 minutes.
SJLiam28 August 2019
I'm a fan of all sorts of film and I especially love those little "undiscovered" films that stand out. The problem is, when you seek out films of that nature, you run into far more like this. It wants to be deep. It tries real damned hard to be Art. But to this viewer, it was neither. I'd use the word Tedious. Aside from the, and I use this term as lightly as humanly possible, music (which was little more than repeated noises and Girl Moans..), the thing that bothered me the most was the camera filter. At several points in the film it looks like pantyhose with a hole cut in them are stretched over the lens, the edges of the screen are dark and the center almost looks like you are watching the film by flashlight. It's not artsy or claustrophobic, it's sophomoric lighting and cinematography. Actually, if this was a student film... no.. wait. Nevermind, it would still be boring. The actresses are all capable of handling better material. If I were them, I'd fire my agent. As a moviegoer, you'd do better watching pretty much anything else up to and including paint drying.
33 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Like a bad school play
LLgoatJ22 September 2019
This is about a group of girls trapped in a house, after a catastrophic event, slowly going mad as food and water runs out. You immediately think Lord of the Flies but nothing happens. The characters are just unlikeable. You end up not caring at all about them. It's supposed to be arty but just ends up like a really bad school play.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Please don't let this writer or director free again.
michegg27 August 2019
I spend lots of time watching all sorts of films from low budget art to sci-fi blockbusters and i can honestly say this is the worst thing my eyes have ever seen i can understand the attempt at showing human nature in its true form but this is pure drivel and unbelievable.
32 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
COME ON MICHAEL
thisonetime-593021 September 2019
Those windows open inward ladies!!!! Just pull them open and crawl out!!! Unless the moral of the story is that teenage girls are all mindless idiots, this was really disappointing. You're trapped in a house for days without food and you don't even try to break a window... Don't waste our time with this garbage.

Seriously, you can see the hinges on the windows that suggests they would just swing open. Massive oversight
19 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just a Waste of Time
fathermaxie28 August 2019
I created an IMDB account just to review this movie:

This movie is a total waste of your time. Everything feels cheap about it, its annoying, and it does not have any sense of story. And it doesn't make sense. Please just watch something else, if you are intrigued by my review, just skip through the movie and you will understand what I mean.

Hate to say it, garbage.
18 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wtf did I just watched ???
borgof-676382 January 2020
An effing waste of time on a try hard Arthouse piece of trash. What was the point of the movie? Bad acting and direction.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolute garbage
vds_bram5 February 2022
Honestly one of the worst movies Ive ever seen. It's weird, annoying, cheap... I would feel bad if I'd have created this film knowing people paid for it to watch.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
great cast, great acting, but what was this movie?
tdh_fbi28 September 2020
What drew me to this movie, first and foremost, was the cast. I've been a huge fan of actress Annalise Basso, who played Piper, for several years now. I'm also a fan of Ariela Barber, who played Olivia, who I had seen in a movie that she had done when she was much younger. It was nice to see her in something as a young adult with more mature material to work with. As much as I liked the premise of a close-quarters character study set in a very limited setting, how the movie actually played out (at least to me) was equal parts underwhelming and confusing. Scenes of tension and/or peril would start only to cut to more slow and mundane scenes out of the blue, sometimes right in the middle of the previous scene. It probably would've also been better of they had fleshed out the start and the aftermath of the earthquake a little better. One positive that I will give to this movie is that it looked to me like a mixture of The Shining and Suspiria, what with its deliberately haunting music and frazzled tempo.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mislabeled, misunderstood - marvelous
I_Ailurophile18 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I'll watch almost anything. Sometimes that works in my favor, sometimes it doesn't. It's hard not to notice the poor reception this movie has garnered, but I've watched others, just as low-rated, and found them a marvel. I tried to approach 'Ladyworld' with an open mind, ready for anything.

Much more than I thought could be the best case scenario - I actually really like 'Ladyworld.' I know I hold a minority view here. That's okay.

I appreciate the opening: As introductory credits appear as white text on a black screen, we're treated to a great cacophony of sound, representing whatever calamity it was - seemingly a massive earthquake - to set the story in motion. For that matter, from a technical standpoint, the sound is rather pristine. I also enjoy Callie Ryan's score - sparse and shifting, at times an ambient soundscape, at others a discordant arrangement of non-lyrical vocals, but always lending its substantial uneasy atmosphere to the film. Honestly, I enjoy the music so much I'd love to be able to download it, or in some other way add it to my collection. Hats off to the wardrobe and makeup departments, too, for some fine work.

Characters in 'Ladyworld' represent a variety of personalities, their mentalities increasingly deteriorating as time passes. Some characters are notably more dominant or submissive, while others strike a balance and try to keep the peace. Most distinct of all are Piper (Annalise Basso), forceful, mocking, and cruel; Dolly (Ryan Simpkins), unstable and despondent in her despair and emotional disturbance; and Olivia (Ariela Barer), reasonable and steady but struggling to maintain a semblance of order. Romy (Maya Hawke) seems to very quickly demonstrate the collapse of her mental state, even more so than the others - and even still falling farther as Piper splits the group and becomes ever more predatory.

Dialogue - interactions, and story beats generally - range from the mundane, to troubled outbursts or acting out; from philosophizing, to social commentary, and building to combative, venomous barbs of posturing. The depiction of these elements pointedly grows in ferocity as characters' mindsets crumble further. Cosmetics and assembled outfits are worn to exaggerated effect portending warpaint and tribal division. Aggressive displays of status increasingly turn violent - until at last the veil is lifted from the microcosm of necessitated self-reliance, and all are left shattered by what has transpired.

Through it all, I genuinely think every performance here is fantastic. The screenplay and characterizations require robust attention to nuance, even as the fractured upheaval swells in amplitude, and I think every young actress in the cast is more than capable. Far be it from me to single anyone out, but I think Hawke's role as Romy is especially built on subtlety - the timbre of her voice, the look in her eyes. And while I'm predisposed to liking Hawke based on what I've seen of her elsewhere, I think she particularly stands out in 'Ladyworld.' Again, though, don't take that as a slight against others; I'd love to see more films from everyone involved.

Film-maker Amanda Kramer serves both as writer, conjuring the narrative and all within, and as director, finding eye-catching shots and guiding the cast and crew in her vision. She has concocted a fine, compelling, artful examination of social order and the universal trend toward chaos. It's easy to read 'Ladyworld' as an adaptation, after a fashion, of 'Lord of the flies' - and that's very fair; parallels are obvious. But this film leans significantly more into an artistic expression than into a plain story.

As if any aspect didn't vividly drive that point home, the very setting and premise demand the same calculated suspension of disbelief as any play conducted on a theatrical stage. From our place in the audience, taking the film at face value would tell us these young women could easily break a window and escape their circumstances. But we don't take any other movie at face value, and it's to our detriment to do so here. And so the exceptional substance of the film flows from the one supposition it asks us to accept: That a disaster has led to confinement. Lights, camera, action.

I earnestly believe that 'Ladyworld' has been mislabeled, and marketed inappropriately, thereby inviting undeserved criticism. It's a thriller, technically and truly, but it's such an overwhelmingly underhanded, inventively crafted interpretation of a thriller that the term almost doesn't meaningfully apply. It depends ponderously on actors and their characters, dialogue and physical action, imagination and belief, in their most basic, deconstructed definitions. It depends on these root elements so much that it sincerely feels like a semi-esoteric short film - light on narrative, heavy on intent and meaning - extended with profound, surprising deftness to feature length. At that, it almost feels less like a feature length film, and more like a play, caught on film.

It's unquestionably dense, less than conventional in its storytelling, and markedly disorderly in its chosen medium. I couldn't begrudge anyone for disliking this movie who has engaged with it honestly; I can understand the difficulty. I have a hard time imagining who I might recommend it to, because the correct receptive audience is so extremely select. Yet for any comparison to other stories, any minor lack of refinement, any imperfection, I find this to be peculiarly outstanding.

I don't think it's entirely perfect, in terms of content alone. Yet the technical skill behind its construction - the unique, unforgettable music - and above all the momentous artistic challenge Kramer has undertaken all combine to elevate my opinion higher than it already would be. Misunderstood as I believe it to be, by no means is 'Ladyworld' for everyone. But it's absolutely for me.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Greatly misunderstood
RickestRick15 November 2022
I cannot understand why this movie has such a poor rating. It's definitely for the art house crowd, there's no denying that. However, when taking on a whole, the movie has much more than it seems to show on the surface. The other reviewers comparing it to Lord of the Flies are correct, with a similar vibe, just in a "disaster strikes at a birthday slumber party" way. I'm not saying this movie is great, because it's not. What it is, is an interesting representation of what happens to people left to their own devices in a crisis situation. Watch it for the acting, which is very good, and don't read too much into it, and you might actually enjoy this movie.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An unfortunate realistic discomfort
Elijah_T29 April 2019
Somewhere between four and six people left the room by time we made it to the second half.

This is a rather disturbing film that gets into the ugliness of humanity. When the lights go out and food runs short, our suppressed inner selves start to come out. With an eerie score (that's too loud at times), a few mysteries to keep you wondering, and a cast of characters who are unlikable in their own way, Ladyworld will make you uncomfortable through the very end.
32 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed