"Route 66" ...Shall Forfeit His Dog and Ten Shillings to the King (TV Episode 1963) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/22/63 "Shall Forfeit His Dog and Ten Shillings to the King"
schappe14 November 2015
This one takes palace in Arizona and uses the old western plot of a posse where the hero suspects, (correctly), that some members of the posse don't want to take the fugitives alive for reasons of their own. I've always thought that modern westerns should be successful on TV because they can use all the plots available to a western but also to a modern series.

Tod agrees to go on the posse because his employer has been killed in a robbery. Also along are James Brown, in his fifth appearance, each time as a lawman, playing the local sheriff; Med Flory as his disgruntled deputy, Steve Cochran as a friend of the victim and the "best tracker in the territory", an Indian who probably deserves that title more, Kathleen Crowley as the victim's much younger wife and John Anderson as a retired military officer with a heart condition who wants to prove he's still got it. Each has his own, selfish motives for what they do and Tod, at the end of it, winds up vowing that their selfishness and violence won't turn him into one of them.

Unlike other reviewers I didn't see any politics in this, just a conflict between good and evil within the human spirit. Here's what Tod says at the end: "Can people only make themselves important at the expense of others? These killings…were they sacrifices to a private reason…to a hidden God? Do people really think that if they go through life without hurting other people nobody will know they've been alive?"

George Maharis is still being listed in the credits but it's hard to tell what role he would have played here. I'm going to take a wild guess and suggest it might be the woman Tod talks to at the beginning who questions why he feels he has to go on this posse. Buz was always questioning why they would get involved in other people's problems. He always had a sixth sense about where the trouble might come from. Maybe they took his lines and gave it to a new character, a piano playing girlfriend of Tod's.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
What's Wrong with a Good Old "Shoot-Em-Up?"
lrrap28 December 2019
This episode has all the elements of a good, old-style crime drama: a double murder, robbery, a patchwork posse chasing the bad guys in the desert, a couple of shifty characters who are not really what they seem, some cat-and-mouse gunplay up in the rocks, etc.....

So why can't Sterling Silliphant and friends just LEAVE IT ALONE and occasionally write a more-or-less standard drama with few, if any, philosophical strings attached? NO-- I guess it was too much to ask, considering the demand for " meaningful statements" by the social elites of early '60's.

What seems to be a pretty straightforward "shoot-em-up" becomes pointlessly weighed down with Silliphant's phony psycho-goop, as Martin Milner undergoes (yet another) angst-ridden, moral dilemma, needlessly pondering his existence and his role in the Universe, etc etc.. FOR PETE'S SAKE-- just join the posse, go out, shoot some bad dudes, and have a good time. Stop the damn', tortured brooding for once and give the viewer a break from the "messaging"---just this once.

And what's with "Jeannie"-- Tod's pseudo-conscience--with that cheesy electric nightclub organ? And the episode's TITLE? Now, WHAT in the world is that supposed to mean? Just something to confuse us rubes who aren't tuned in to the increasingly artsy, intentionally obscure pretensions of this series?

LR
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Muddled message about vengeance and justice
tarmcgator22 April 2013
I'm really becoming hooked on the reruns of ROUTE 66 on ME TV. This episode, unfortunately, suffers from a rather muddled script, or one that was severely edited, as though producer/writer Stirling Silliphant had intended this story to be presented as two one-hour episodes. Instead, it was squeezed into one.

The opening sequences, in which two gunmen murder two other men, are rather cryptic about some of the characters, notably the General (John Anderson) and one of the murder victims, and there is a pointed exchange between Tod and a character called "Jeannie" (Barbara Shelley) which lacks a preface. They talk about Tod's real reasons for going with the posse in pursuit of the murderers, but what's not shown is Tod's previous conversation with Hank Saxon (Steve Cochran) about the need to find and kill the murders. It's only briefly mentioned, and then Jeannie disappears.

I suspect that the central message seems muddled because Silliphant, or whoever edited his teleplay, started out to make a statement about vengeance, then wound up downplaying the vengeful eagerness of Saxon to kill the murderers himself rather than bring them back for trial. The Sheriff (James Brown) alludes to that bloodlust, but, as Tod discovers, Cochran has other motives for wanting to kill the criminals. His desire for revenge is only a sham, but one that's accepted by the rest of the posse. The General also appears eager to shoot the criminals first and question them later, but he at least displays a bit of reserve and a brief willingness to take them alive. His violent intentions are more rational and public-spirited than Saxon's, but still vengeful.

Tod's big revelation at episode's end is, as presented, overwrought and out of proportion. He's appalled by the chaotic violence the murderers inflict in the opening sequence but even more appalled that "law and order" can only respond with vengeance and, thus, more violence. He sees that "an eye for an eye" can only lead to blindness, as they say. Unfortunately, it's an anti-vengeance (not so much anti-violence) message that's not very well conveyed in this episode.

And what's with the dog? They greyhound tie-in isn't very effective either.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hollywood Left Wing Agenda Mars Story, Sullies Tod.
AudioFileZ5 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Tod is working at a dog racing track/resort motel in Apache Junction Arizona. It's pretty desolate, but retired wealthy owner Al Kirk and his young wife Diana spend the racing season catering to out of town high-rollers who want to get away and make some healthy wagers. Seems like an idyllic way to enjoy retirement while padding the bottom line at the same time.

Kirk's trainer, Hank Saxon, sees opportunity too. Saxon has his eyes set on Kirk's beautiful wife. Saxon manipulates two low-life's to rob Kirk prior to one of the race days on the first of the month when the safe is flush with cash. The two thugs kill Kirk and flee with the money. Seems like your standard criminals plying their trade, but Apache Arizona is like an old west town and when the criminals ditch their car fleeing into the wilderness a posse ala' the old west is assembled and ensues to enact justice. The posse is a disparate group each one with their own sense of justice unified by anger. Or is it, besides the Sheriff, played by the always good James Brown, the other leader is none other than the crime's perpetrator Hank Saxon. Of course, at this point in the story the viewer isn't privy to Saxon's involvement which is for the good.

As the hunt continues the group beds for the night. Saxon pulls a solo nighttime scouting mission where he secretly meets up with the two murderers telling them he'll return for them with horses at different times and they'll all go their own way. As he returns to the camp one of the posse is an actual Apache Indian, and though he's silent, he saw Saxon meet the two robbers and is on to him. Still, he say's nothing leading the viewer's to believe discrimination runs both ways and deep too. It's left to imagine he knows no one would believe him in comparison to Saxon so he must wait and watch. An old US Calvary General provides some added color as no one seems to give him the respect he's due, instead treating him as if he's a menace both in age and his sense of justice due without the cursory trial our modern civilized society mandates. Early the next morning, Ms. Kirk is come hither ed by Saxon who we guess tells her he can lead her to the thugs. Viewers start to assume she may be in on the whole criminal charade as she heads out with Saxon with only the Indian realizing they're up to something. Saxon and Ms. Kirk find the first of the robbers and Saxon offers the gun to Ms. Kirk so she can have her own brand of justice and appear as the "good wife". She stalls and Saxon murders the one robber allowing her to say she did it when they return to camp. She stays behind and the others embark to find the other robber. After fanning out Tod and The General come up on the lone murderer/robber. Sensing he is going to be killed he throws his weapon down and approaches Tod whereby he admits to being Saxon's lackey. Saxon comes upon them and shoots the robber hoping to pre-empt any loose lipped talk before it starts if the robber is taken alive. The General witnesses the entire thing and realizes what Saxon is up to. Saxon flees for cover and a gun fight between Saxon and The General ensues. The General bids his time under cover and gets a bead on Saxon and kills him. Tod seems enraged even though Saxon would have likely shot him too. The Indian rides up and proclaims a deep truism that The General is like him, but is was his father's undoing in the annals of history.

What the heck is being said here? I thought with the scenic backdrop and shades of the old west that the entertainment quotient would be up there, but it wasn't. The convoluted story was trying to say something about the darkness of mankind and how violence and guns aren't the answer because people use them to serve up unfair justice for their own self-glorification and mis-guided interests. Tod is appalled and so am I as whatever left-wing crap this was trying to push it overshadowed the story of three thugs murdering two innocent people in cold-blood for monetary gain. So, I did watch it all so I guess it wasn't completely a failure, but in the end the writers in striving to make the big statement did not even reveal if the wife was complacent in the whole affair. BTW, in this episode I like The General a hell of a lot more than the usual affable Tod. Not a particularly recommended episode and the biggest mis-step of all the episodes up to this point.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Mess
dougdoepke18 February 2016
Tod joins a modern day posse that's tracking down two escaped killers. Trouble is the posse's full of people with conflicting aims.

Oh my, there must be a good reason why this episode is such a mess. The main fault is with the screenplay that has more holes than grandma's sieve. My guess is the producers had to scramble now that Maharis had firmly left the series. (IMDB observes this was the last entry to give Maharis billing.) So I'm thinking they scrambled with a couple of re-writes that may have plugged Buzz's hole but added all kinds of crippling plot lapses. At the same time, I'm mindful that R66 was generally one of the best- written shows of the time.

Looks like the entry wants to say something existential about posses in general— catch Tod's histrionic denunciation that ends the hour, at least I think that's his point. Anyway, for a series that usually managed to avoid the unsubtle, this is like a car horn at a concert. Then too, for a series that tried to present real-type people,The General (Anderson) comes across more like a caricature than a real person. No need to go on. After all, every lengthy series has its missteps, and this is sure one of them.

(In passing—the credits list Apache Jct., AZ as the location, so those are the Superstition Mountains in the background. Too bad the story couldn't work in something about the Superstition's Lost Dutchman Mine, one of the West's more fascinating legends.)
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
sleeper zzzzzzz
twisted6829 September 2011
I was a little offended with the Hollywood liberal spin. Before the the peace movement, Hollywood producers were already laying the groundwork for anti-guns and men of valor. Route 66; this episode especially is a sleeper. i was bored watching it and the only thing that stuck was the hidden anti-violence message. bringing in fugitives or defending yourself against a corrupt deputy is not unnecessary violence. it shouldn't be frowned against but accepted as necessary as real justice. Its not easy enforcing the law and it is very stressful. the producers of this show were only driving wedges between real justice and their own imaginations.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed