"Criminal Minds" What Happens in Mecklinburg... (TV Episode 2014) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good case, bad subplot
TheLittleSongbird16 January 2017
This is not the first time that this has been said by me, but from personal opinion Season 9 is one of the weaker 'Criminal Minds' seasons with two of the show's low-points and the difference between the best of the season and the worst being pretty large.

"What Happens in Mecklinburg" is not up there with the best of the season like "Gabby" and "The Caller" (the two-part season finale also fared extremely favourably) but it's miles ahead of "The Inspiration", "The Black Queen" and especially "200". A long way from a bad episode, in fact it's a decent and often well done one, but there are a few major things that stop it from being great.

Starting with the good things, the production values as always are of very high quality with a lot of style and atmosphere. The music is suitably haunting and melancholic, having presence while not being overbearing. The script is thought-provoking, while the profiling makes sense, actually feels like effort was made to make it part of the story rather than feeling tacked on or like an afterthought. The acting is very good from all the regulars, while Anne Leighton's Sheila is both subtly chilling and moving.

Regarding the case it was pretty strong, although the unsub and the crime could have been revealed later and the motive for one of the abductions is a bit over the top and not as comprehensible as the others. There is tension and suspense, with a very creepy opening that sets up the tone very well indeed as well as a poignancy and irony, and there have not been many episodes in previous years that have make us feel a swaying mix of both sympathy and disgust for both the victims and the unsub and so vividly.

On the other hand, what especially brings down "What Happens in Mecklinburg" is the Morgan/Savannah subplot, it is little more than dull soap opera and it not only features too much in the episode but it paints Morgan as a jerk. Not to mention the zero chemistry between the two characters, and Savannah is a bit dull at the moment. As good as it was that he was called out on it later, it really didn't have to be done in a way to make people cringe with JJ being far too cold and like she had a stuck-up attitude problem, making her point with no subtlety at all.

As said too, the unsub and crime could and should have been revealed later. Making them obvious so soon did diminish the suspense levels a tad, while the middle act could have done with some tightening up pace-wise. Rochelle Ayrtes is rather bland as Savannah, not seeing much personality yet and seeing even less chemistry with Shemar Moore. Wouldn't have said no to more Rossi and Hotch, they are great characters and are barely in it practically.

On the whole, the case is good but the subplot really dragged things down. 6/10 Bethany Cox
10 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good, solid episode
blottogg22 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Unlike the previous episode, #9.21 has a coherent, well-integrated story. The red-herring flows naturally from the initial crime, and doesn't feel tacked on (or invented out of thin air). The clues are fairly subtle, but point to an accurate portrait of the unsub. This is how profiling (the central theme of the series) is supposed to work. The only ding I'd give the plot on technical grounds is the use of "Injustice Collector" in the profile. Injustice collectors from my understanding essentially shift the blame for their actions, woes and shortcomings to anything/everything else handy, and away from themselves. It's a combination of paranoia and irresponsibility. Christopher Dorner is mentioned by name, but Bryce Williams/Vester Flanagan (Virginia on-air shooter) is another example, one that occurred after this episode aired. The unsub in this episode is motivated more by straight vengeance borne of guilt/survivor's guilt. An actual injustice collector would be an excellent topic for a future episode (hint, hint).

The portions filling out Derek's love life in the B plot are obviously written by a woman (the womens' dialogue is stronger than Derek's, and wouldn't sound out of place on The View, or an old episode of Ophrah), but if the women writers keep coming up with tight, strong scripts like this, then I say keep hiring them to write more. I'm a guy, but I can sit through a few minutes of Ophrah-speak to get to the rest of this story's substance.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed