"Petticoat Junction" Is There a Doctor in the Roundhouse? (TV Episode 1963) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Was This An Original Binge Series?
TheFearmakers10 January 2019
This show's great. Watching it feels like binging. Was this the original binge comedy series? So far the entire show's been set around the railroad company trying to shut down the hotel which isn't just the show's theme but a sustained, serialized plot, and it's awesome. Continuing with Roy Roberts as the hobo who's really the railroad president helping out where only last episode he initially wanted to shut things down. One of those "We Got A Problem" episodes and that's about it, but it's good, as is the series so far. The hot sisters want a dance to happen but it won't unless... the problem's solved. The only bad thing of the entire series is knowing two out of three of them will be gone by Season Three. Then again, there were tons of episodes per season, so...
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Starting to Wear out His Welcome
darryl-tahirali21 March 2022
How much can you squeeze out of a comedic premise, particularly the mistaken-identity trope that was already collecting dust by the time "Petticoat Junction" got hold of it?

This gentle, innocent situation comedy was determined to find out with "Is There a Doctor in the Roundhouse?" which finds Norman Curtis (Roy Roberts), the "hobo" freeloading at Kate Bradley's Shady Rest Hotel who is actually the president of the C & FW Railroad--and who was trying to mothball the Hooterville Cannonball until he found out how much fun it was to drive it himself--still hanging around Hooterville Valley, to the chagrin of Uncle Joe Carson.

In fact, Norman was having so much fun that he broke the throttle on the Cannonball trying to show off going up Bleeker's Hill, as Charley Pratt and Floyd Smoot report back at the Shady Rest, which is preparing for the valley's jamboree, now threatened with cancelation since, with the Cannonball the only viable way to get to the hotel, no one will be able to get there. And with the steam-powered locomotive a museum piece already--they stopped making that kind of throttle a half-century earlier--it seems unlikely that the Cannonball can be repaired.

So, was this deliberate sabotage on Norman's part? He says he was trying to arrange having a flatcar attached to the Cannonball to bring even more guest to the jamboree--but can you really trust these city slickers, anyway? Particularly those looking to shut down the train service in the first place?

There's the situation in this episode of your situation comedy, with Ed James and Seaman Jacobs's script plumbing it for all it's worth. Norman sincerely wants to remedy the situation and, relying on his connections to the old-boy networks, calls in some high-powered, albeit now-retired, talent to help him repair the Cannonball, but when they arrive in grubby clothes to start the dirty work, they're mistaken for Norman's fellow hobos instead of the former captains of industry (and one former Air Force general) they really are.

To provide context for contemporary viewers, when "Petticoat Junction" first aired, the Great Depression of the 1930s was still a vivid event for older viewers drawn to the show and its suggestions of bygone days. (And likely for younger viewers with better historical memories than we have now.) Men, particularly older men, fallen on hard economic times often "rode the rails" (stowed away on trains without paying) and congregated in "hobo jungles" often located near railroad tracks. Older viewers who were movie fans quite likely got a kick out of seeing Norman's pals played by long-time character actors Douglass Dumbrille, Charles Meredith, and Addison Richards.

Roberts, an industry veteran himself, is the star of "Is There a Doctor in the Roundhouse?" which finds ample opportunity for the denizens of Hooterville Valley, particularly stubborn Uncle Joe, to doubt his Norman as he tries to prove who he really is as this dusted-off premise, already familiar to viewers at the time, plays out in predictably comforting fashion.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed