On of the worst Belgium movies , Bad acting bad story , boring actors , waste of time , happy that this movie was for free , as a avant première movie , after a half hour nobody in the cinema seems to laugh with every scène, what was the mening of this movie? To make some people laugh? Not! To be scared? Not! Next time better, try IT another time with good actors and a good story , for now rubbish.
5 Reviews
Not as bad as some of these reviews claim it to be
tijskenswim9 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I could be harsh on this one over some disturbing aspects.
The first half hour of the film was exactly that: If my thougts were to be spoken out loud, it would have been "Oh, come on, can't they think of anything better?" But after that, things got a little more solid.
PROS:
However, there sure were some CONS too:
E.g.: The daughter of the antagonist appears to have suffered from the image these influencers gave her, which eventually led to pulling her down in SOME sort of way. Nonetheless, we have no clue of what exactly happened to her...
Overall, I do feel like watching this movie again some day, although it won't be remembered for being a milestone in the Belgian horror scene.
A missed opportunity, no doubt.
The first half hour of the film was exactly that: If my thougts were to be spoken out loud, it would have been "Oh, come on, can't they think of anything better?" But after that, things got a little more solid.
PROS:
- Locations: There was a large forest, a cabin within in it, as well as some sort of villa. All three added up well to the story.
- Atmosphere: Most of the killing scenes were genuinely creepy, in terms of a slasher movie. The antagonist was - luckily so - among the most interesting characters. His threat felt firm and persistent.
- Gore: This must be the movie's biggest appeal. All kills and wounds that go with it were well executed, edgy, and some even pretty creative. I approved this in particular.
However, there sure were some CONS too:
- Story: Or well, the lack of it. None of the antagonist's motives were really clarified, nor was their corporation with some of their innocent colleagues, or the whole set up.
E.g.: The daughter of the antagonist appears to have suffered from the image these influencers gave her, which eventually led to pulling her down in SOME sort of way. Nonetheless, we have no clue of what exactly happened to her...
- Dialogues: These were very poor. Intended jokes didn't really get a punchline. Serious dialogues were not convincing either.
- Acting: Most of the characters felt very unnatural, even if it was partly due to the poor script.
- Pace: It's a real shame they chose to use constant cross cuts between locations over and over again, taking away a lot of tension and momentum. Post-production killed the pace this way.
Overall, I do feel like watching this movie again some day, although it won't be remembered for being a milestone in the Belgian horror scene.
A missed opportunity, no doubt.
Well, if we...
Mrimreview7 July 2022
If we look at the overall, I can not see how this is something that is supposed to be good.
The drone shots and the color grading is okay, but from the first scene you can really feel that this is a cheap budget production with a lot of (paying?) brands in it. The movements and how they kill could have been better. Also the story does not really tell much about the characters. Quite boring soundtrack, you do not feel any horror.
The drone shots and the color grading is okay, but from the first scene you can really feel that this is a cheap budget production with a lot of (paying?) brands in it. The movements and how they kill could have been better. Also the story does not really tell much about the characters. Quite boring soundtrack, you do not feel any horror.
Flemish Horror
wim-jochems29 June 2022
Forget "likes"... How many "kills" is what really matters!
Coventry26 March 2024
Yours truly was born in the early 80s and grew up in the careless and largely anti-digital 90s. With only two blunt statements, I can illustrate that I probably wasn't part of the target audience for this film. Number one: until I looked it up, I had no idea what the title meant. Apparently, it stands for "fear of missing out" and describes a bizarre social media condition that we, nineties kids, didn't have to worry about. Number two: I honestly can't understand the phenomenon of "influencers". In my view - and I know I'm old - it's not a job, and they are the most useless people in the world. What makes anyone think he/she is important or interesting enough to share his/her thoughts and selfies with the world?
Anyway, there are nevertheless a few aspects with which "FOMO" attracted my attention. I'm a tremendous fan of old-fashioned 80s-styled horror/slasher movies, for starters, and I also have a profound fondness for movies made in my own beloved home country of Belgium (and, more particularly, in Flanders). So, when I found out "FOMO" is a combo of both, and that it revolves around dim-witted, self-centered, and disposable influencers brutally getting butchered in and around a remote cabin in the woods, I simply had to see it.
I can't quite figure out why "FOMO" has such a low rating (currently 3/10) around here. Sure, it isn't a masterpiece of cinema, but it's reasonably well-made, hugely entertaining, and - most importantly - it ticks all the mandatory boxes of a genuine slasher. There's the remote setting, a psycho with a cool mask (digital smiley-faces), nasty and blood-soaked kills (scalping, beheading, throat-slitting, bludgeoning, ...), and - as said before - clueless victims you don't really care if they live or die. Even the concept is good: the ten most popular influencers of the country are taken to a remote location, supposedly to partake in a big TV/Social Media contest. On the tour bus they are still lusciously vlogging and streaming, but at the cabin they promptly must hand over their mobile phones and the pleasant ambience rudely changes. During the "assignments", the group painfully learns they have been lured out by a deranged killer with an even bigger hatred for influencers than I do.
The set-up of "FOMO" is rather unusual. The film ends abruptly and unresolved, like many slashers do, but instead of a sequel there came four TV-episodes of approximately half an hour each. The episodes aren't mini-slasher movies, though. The tone and format change and suddenly it becomes a mix between torture-porn, crazed dysfunctional families, and sick mind-games. Personally, I like straightforward slashing a lot more, and the episodes feel quite redundant. They also haven't been added (yet?) on IMDb.
Anyway, there are nevertheless a few aspects with which "FOMO" attracted my attention. I'm a tremendous fan of old-fashioned 80s-styled horror/slasher movies, for starters, and I also have a profound fondness for movies made in my own beloved home country of Belgium (and, more particularly, in Flanders). So, when I found out "FOMO" is a combo of both, and that it revolves around dim-witted, self-centered, and disposable influencers brutally getting butchered in and around a remote cabin in the woods, I simply had to see it.
I can't quite figure out why "FOMO" has such a low rating (currently 3/10) around here. Sure, it isn't a masterpiece of cinema, but it's reasonably well-made, hugely entertaining, and - most importantly - it ticks all the mandatory boxes of a genuine slasher. There's the remote setting, a psycho with a cool mask (digital smiley-faces), nasty and blood-soaked kills (scalping, beheading, throat-slitting, bludgeoning, ...), and - as said before - clueless victims you don't really care if they live or die. Even the concept is good: the ten most popular influencers of the country are taken to a remote location, supposedly to partake in a big TV/Social Media contest. On the tour bus they are still lusciously vlogging and streaming, but at the cabin they promptly must hand over their mobile phones and the pleasant ambience rudely changes. During the "assignments", the group painfully learns they have been lured out by a deranged killer with an even bigger hatred for influencers than I do.
The set-up of "FOMO" is rather unusual. The film ends abruptly and unresolved, like many slashers do, but instead of a sequel there came four TV-episodes of approximately half an hour each. The episodes aren't mini-slasher movies, though. The tone and format change and suddenly it becomes a mix between torture-porn, crazed dysfunctional families, and sick mind-games. Personally, I like straightforward slashing a lot more, and the episodes feel quite redundant. They also haven't been added (yet?) on IMDb.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
