Geico commercials are considered the worst advertising dreck ever created. There is no originality, no creativity, and absolutely no thought put into any of their commercials; take two opposite things, like a cow and a coal mine, put them together and that's supposed to be creative. A 6th grader could write them, and maybe they did.
Now on to "K. C. F. H." I've watched all three. I get it; I mean, it's not rocket surgery. Whilst the "off-set" story is somewhat interesting, my main criticism is with the "Sit-Com" segments. Mainly, it's just inexcusably lazy writing. Yes, unfunny, formulaic, one-dimensional, by-the-numbers gruel truly does write itself, believe it or not.
I can write the "Sit-Com" segments. YOU can write the sit-com segments. Even Geico advertising executives can write the sit-com segments, and that's terrifying. It's fill-in-the-blanks. Now, if over time, they slowly phased out the "sit-com" segments (the premise is established, no need to keep bludgeoning the audience with a bad idea, like the "Cavemen"), then it might work, as the "off-set" story does have the potential to stand on its' own. However, tonight's "sit-com" seemed to go on longer than the first two. Or maybe it just felt that way.
If I were to guess, the writers spend 5% of the time mindlessly filling in the "sit-com" blanks (or they hand it off to one, like, "intern") and 95% of the time on the "off-set" material. May I suggest having the running time of the two segments reflect that.