Bright Night (2014) Poster

(2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Weird
benjea29 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is very confussing. Sometimes i just need to have a little bit more explaination about things and this is movie is one of them. Is it a scyfy story? Maybe. Is it a drama? Maybe. Is it all really odd and confussing? Yes.

The one thing I would like to point out is that they filmed the straight sex scene with visual naked bodies. And the gay sex scene you only hear noices. Dont be a cliche, my dear. We can also take some nudity of to mens bodies too. So this was a bit of a let down as it is marked as a lgbti movie on netflix.

6/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Next, please...
EdgarST27 April 2024
What an obnoxious... and silly movie! A mature woman and her younger lover arrive at the house where she grew up, a cozy but run-down place in the countryside of the former Democratic Republic of Germany, where a mining project is slowly devastating the landscape and evicting the residents from the nearby town.

Although this setup is interesting, in the end it is nothing more than a trivial fact. What matters in this prudish drama is that a homosexual couple is also in the house to finish a legal process (not very explicit). The pair is made up of one of the woman's ex-lovers and his partner, a promiscuous psychologist, whose objective is to molest the woman and seduce her boy. The actor who plays the psychologist does so with a sign on his forehead that reads "I am a psychologist." And the script emphasizes it every time he opens his mouth, and delivers lines learnt in a course of Psychology 101.

In a mixture of dreams, double manifestations of the woman's psyche and games of seduction, the film ends up taking the path of "moralistic rectitude", when none of the four characters are worth a penny. I am sure you can find better things to do than watch this.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Intrigue descends into confusion
Gordon-1119 August 2016
This film tells the story of two couples who meet in one of their childhood home. They have not seen each other for a long time, and they haven't visited the house for years. It's a trip down the memory lane, making old devils resurface.

The first part of the film is slow but intriguing. The relationship of the four people is slowly revealed. As the past is unveiled, jealousy and sexual tension rise, and the story gets more interesting. However, the second part of the film suddenly contains this twist that makes me super confused. It seems as if it wants to be a sci-fi film suddenly. I tried figuring this bit of the plot out, but the plot just doesn't make sense. I wish this bit of the plot doesn't exist, and the film should just concentrate on the tension between the four of them.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Unlikeable, unrealistic and ultimately unimportant
Horst_In_Translation24 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Nachthelle" or "Bright Night" is a German 85-minute movie from last year. The director and one of the writers is Florian Gottschick and this relative short full feature film we have here is a contender for his most known work so far. It is basically the story of two couples (one straight, one gay) and how they meet again after a long time and how memories come back, some good, some not so good. The most central character of the story is played by Anna Grisebach and I must say I am not familiar with her as an actress at all. But what I saw here also did not get me curious. There are some more known actors in here though too, namely for example Benno Fürmann who plays one of the male protagonists and Michael Gwisdek, who only shows up in one scene. I already talked a bit about the story, but I would like to go into detail about it again a bit more. I must say it has nothing to do with reality in my opinion. One example would be how apparently all the characters really hate each other so much, yet they share such intimate stories and moments that makes me question the sense of the film as a whole. And the sex scene at the end, which clearly was intended as artistic and a happy ending for (almost) everybody involved rang very very false to me. All these conflicts earlier on and how do we solve them? Oh lets just have an orgy. Maybe Gottschick also understood that he does not have the talent to come up with a subtly convincing ending or solution to this film. Heck, it does not even have to be a happy ending at all. Eventually, just make it seem realistic. But they messed up on so many occasions before and the ending is nothing different to that regard. The characters' actions felt stupid and the acting was over-the-top on many occasions. The question to be asked here is not if you should see this movie. The question is if it is possible to say what the worst individual component of this film is. I guess the script takes the "prize". The dialogues sounded pretentious at times and the way the filmmakers tried so hard to convince us the characters are important and relevant, it was painful and cringeworthy to watch. Apart from that, shades are fine, but they were all unlikable and the way they tried to make them multi-layered did not work out either in keeping the audience interested. The rating here on IMDb for this film is not too high anyway, but it is still too high. This film was a mess and in my opinion, it is a contender for Top5 worst of 2015. As I have seen a lot (also a lot bad stuff) from that year, that is quite an "honor". Do yourself a favor and stay far far away from this movie. The only good thing I can say about it is really that it stays easily under the 1.5-hour mark. A character study gone very wrong.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Who's .. who
kosmasp1 February 2021
A drama about relationships ... past and present. And how they affect each other. Not to mention our brain and the infinite possibilities ... or rather conclusions a situtation like this can have. While the movie seems straightforward and has the cliches and predictable structure to a degree of any other love drama you have seen.

But then it twists and turns inside out ... or at least gives you quite a bit to think about. Certain things seem obvious and maybe even obnoxious ... but again the mystery element of the movie is able to keep things fresh. Also the actors ... kudos! Great work overall no matter what you think of the movie itself
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Homophobic woman pontificates on morality!
paint96983 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
An extremely homophobic woman descends on a home (with a boyfriend young enough to be her grandson) to be met by her ex-partner with his new boyfriend. What follows is basically a cinematic diatribe of said woman trying to come to grips with her hatred of gay men, presumably because a gay student in her past-came on to her then boyfriend (her ex-partner), who the commits suicide because of her assault and vindictiveness. The film takes the woman's side and sees her as a victim, rather than a symptom of rampant homophobic hatred. Nazi's still exist-even in this horrible woman's fantasy life!
6 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Intriguing but with some let down's on the way
Rodrigo_Amaro24 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Two couples spending some time visiting a country house from their past, sharing more than just stories from an old time but also bringing back to surface bitter memories, passions, curiosities, sexual tension and much more. First couple is Anna (Anna Grisebach) and Stefan (Vladimir Burlakov), who are buying the house from the second couple Bernd (Benno Fürmann) and Marc (Kai Ivo Baulitz). Fact is that Anna, at one time, was deeply involved with Bernd when they were teenagers; she was his first true love but something happened on the way, best leave out. In between nice dinners and lovely breakfasts, the present always finds a way to bring something dark and broody about the past; and during this minor chaos, Marc audaciously flirts with the clueless Stefan, paying no mind that his boyfriend is seeing (as later we discover, they have an open relationship). If from all that it seems the film has nowhere to go, well, it is actually. What triggers us in seeing is mostly to see how this quartet are going to survive through the weekend without killing each other or if the couples will indeed trade; there's some strange occurrences going on with objects falling and muddy footsteps to shake those characters nerves, and it'll get revealed in the end.

Writer/director Florian Gottschick and his co-writers created something good despite the uncountable clichés. It's a thoughtful drama that reveals how frail yet strong human relations are. Yet another story of the paradox of life. I didn't find that love was an important aspect of the film, or better saying, didn't find the characters were honest when they kept saying they loved each other (not blaming the actors, they're good. The lines as written weren't convincing), I didn't buy their love mostly being the light reflected in their partners eyes instead of actions - though Stefan seems the one who cares the most about the annoying Anna, he's genuine despite the naivety of youth, after all he's the youngest member of the quartet and the one who knew little about his own partner. In terms of displaying seduction, lust or just sex, the movie succeeds a little more. What bothered me is that a movie so open and frank about sexuality issues decides to portray the intimacy of a gay couple only through sounds while the straight is there for everyone to see (and no, the foursome scene from the poster is just for show. Beautiful photograph, but weirdly filmed when the moment came).

"Bright Night" has plenty of gripping elements that will generate the interest of the audience (the one who tends to like quiet moments and plenty of dialogs). What blocks the movie from reaching its full potential is the almost silly third act, as if taken from "Inception". Sure, this is the kind of film where odd things happen all the time, its expected to get those slightly unusual story treatments but those close to the edge scenes with Anna getting back in time seeing things from a difference perspective was just wrong. In fact, seeing most of the movie through her perspective is quite painful since she doesn't generate any kind of sympathy, she's filled with prejudice and tries to be thoughtful about everything. Had Bergman or Polanski writing this kind of story, they'd make something revealing (the setting is perfect, the house location), and they would use dream-like imagery or symbolisms that wouldn't affect the film's progress.

Whatever the case, the problems with "Bright Night" aren't bigger than its qualities. There's some good acting, it's very involving and the more stories the characters share about their past the more fascinating the film gets, it's all very intriguing, just losing the step at the final moments. Positively enjoyable, almost no harm. Gottschick just need to learn to widen his vision to present things, elaborate better scenarios and stick with the tension. 8/10
27 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
puzzle
Kirpianuscus6 September 2019
I saw it as a puzzle. The first part propose the original sketch. The second is dominated by improvisation. Two couples, memories and sex, conversation and secrets, a cottage and childhood traces.The good points - photography and the performance of Gudrun Ritter. The only sin, maybe, the desire to contain more than a simple theme . But , far to be a great movie, it is an interesting one.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A bad movie
ersbel14 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie does not have a script. It does however have a mess of the Writer slash Director's issues. Like the shifty West German, the complex East Germans, and so on. The film is obviously made with state money, because the story is at best a medium-short feature, maybe 30-35 minutes.

The subject is the girl. The boys are all gay, bisexual at best, which makes me believe the Writer slash Director is also gay and he is having trouble coping with the subject. Because the girl is completely opaque. And to make things worse she is two. And the two end up fighting each other.

The temporal axis is badly messed up. The dream scenes are badly marked. Are they dream or are they any form of magic reality? Who knows. By two thirds into the movie I was quite certain the Writer has no idea at all.

But the worst part is the extra film. And the Director has to fill it with fluff, which he masquerades as mood. One character looking somewhere off screen for no reason other than justify the funding to some state bureaucrats. The scenes are doubled in a pointless manner until you get to see the old Soviet technique of "having something to show".

Contact me with Questions, Comments or Suggestions ryitfork @ bitmail.ch
1 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed