Since Director Tsai Ming-liang has said so, there is no way to give a specific evaluation. When I watched it, I had a similar idea. It was just a good multimedia work of art in the art gallery, and it became a pioneering attempt in the theatre. Maybe 80 minutes is the key to achieving its pioneering nature? In addition, are the barriers of theatres and art galleries really so obvious and must they be broken?
But anyway, Tsai Ming-liang can think of it, can do it, and let everyone see that the film itself has a relatively positive meaning. The movie is a walker series, which is more like an ascetic here. The Buddhist scripture, which is the source of the name of the movie, also explains the content of the film well, that is, do not pray for the result, just do it with your heart.
But anyway, Tsai Ming-liang can think of it, can do it, and let everyone see that the film itself has a relatively positive meaning. The movie is a walker series, which is more like an ascetic here. The Buddhist scripture, which is the source of the name of the movie, also explains the content of the film well, that is, do not pray for the result, just do it with your heart.
