Paradise (2023) Poster

(I) (2023)

User Reviews

Review this title
102 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Jack of trades, master of none
bored_bingewatcher29 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was entertaining, intriguing and I didn't feel it dragged too long despite its 2 hour runtime. In fact, it should have been double the length, in a 6-episode format. The plot is decent, there is tension and I felt engaged with the characters' struggle and the world they live in. However, various interesting aspects deserved more attention.

1. Theissen (the villain) should've been more explored. She seems really convinced of her invention, or at least able to convince others this is a form of progress and will also help the poor. She didn't seem too driven by greed either, and her true goals are ambiguous. However, due to the mystery in the second half she gets too little screentime.

2. The whole mystery in the second half was an entire film on its own. That was such an interesting setup for psychological drama that it should have been dragged out longer.

3. Adam seemed illogical and I expected there to be a twist to them but they end up being really disappointing.

It's not like these elements make the movie worse, just that there should be more.
49 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting German Sci-fi, not as good as Dark...but still worth watching
cgvsluis9 August 2023
This is a German Sci-Fi film based around the premise that scientists have determined a way to not just extend your life, but buy back your youth. The catch is that your time is coming directly from someone who is DNA compatible with you (I.e. Relatives make a good match and certain ethnic backgrounds are underrepresented). The company who has developed this technology is run like a massive biotech that has Apple like meetings where awards like salesperson of the year are awarded...but the real reason people attend is to hear the CEO speak, a Olivia Theissen. The recipient of the best salesperson award is Max, who we follow throughout the film.

In essence the film is almost a de-evolution of Max's beliefs. In the beginning he is very pro-company and really believes in what they are doing in the most altruistic sense, which is part of what makes him a great salesperson...visiting refugees in a refugee camp and convincing young refugees to donate just 5-10 years for the money to help their entire families immigrate. When his doctor wife is forced to give up 40 years after their home is burnt down...he starts to see things from a different perspective. Meanwhile there is an activist group who believes so strongly against this company and it's practices that they are willing to commit violent crimes like murder.

Interesting from a psychological perspective, I enjoyed this German Sci-fi film...not as much as I enjoyed the Dark series, but I did enjoy it. I think sci-fi fans will think it is a worthy watch, so it gets my recommendation.

My review is based on watching it in it's original German language with English subtitles.
35 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent German sci-fi.
deloudelouvain7 August 2023
I see there are a lot of mixed reviews for this German sci-fi, from people that didn't get it to people that found it clever. Count me in the people that enjoyed this movie, and so did my wife. I thought the plot was interesting, certainly food for thought. The only thing that could have been a bit better was the acting from certain actors but overall it was all pretty decent. I didn't think the plot was complicated at all so I don't get what others didn't understand about the story. The lesson of the movie is don't do to others what you don't want others do to you. If everybody would think about that a bit more, life on earth would be so much better.
26 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Intriguing With More To Give.
icocleric27 July 2023
I loved the issues brought up and how it used a Sci-fi concept to highlight them, and it had some lovely details; but I think it had a bit of a slow build up. Like I feel the pacing of the film would have made an excellent TV series.

I do feel like the concept and the things brought up were very interesting. I also felt there were a lot of side characters who seemed like they had a very interesting stories to tell that were barely touched on.

It was overall interesting, and enjoyable it just had more to give. And I think the film suffered a tiny bit because of that. It was clearly a very well thought out concept.
30 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Germany did it again!
chiaramariecapritta4 August 2023
I think that Germany is a step ahead here in Europe, lots of European production such as the French one or the Italian one are still attached at the old way of doing cinema, such as Nouvelle vague or Neorealism, Germany during these last few years has demonstrated that has a lot to offer, Dark, Kleo, 1989 and now Paradise. It was not a perfect movie, but it was not predictable and it perfectly show how fragile human nature is and how humans way of thinking can change.

The main protagonist really did an amazing job, his character is very well written like the rest of the script. I wouldn't mind if they do a sequel to this movie. If you liked In time, you'll definitely like this one!
33 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lacks profundity
filmbuff92427 July 2023
A rather dull approach to an interesting subject.

Unfortunately, neither of the characters emerge as multi-faceted human beings, they simply pop out of the script like two-dimensional caricatures, and while the cast does its best to bring these personae to life, their hard work can only go so far in carrying a piece that doesn't hold its ground.

With a few plot twists, the movie tries to gain our attention, but they appear predictable by the time we've finished watching the film.

Despite introducing us to a formidable antagonist, the CEO of the evil AEON corporation, who's capable of eliminating innocent lives for her own profits and interest, we don't get to know much about her either, and the whole characterisation falls flat. Neither does her character design present her as a grey shadowed presence, nor does it do much to make the viewer hate her.

Even the opposing fraction ADAM fighting against AEON is led by a woman with firm beliefs, but that side of the story doesn't contribute anything except bodies dropping left and right. It ultimately leaves us with a question - what really was the point of it all, if neither the negative forces leading the controversial ageist agenda had anything to speak for themselves, nor the resistance party trying to reinstate the status quo.

Although classism and ageism are the obvious themes being dealt by the movie, the social commentary in that arena also feels very thin, resulting in merely a crumbling down of the whole idea that could've created a larger than life image, but never does.

Personally, I was looking forward to this release owing to my own cravings of a good science fiction thriller, but again that ship has sailed without leaving me with much to remember in the end.

Unfortunately, Boris Kunz's feature has only resulted in a run-of-the-mill forgettable viewing experience. As much as I wanted to like this one, it didn't really hand out a significantly building up narrative, nor did it lay out worthy character developments. Its sole dark vision of a society falling apart with a classist billion-dollar company set up at the centre only brings out the obvious view of a dystopian setting, but nothing more than that.

Initially, the German film pushes a great deal to cement its foregrounding issues about the socio-economic divide between different classes of society, ageism, relationships, technological advancements overtaking emotional human ground and more.

But in the end, it reels out a dystopian concept merely on the surface, as a selling point. It lacks profundity and fails to ask the right questions.
47 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good premise, disappointing development
Lving-eva5 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This movie started with promising premise and I really like sci-fi like this. It reminds me of In Time (2011) starring Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried, which of course in that movie the transfer of time is much simpler. In this movie, it is a little bit more complicated than that, which involved medical procedures.

I will let you watch that yourselves.

What is greatly disappointing and even to the extent of upsetting, is how the ending turned out to be.

The main character, Max, started the whole thing by kidnapping the lady whom he though is his boss, Sophie, but turned out to be Sophie's daughter, Marie. His intention is to take back the life from Sophie and transfer it back to his wife, Elena.

The disappointing part is, he chickened out. He cannot go through with his plan, even though Marie tried to shoot Elena in her face! Enraged by Marie's action, Elena went through with the plan to take her youth instead. In the process, because of her disagreement with Max, they both went their separate ways. At this point, I don't understand why Max would do that. I mean, what changed?!?!

I get it, they want to show what is morally right, which is what Max intends to do in the end to go public with it, and what is righteous, which is what Elena wants to do because it was revealed that the fire and debt was planned by Sophie all along. Elena wants justice and revenge. Max, chickened out. I felt that there should be other approach because you know what, shortly before the movie ends, they revealed that Max had joined Adam, the activist/rebel group that is against what Aeon is doing.

Just as I think the story could not get any worse, the writer decided to add another hypocrisy to it: Max let his wife live, which is against what Adam stands for.

The writer needs to get their mind straight, for real.

This movie started off promising but the ending just ruined everything.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Potent Tale of Science and Technology Gone Awry Compromised by Familiar Action Thriller Tropes
Turfseer9 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The film is set in a dystopian world where a new gene-altering technology allows individuals to transfer years of their life to others who share suitable DNA matches. These exchanges, termed "donations," lead to exacerbated class divisions, with the wealthy benefiting at the expense of the less privileged. Additionally, a disturbing black market emerges, driven by unscrupulous doctors performing procedures at discounted rates. The most vulnerable, including refugees and children, become targets, further deepening societal divisions.

At the core of the narrative is Donation Manager Max Toma, a rising star in the Aeon Corporation, the pharmaceutical giant overseeing these life-altering donations. The film's strength lies in its exploration of this thought-provoking premise, which raises poignant questions about the ethical implications of tampering with the natural life cycle and exacerbating social inequalities.

Simultaneously, the film introduces the Adam Group, labeled as terrorists but perceived by some as freedom fighters. Lillith, the group's leader, communicates a powerful message after a terrorist attack on Aeon's headquarters. She emphasizes the complicity of ordinary citizens in the face of a growing medical tyranny, which challenges the audience to confront their own complacency.

Max's personal journey takes center stage as his life unravels. A pivotal moment occurs when he and his wife Elena's apartment burns down due to her alleged negligence with a candle. After Insurance refusal, Elena is unable to make good on her pledge to give 40 years of her life as collateral for a loan. When the government seizes her as repayment, Max's world collapses.

In a desperate attempt to retrieve Elena's lost years, Max's makes an unsuccessful appeal to Sophie Thiessen, the CEO of Aeon. The situation is dire, as the court-mandated procedure has aged Elena into an old woman, leaving her desperate for a chance to reclaim her lost youth.

The narrative of "Paradise" takes an unexpected turn, transitioning from its initial thought-provoking premise into the realm of a conventional action thriller. At this juncture, Max Toma emerges as the central figure in a high-stakes plan to recover Elena's stolen years.

Max's transformation into a determined protagonist propels the narrative forward. However, some elements remain unclear, such as how Max deduces that Sophie matches Elena's DNA profile. The intricacies of Max's plan are also shrouded in mystery, including his ability to kidnap someone he believes to be Sophie from a cemetery. Despite these uncertainties, the story maintains its intensity as Max orchestrates a daring scheme.

The urgency of their situation drives them to cross the border into Lithuania, seeking the assistance of an illicit doctor who can perform the forbidden donation procedure on the teenage girl they've abducted. The narrative navigates tense moments, including near misses with border agents and a dramatic shootout between Aeon's shock troops and the Adam Group.

Throughout the narrative, the film explores the complex dynamics between the characters. Max's transformation from a company pawn to a member of the Adam Group at the climax adds depth to his character arc. His internal struggle to reconcile his past actions with his newfound purpose reflects the moral quandary central to the story.

Elena, too, undergoes a profound transformation. Initially reluctant to participate in the kidnapping scheme, her desperation to regain her lost youth compels her to make a chilling decision. The emotional turmoil she experiences highlights the profound ethical dilemmas posed by the gene-altering technology.

The conclusion of "Paradise" raises thought-provoking questions about the characters' fates and the consequences of their actions. Sophie, who survives the shootout by wearing a bulletproof vest, reveals her true nature by callously refusing to return the stolen years to Marie, who is, in fact, her own daughter. Her cold determination to continue seeking (an unlikely) compatible donor exposes the extent of her villainy and obsession with power.

Elena's future, however, remains shrouded in uncertainty and disbelief. Despite surviving the harrowing events, it's hard to imagine how she could simply resume a normal life. She is a wanted woman, pursued not only by Aeon but also by the government. The lack of credibility in her ability to live openly adds a layer of implausibility to her character's resolution.

Max's evolution as a character takes a surprising turn as he aligns himself with the Adam Group. This choice underscores the film's overarching theme, suggesting that the true threat lies within institutions like Aeon and compliant governments. Max's decision to join the group highlights the complex dynamics of power, control, and resistance.

Kostja Ullmann's portrayal of Max stands out among the performances, capturing the essence of a man seeking redemption and change after making morally compromising decisions.

Despite its incorporation of action thriller elements, "Paradise" retains its core as a cautionary tale. The film effectively explores the perils of gene-altering medical technology and the potential collusion between scientific advancements and authoritarian forces. As the characters' stories unfold, the audience is prompted to reflect on the ethical implications of unchecked technological progress and the societal consequences that may arise.
23 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brilliant concept, decent execution.
Top_Dawg_Critic30 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I agree with most other reviews that this story would've made for an excellent multi-episode series, but nevertheless, this was still a solid and engaging dystopian thriller. The five fairly inexperienced filmmakers who produced, wrote and directed this film created a convincing dystopian landscape, with casting and performances that were all excellent and convincing. The cinematography and visual effects were near-perfect, as was the score, and the nearly two hour runtime flew by with decent pacing and the continuously engaging narrative. The last 15 minutes could've been more cohesive and explained better, but considering this international film was put together by newb filmmakers, it was still an impressive little gem, and Netflix once again didn't let us down, especially with the spot-on English dubbing. If you enjoy this genre, you wont be disappointed. It's a well deserved 8/10 from me. Who knows, maybe and hopefully Netflix will expand on this concept and make this into a series - fingers crossed.
95 out of 114 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the best german movies in recent years.
nxxnqzfv27 July 2023
The movie is very captivating and has solid storytelling. The story might work a bit better in a series as there could be more to tell. The theme is very interesting and I wish there was more to see.

German movies mostly cannot compete with international movies but this one is an exception.

This one was definitely a surprise, given Netflix' history of trash content.

For the story:

It is about an employee who works for a german science corporation which can transfer life-time via a medical procedure.

People 'donate' some of their life-time and receive money as compensation.

Can definitely recommend!
35 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
AMAZING concept. HORRIBLE execution
angelestevez-7792919 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS

I'm gonna make this review short and simple.

The ending was garbage. Absolute TRASH.

My man really went through hell throughout the entire movie just for his wife to LEAVE HIM and get pregnant by another guy.

Marie caught so many L's and it's astonishing that Sophie got away with stealing those 40 years and is even worse that she screwed over her daughter.

I also have to add that for the last 30 minutes the story just flips on itself.

Why on earth did his wife just flip flop her feelings on taking 40 years from Marie???

The same goes for the main character.

Save your time, the ending is garbage. God damn.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well done!
kpbpdcrtt27 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, even though I didn't expect that much from a German movie I was sonewhat impressed by the overall plot, the setting, the visual effects and how the actors and actresses did their job. Especially the narrative was interesting and it was a relatively well-written dystopian story. I think the movie definitely succeeds in conveying some interesting social critiques e.g. About class divisions and unequal privileges, our obsession with eternal youth, the exploitation of resources including human beings and their bodies, social media etc.

However, many aspects of this film seemed very generic and somehow reminded my of other Sci-Fi/ dystopian narratives. Also, I was unsatisfied with the ending because it felt too open and in my opinion could have ended in a more sophisticated manner. Nevertheless, I'd definitely say that the movie is worth watching.
67 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Back & Forth
kosmasp1 August 2023
No pun intended - actually one might say puns. But let's not get ahead of ourselves! What is life or a movie if we skip stuff - if we are made to fast forward? Or go back? Time and age wise! There are a lot of questions the movie is asking - very obvious ones (should we sacrifice so called regular folk to enrich our culture with geniuess? Make them live longer?) ... but I would argue that it doesn't really answer them ... it does go off into different directions.

That all being said, this is an intriguing concept ... try not to get hung up on ... well technicalities (again sorry for the pun). This is meant to be ... well meant to be entertainment first, while also giving you food for thought. What would you do? And does every technology benefit the rich? Who can be deemed ... well unnecessary? Isn't every life worth something? Still if someone would want to give away ... there is a whole bag of issues there. One being that person may change their mind ... no backsies I assume.

I like that the filmmakers took a chance and went for it. With Kostja they have a very charismatic lead ... he walks a very line about what he wants, about being a fighter for justice ... and trying to handle what his significant other may want ... all the while playing god of sorts ... there are many twists and turns ... some make more some make less sense ... just suspend your disbelief ...
27 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absurd, characters badly developed, no scientific basis: don't waste your time!
toyko-2454019 November 2023
I feel that the point of sci-fi movies is to have a hint at what science might bring in dystopian futures, on the basis of current research or theories, and with a philosophical background.

Paradise is a failed attempt that I would include in the fantasy genre instead because it fails - it doesn't event try - to explain the scientific basis for this "transfer of youth" from the poor to the elite.

Not only the way they conceptualize it is absurd, but also lacks originality because this "transfer of life time" was already explored in "In Time" in a more credible way.

Characters badly developed and script too stereotypical. What is the contribution of this movie to the sci-fi genre? None.

Don't waste your time.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a mess
It's hard for me to understand how Netflix can allow complete amateurs write movie scripts.

They do it again and again. How can this be a sustainable business model? Put 15 million dollars in a movie based on a script that any 16 years old could have written better.

I mean look at this mess of a script. What is this? Apart from the premise, which is not completely new but interesting, it is just complete garbage. There are no character build ups, there is no dramatic goal, there are not story steps, there isn't even a central conflict, it's just a huge chaos all over the place. None of the characters come even close to touching us. The antagonist has one single encounter with the hero, where they both say one sentence, no conflict. We never learn what motivates her.

The hero saves a woman that doesn't wanna be saved. That's his mission. Then she changes her mind and wants to be saved. Then she changes her mind again, because it would mean to harm an innocent person. Then she changes her mind again and almost kills the girl, sleeps with her husband, and finally decides to betray her husband and take the lifetime of the girl, and also break up and get pregnant from another guy that appeared out of nowhere. Frustrated, her now ex-husband joins the terrorist to kill some more people. Why? We never learn.

It's so bizarre, that it's almost funny. The script actually reminded me of Tommy Wiseau's 2003 film The Room, widely considered the worst film ever made. In this film the actor changes his mind sometimes twice within a scene.

I wonder if the producers come to Netflix with a script so bad, or if the script is okay but Netflix ruins it with their developer team, because they want it to fit their algorithm or whatever.
53 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's OK, but it could have been so much better.
jabandrade17 August 2023
This movie had everything to be great. The premise was good, to say the least, the beginning was exciting, the performances committed and the course chosen pointed in the direction of something really prosperous.

In addition, the ethical issues raised by a group called Adam, which violently opposes the shady methods of manipulating the life span of the poor in exchange for money , run by the AEON company, are extremely valid and provide material for a realistic reflection on a possible future that lies ahead of our time. In fact, this discussion would have been the best thing in the movie if the script had gone down this road.

But halfway through the movie the script becomes a seesaw with so many ups and downs. The story loses its breath and becomes a little lame. It improves a little with the reappearance of the terrorist core Adam, adding some action to the lukewarm script, but it falls off again with poor script choices as the film nears its climax.

When personal moral dilemmas that don't quite fit appear out of nowhere, things turn lukewarm again and the movie goes downhill again. And so it goes until the end. It's not bad and keeps the interest, but good wasted characters and an undefined script about where it wants to go, partially spoil what could have been great. In the end, it leaves a slight hook for a possible continuation.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good premise but weak plot
Alfinx18 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I like the premise that explores some serious social and ethical issues. However the plot is rather weak.

It was established that a close genetic match was required for the procedure. So that meant that the refugees in that illegal operation must be genetically (ethnically) similar to the recipients, right?

Lillith and the Adam group were so dumb with that kidnapping plan. They knew a large armed convoy was coming but didn't even bother with IEDs, snipers etc. Really lame Plan B that wouldn't even have protected them from the enemy. Obviously they got slaughtered.

Was it even likely that a lit table candle could've burn down a supposedly high end apartment? The insurance company was probably corrupt but should have come up with a more plausible story.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Paradise
snoducky22 March 2024
Nothing new, nothing special.

Through this movie there's just a hint of trying too hard and being overly dramatic. The movie adds unnecessary tension which is prolonged through the entirety of the film. The concept behind the film is something new however the way it's filmed just devalues the idea. The acting wasn't bad, good enough to keep the movie afloat. The start was pretty engaging and hooked the audience however the hook slowly became more and more blunt until the movie became a boring and repetitive mess. It's sad to see such a good idea go to waste but hopefully this movie or idea gets interpreted in a clearer and more appealing way.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty good
mrwildgoose10 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It's a good, good movie. Except for the implausible central premise. You can't just take away someone's years and transfer them to someone else. Maybe they should have worked on that part a bit more - perhaps around telomerase enzymes or something?

Also inexplicable was the sudden, abrupt change of heart of the male protagonist, at the end. It didn't make any sense, especially since the female lead had not only saved the girl's life once, but the girl had attempted to kill her point blank once. That makes her owe the doctor some years definitely. It isn't as if the girl would die. Her mom would get her a donor anyway. I liked the absolute steely resolve of the doctor there, and her self love.

Apart from this, the movie covers most bases. It's well thought out. Good performances. And I adored the love story. It just didn't need to end.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unexpectedly very good
INTXb6 August 2023
I really wasn't expecting something quite as good based on the putrid 6.3/10 rating on IMDb. The production, acting, premise, are all really good. The sci-fi story is very interesting though pretty linear and mostly predictable. With that said I was fully captivated throughout the entire movie and I'm one that gets antsy easily. I haven't seen any of the actors before but they all played their parts very well and were fully convincing in their parts. I would definitely watch a part 2 of this movie if one is made. The only reason I think this movie didn't get a higher review is the subtitles and the fact that it doesn't have a single A-list actor from Hollywood.
48 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting concept lacks deep implementation
paul-allaer1 September 2023
As "Paradise" (2023 release from Germany; 118 min) opens, we are introduced to Max, a "donation manager" for Aeon, which literally buys time from people for money, lots of money. (In the opening scene, am 18 yo is offered EUR 700K for 5 years of his life). Then the irony: when the condo that Max and his wife Elena own burns down, they owe the rest of the mortgage. Elena is forced to donate 38 years of her life...

Couple of comments: this is the latest from German director Boris Kunz. Here he looks at the moral dilemma: how to value the amount of time in your life. In and of itself this could make for an interesting concept, but for whatever reason it doesn't feel well implemented in this movie. The movie's first hour just crawls by, and although things get a little better in the second hour, it feels like this is a wasted opportunity. And I'm not even mentioning the very end of the movie, which had me baffled.

"Paradise" started streaming on Netflix last weekend, and Netflix suggested it to me based on my viewing habits. If you are in the mood for a weird-ish sci-fi that has some interesting concepts but lacks a deep implementation, I'd readily suggest you check this out, and draw your own conclusion.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Fantastic beginning and middle, Terrible and Lazy ending.
robwestgate-3978914 August 2023
Fantastic beginning and middle, terrible and lazy ending. Three quarters of the way though this movie, it became extremely confusing and then nothing was making sense! The ending left so many loose ends and I was extremely unsatisfied. I feel like the movie never ended. I am left empty, like a kid who just dropped his ice cream and never gets another. I think the writers ran out of time, making up whatever to get the movie finished. Terrible, terrible ending. I feel like calling Netflix and asking for my money back. I feel like someone who bites into a sandwich and finds out it's just bread. Extremely disappointed! I would love for there to be an alternate ending.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
fresh idea, entertaining
ayesha_lea5 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Really great thought provoking movie. Acting is solid, directing well done. Some interesting twists and unexpected direction of some characters. Great at raising the whole ethical question of yet another way the wealthy can take advantage of those in need. Also the whole issue of corruption. No matter how "well intended" any concept of "allowing" the poor to benefit by aiding the rich, there will always be a larger, more insidious and greedy aspect underlying the public image of the process. Corruption and selfishness will always win, people will always use any means possible for their own personal gain. A really good watch, no slow moments, not drawn out. Tells the story fully and succinctly.
18 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Why is it named Paradise?
francinejlee6 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Honestly I saw this on Netflix and taught man the rating is a little low but since it's a German film I taught it might be interesting.

I have to say I like how this is talking about time in a movie. It features just a few characters that you will know but it doesn't go into too much detail.

I like how it wasn't super confusing to follow and the time line of this doesn't seem bad. I really didn't think if was a horrible movie.

To me it seemed nice and uniquely different. If you are a fan of time, also some gun fighting and action this is a pretty ok movie!

Imagine if we could give our years to other people, that is one mind-blown idea to me.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's okayish
mrmarcoblevins17 September 2023
It's okay to watch. I'd normally give it a 6 or 7 out of 10, but what i totally disliked were some dialogs which only existed to explain a dilemma or present moral viewpoints to the viewer. Just leave it to the viewer to interpret things instead of forcing it too much. So the points drop to an annoyed 5 out of 10, although it has some nice build ups and tension.

How this landed in some countries netflix top tens is a riddle to me or just showcases how the quality of Netflix shows is taking a deep dive. My subsription is only kept since my wife insists on some shows.

The best one I found during the last few months was the french sow tapie.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed