In a Violent Nature (2024) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Chris Nash, DO NOT EVER direct again. Please!
Coventry16 April 2024
If you're a horror fanatic, and your hobby is attending world premieres at bizarre and eccentric genre festivals, you regularly encounter misfires or even downright bad movies. It's inevitable. The trick is to be mild and open-minded, and to look for a few inventive ideas and brief highlights in each film. That usually works when you're an overall tolerant person, ... except in the case of "In A Violent Nature". This film is just irredeemably and infuriatingly awful.

Apparently, writer/director Chris Nash had the brilliant (on paper, perhaps) idea to make a raw back-to-basics 'killer in the woods' slasher movie, but - and here it comes - from the perspective of the heavily disfigured, intellectually underdeveloped, and undead killer. Now, I know what you're thinking. "That actually sounds quite cool". Well, no. Be mindful the gimmick means you're basically just watching how a freak endlessly walks through the woods, makes circles around the cabin, and gazes at teens around the campfire. And I do mean endlessly! 75-80% of the running time is not an exaggeration. The remaining 20% is even duller, though. Old ladies nagging about bears, dumb kids remaining at the massacre site instead of running as far away as possible, and idiotic Rangers staring at the temporarily beaten body of the psycho instead of shooting it full of bullets or hacking it up to pieces.

The only reason why I give one extra point is because there are a handful of creative and excessively gore massacres. Notably the industrial lumberjack-device kill and the sequence in which a poor girl's head is pulled through her own stomach via a meat hook (don't ask...) are impressive. The supreme make-up effects shouldn't come as a surprise since Chris Nash previously worked as effect wizard for films like "Psycho Goreman" and "The Void". He should continue this line of work, and never ever attempt to write or direct another movie himself.
11 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
See the movie poster? There. Now you've seen most of the movie.
jjjunob15 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The first slasher movie to show it from the killer's point of view! But you know why the others don't? Because it's boring. Apparently slashers spend most of their time walking around--in this movie, as the camera follows them. But without the shock and fear and suspense as the victims discover what's happening and try to escape . . . There's just not much there.

As for the backstory, it's the same old "abused kid comes back from the dead to get his revenge."

Is your thing is creative, extreme gore? Then there's something here for you. But in any case, I recommend watching it in a format where you can fast forward through all the 'walking around' scenes. You won't miss a thing, I promise.
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Can't consider this a movie
alecalletto23 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard to review this when it's literally murder porn. The plot was the villain woke up and killed everyone, the end. Not only did the killer rise from the ground due to a teenage girl stealing his necklace, it triggered him so bad he continued on a murder rampage and a walking tour throughout a pre-recorded treadmill video montage. All the people he killed were the most generic horror movie villains. The concept wasn't fresh, new, or original. Please keep all of your necklaces safe. I wouldn't want to trigger any murderous rampage. I wish I could receive all the minutes I watched from this movie back.
13 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed