Lolita is a rebel and she's going to share to our wide open eyes some little sex stories, between sci-fi and fantasy... Well, this Surrender Cinema production is not very good: very bad acting, horrifying music and a story line without any story and any line. BUT, the sex scenes are pretty well done, lot of lesbian scenes, and Jacqueline Lovell, as beautiful as in The Exotic House Of Wax, offer to us a very good final and very hot strip show. For Lovell's fans only.
10 Reviews
Lolita (Hot) 2000 (Minutes of your life gone or at least feels like it)
barnthebarn16 December 2008
Cybil Richards directs another Full Moon/Surrender Cinema masterpiece of erotica. This time Jacqualine Lovell (dressed in rather fetching silver outfit) is tasked with destroying all evidence of sexual activity. However she can't resist watching the tapes and she kinda likes them. The sex scenes are well filmed and set to a superb soundtrack (at least for this sort of film). The cast are largely awful and mainly very average looking too. Jacqueline Lovell is her exceptionally attractive self and between viewing the sex files she manages to expose her chest and fumble a little down below. She also fits in a little lesbian activity. To be honest Lovell deserves so much better than this kind of fare. Here she looks great naked but actually is much more appealing in her silver attire narrating the 'drama'. Utterly rubbish movie with Lovell and soundtrack the only real redeeming features. Mediocre even for Surrender's output and clearly a new budget low for them also.
At Least The Female Cast Are Hot
Theo Robertson14 August 2004
Thankfully the only dodgy thing about LOLITA 2000 is the title . Come to think of it it`s a really stupid title for a soft core porn movie which may turn off a potential audience , but take it from me that the cast are well above the age of consent . I should know because watched this movie over and over again , made a note of the cast members names , typed them into an internet search engine to find out their dates of births and I can confirm it`s all above board . We`re not talking Traci Lords here
As you`d expect in these type of movies there`s a very basic premise that`s just an excuse to show some soft core sex , but LOLITA 2000 is better than most simply because the cast look like they might actually be having sex , and boy are the actresses fit with special mention going to Gabriella Hall
If I have any complaints it`s to do with the sound cutting out during the sex scenes to be replaced by muzak which is my main gripe about all these soft core movies . But I musn`t grumble too much because the cast are hot which is not something I can say about many hard core movies
As you`d expect in these type of movies there`s a very basic premise that`s just an excuse to show some soft core sex , but LOLITA 2000 is better than most simply because the cast look like they might actually be having sex , and boy are the actresses fit with special mention going to Gabriella Hall
If I have any complaints it`s to do with the sound cutting out during the sex scenes to be replaced by muzak which is my main gripe about all these soft core movies . But I musn`t grumble too much because the cast are hot which is not something I can say about many hard core movies
Another one of the early Surrender Cinema must have videos.
dbrown-0702047 October 2003
Lolita 2000 ranks up there with Virtual Encounters 1, Virtual Encounters 2, and Femalien as one of the "must have" softcore videos that Surrender Cinema released in the last half of the 1990's.
This is what softcore is supposed to be. The women are beautiful, the sex scenes are plentiful, and the action stops just short of actual hardcore. My favorites scenes were the prison cell lesbians and the totally gratuitous encounter between the 1950's lovers in the diner.
This is an easy recommendation.
This is what softcore is supposed to be. The women are beautiful, the sex scenes are plentiful, and the action stops just short of actual hardcore. My favorites scenes were the prison cell lesbians and the totally gratuitous encounter between the 1950's lovers in the diner.
This is an easy recommendation.
Where's The Road Map?
monsters from the id16 December 1999
Everything about this movie is a muddle, starting with the title, which appears in distribution as both "Lolita:2000" and "O Lita:2000". (Given that the millennium is just around the corner, 2000 seems like a quaint choice for evoking the world of the future.)
We enter the studio of a space-age DJ, spinning platters and cyber-broadcasting erotic adventures, like some pirate radio station off the coast of Baja. Our hostess is the lovely and ever-uninhibited Jacqueline Lovell, in silver shorts and halter-top, wiggling her behind as The Shape Of Things To Come.
The first episode stars Taylor St. Claire as a woman trapped in a nightmarish world of recovered memory and alien abduction. There's really not much to this episode: it has a beginning, a middle, and an end...not necessarily in that order. And we get to see a fair amount of the naked and luscious Taylor St Claire, even if her performance is in the key of Hysteria.
In the bridge between this episode and the next, the camera meanders into the broadcast studio and, like some spooky voyeur, silently watches Jacqueline and another woman fondle and undress each other. When our two space lovers finally notice the camera (and presumably us), they scramble for their clothes and the moment is gone. I do have to admit that Jacqueline's surprise is so convincing that I really wondered if the director had interrupted an unscripted moment. Like much of this movie, everything seems to happen by accident.
The second episode is the simplest and most cohesive of the three and has the best of the erotic scenes. Our fearless heroine is a swaggering space pirate, like a blonde Bruce Willis, cracking wise to her alien captors and having sex with anyone in the neighborhood: with another human prisoner (male), with her alien cell-mate (female) and even with her alien captor (also female). The sex scenes are long and well-done, even if the lighting, meant to evoke the dark, claustrophobic confines of the prison, can be a bit distracting.
I did have a difficult time in matching the players in this scene with the names in the final credits. Was our blonde space jockey named Juno? And was she played by the elusive Lisa Sutton AKA Lisa Comshaw AKA Tori or Tory Sinclair AKA Fawna? Well, you get the idea. My only real success was identifying the alien cell-mate, played by the voluptuous and oddly-named J. Nichole Italiano-Zaza, (better known as Nikki Nova.)
Last, we have the most muddled of the episodes as we follow some poor schmuck lost in the Time Machine, travelling from the present year back to the 50's, and then fast-forwarding to some future dystopian Mad Max scenario and finally back in history to the days of the cave-man. I abandoned any hope of continuity or logic and just enjoyed the ample displays of naked flesh. The scene finally comes to an end, more by running out of steam than through any plot device.
And as the movie lurches towards the exit, we are finally rewarded for our patience, watching Jacqueline Lovell slowly strip to some perky, futuristic Musak, with neither the camera nor Jacqueline shy about providing us with some clinical glimpses of her anatomy. Credits finally roll and we see out-takes of the cave-man scenes and listen to someone off-camera give directions and then finally call for a lunch break. The director was apparently reluctant to waste any footage and so we have a movie that feels as cobbled-together as Dr. Frankenstein's creation.
My advice is simply to remember that it's late at night and there's probably nothing else on. So relax, enjoy the abundant nudity, and don't search for deeper meanings. There aren't any.
We enter the studio of a space-age DJ, spinning platters and cyber-broadcasting erotic adventures, like some pirate radio station off the coast of Baja. Our hostess is the lovely and ever-uninhibited Jacqueline Lovell, in silver shorts and halter-top, wiggling her behind as The Shape Of Things To Come.
The first episode stars Taylor St. Claire as a woman trapped in a nightmarish world of recovered memory and alien abduction. There's really not much to this episode: it has a beginning, a middle, and an end...not necessarily in that order. And we get to see a fair amount of the naked and luscious Taylor St Claire, even if her performance is in the key of Hysteria.
In the bridge between this episode and the next, the camera meanders into the broadcast studio and, like some spooky voyeur, silently watches Jacqueline and another woman fondle and undress each other. When our two space lovers finally notice the camera (and presumably us), they scramble for their clothes and the moment is gone. I do have to admit that Jacqueline's surprise is so convincing that I really wondered if the director had interrupted an unscripted moment. Like much of this movie, everything seems to happen by accident.
The second episode is the simplest and most cohesive of the three and has the best of the erotic scenes. Our fearless heroine is a swaggering space pirate, like a blonde Bruce Willis, cracking wise to her alien captors and having sex with anyone in the neighborhood: with another human prisoner (male), with her alien cell-mate (female) and even with her alien captor (also female). The sex scenes are long and well-done, even if the lighting, meant to evoke the dark, claustrophobic confines of the prison, can be a bit distracting.
I did have a difficult time in matching the players in this scene with the names in the final credits. Was our blonde space jockey named Juno? And was she played by the elusive Lisa Sutton AKA Lisa Comshaw AKA Tori or Tory Sinclair AKA Fawna? Well, you get the idea. My only real success was identifying the alien cell-mate, played by the voluptuous and oddly-named J. Nichole Italiano-Zaza, (better known as Nikki Nova.)
Last, we have the most muddled of the episodes as we follow some poor schmuck lost in the Time Machine, travelling from the present year back to the 50's, and then fast-forwarding to some future dystopian Mad Max scenario and finally back in history to the days of the cave-man. I abandoned any hope of continuity or logic and just enjoyed the ample displays of naked flesh. The scene finally comes to an end, more by running out of steam than through any plot device.
And as the movie lurches towards the exit, we are finally rewarded for our patience, watching Jacqueline Lovell slowly strip to some perky, futuristic Musak, with neither the camera nor Jacqueline shy about providing us with some clinical glimpses of her anatomy. Credits finally roll and we see out-takes of the cave-man scenes and listen to someone off-camera give directions and then finally call for a lunch break. The director was apparently reluctant to waste any footage and so we have a movie that feels as cobbled-together as Dr. Frankenstein's creation.
My advice is simply to remember that it's late at night and there's probably nothing else on. So relax, enjoy the abundant nudity, and don't search for deeper meanings. There aren't any.
ouch my sore penis
nobby_goat18 May 2012
It's been on Sci Fi channel (Sky) recently.
It's gone a lot further than anything else on Sky recently - open leg & clear back shots.
What's not to like?
Oh I have to fill 10 lines.... well there's at least one scene taken out of another film, I enjoyed a pizza while I was watching it, it wasn't Ingloreous Basteurds (which I watched tonight and was terrible). Err... Come on Blackpool!
Oh god, losing the will to live - look it's a standard soft core film with a little sneaky peek at a few flaps now and then. That's it!
It's gone a lot further than anything else on Sky recently - open leg & clear back shots.
What's not to like?
Oh I have to fill 10 lines.... well there's at least one scene taken out of another film, I enjoyed a pizza while I was watching it, it wasn't Ingloreous Basteurds (which I watched tonight and was terrible). Err... Come on Blackpool!
Oh god, losing the will to live - look it's a standard soft core film with a little sneaky peek at a few flaps now and then. That's it!
A TRUE CLASSIC - swelling music and breathtaking performances from every hair piece
Fawny15 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
An odyssey to remember. I simply cannot remember the last time I was so moved. To start with we are presented with the beautiful Lolita, (soon to be) scantily clad space censorship warden, and the perfect hostess to our magical journey through time, space, and beyond.
Lolita shows us an astoundingly erotic range of clips, with a titantic amount of god-gifted breasts and sculpted arses.
Our first tale takes us into the realms of art. Sherri, a stunning brunette with obvious psychological troubles allows us to probe deep into her psyche, as we discover her long hidden secret. Initially sparked by the traumatic sighting of horrendously fake boobs at her art class, Sherri steadily begins to remember her sordid past. The symbolism of a ring being taken was moving and maturely modernistic in its application to this genre, creating a stunning segment of erotic cinema. I was really turned on. I especially enjoyed the cameo appearance of Sasha, the Italian with questionable trauma-coping reflexes.
Lolita's second tale was set in the darkly moody space prison, reminiscent of the best of film noir of this cinematic period. Emblazoned in PVC, the dominating prison guard gave an excellent performance, overshadowed perhaps only by the inmates' hair, which gave breathtaking personality to their roles. Credibility was further added to the various races through the sparing use of makeup to give an overall natural look to the impoverished inmates.
Our final tale was set in the diner with a difference. What a plot twist! Unburdoned by the strings of time, the diner was host to a plethora of erotic encounters, spanning entire eras, from Neolithic to the future, where leather-tassled mattress wrestling is an everyday sport. This insightful view into what is to come gave added realism to the overall project, and truly made the film a classic.
Compounded throughout by an astonishing use of atmospheric and swelling music of breathtaking variety, Lolita 2000 can truly be revered as the film of our generation. In times to come, undoubtedly it will be held up among such greats as Casablanca, Ben Hur, and Psycho, as a film that truly reflected the zeitgeist of the time.
A must see!!
Lolita shows us an astoundingly erotic range of clips, with a titantic amount of god-gifted breasts and sculpted arses.
Our first tale takes us into the realms of art. Sherri, a stunning brunette with obvious psychological troubles allows us to probe deep into her psyche, as we discover her long hidden secret. Initially sparked by the traumatic sighting of horrendously fake boobs at her art class, Sherri steadily begins to remember her sordid past. The symbolism of a ring being taken was moving and maturely modernistic in its application to this genre, creating a stunning segment of erotic cinema. I was really turned on. I especially enjoyed the cameo appearance of Sasha, the Italian with questionable trauma-coping reflexes.
Lolita's second tale was set in the darkly moody space prison, reminiscent of the best of film noir of this cinematic period. Emblazoned in PVC, the dominating prison guard gave an excellent performance, overshadowed perhaps only by the inmates' hair, which gave breathtaking personality to their roles. Credibility was further added to the various races through the sparing use of makeup to give an overall natural look to the impoverished inmates.
Our final tale was set in the diner with a difference. What a plot twist! Unburdoned by the strings of time, the diner was host to a plethora of erotic encounters, spanning entire eras, from Neolithic to the future, where leather-tassled mattress wrestling is an everyday sport. This insightful view into what is to come gave added realism to the overall project, and truly made the film a classic.
Compounded throughout by an astonishing use of atmospheric and swelling music of breathtaking variety, Lolita 2000 can truly be revered as the film of our generation. In times to come, undoubtedly it will be held up among such greats as Casablanca, Ben Hur, and Psycho, as a film that truly reflected the zeitgeist of the time.
A must see!!
Lolita needs to get better stories
Dr. Gore5 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
I bought this DVD. I saw that Nikki Nova was in it and had to check it out. Lolita, (Jacqueline Lovell), is some sort of outer space storyteller. She wants to spin tales of lust and sex for our viewing pleasure. The "System" she used to work for tried to cool her down but Lolita wants to heat things up. She has blasted off in her love rocket to show us three stories. "Are you in control of your mind?"
Well, I was disappointed. Everything that is wrong about softcore porno is evident in "Lolita 2000". The women are all hot and the sex scenes have that glossy shine to it. So you see the problem don't you? Lots of half hearted sex scenes don't make for a hot skin flick.
Take the Nikki Nova scene. Nikki is in an intergalactic prison for the criminally horny. She's sharing a cell with some hot blonde. Naturally, they want to express their love for each other. This scene should have blown my mind but instead left me unsatisfied. Nikki and friend just kind of dance around each other while rubbing and touching. This is what I'm talking about. This is the "Lolita 2000" version of a sex scene. All they needed was to have the babes get naked. It doesn't matter if the ladies are actually trying to have sex, being naked is enough. Well, not for me Lolita!
Speaking of Lolita, why doesn't she have a sex scene? She babbles on and on about the power of the stories but doesn't seem to get too hot and bothered about them. OK, so she fools around with one chick for about 30 seconds. You call that a sex scene? Come on Lolita. Practice what you preach.
I bought this DVD. I saw that Nikki Nova was in it and had to check it out. Lolita, (Jacqueline Lovell), is some sort of outer space storyteller. She wants to spin tales of lust and sex for our viewing pleasure. The "System" she used to work for tried to cool her down but Lolita wants to heat things up. She has blasted off in her love rocket to show us three stories. "Are you in control of your mind?"
Well, I was disappointed. Everything that is wrong about softcore porno is evident in "Lolita 2000". The women are all hot and the sex scenes have that glossy shine to it. So you see the problem don't you? Lots of half hearted sex scenes don't make for a hot skin flick.
Take the Nikki Nova scene. Nikki is in an intergalactic prison for the criminally horny. She's sharing a cell with some hot blonde. Naturally, they want to express their love for each other. This scene should have blown my mind but instead left me unsatisfied. Nikki and friend just kind of dance around each other while rubbing and touching. This is what I'm talking about. This is the "Lolita 2000" version of a sex scene. All they needed was to have the babes get naked. It doesn't matter if the ladies are actually trying to have sex, being naked is enough. Well, not for me Lolita!
Speaking of Lolita, why doesn't she have a sex scene? She babbles on and on about the power of the stories but doesn't seem to get too hot and bothered about them. OK, so she fools around with one chick for about 30 seconds. You call that a sex scene? Come on Lolita. Practice what you preach.
It was OK...
Mangler12 January 1999
...if you don't mind the obvious faking, but then maybe I'm expecting too much from this category of flicks - those that ride the line between R and X. An effort to make the faking more debatable to the eagle-eyes would be nice.
There were a few NICE scenes in Exotic House of Wax - perhaps if Surrender Cinema made more like it...
There were a few NICE scenes in Exotic House of Wax - perhaps if Surrender Cinema made more like it...
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
