52
Metascore
11 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 75Chicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertChicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertWhat makes Critters more than a ripoff are its humor and its sense of style. This is a movie made by people who must have had fun making it.
- 75Chicago TribuneRick KoganChicago TribuneRick KoganFor its many lighter moments, Critters is careful to balance its laughs with a number of chills. It unabashedly and wittily pays homage to other films. But ultimately it stands firmly on its own, a little bit frightening and a lot of fun. [15 Apr 1986, p.3C]
- 60EmpireKim NewmanEmpireKim NewmanDerivative but tongue-in-cheek enough to have a following.
- 60Time OutTime OutJudging from the title, Spielberg's Gremlins would be the immediate target, and indeed Critters does share a sardonic similarity. In fact, Critters looks like several dozen films without looking like any one of them, the action and characters lifted whole from a dissimilar plethora of cinematic sources and underscored with a sizzling sarcasm which elevates it from its source material.
- 50Slant MagazineEric HendersonSlant MagazineEric HendersonSlap together a modestly budgeted horror film with an unmistakable resemblance to a recent hit film (Gremlins) and a notable inversion of another popular film’s ending (Poltergeist), insert just enough Podunk camp to ensure Joe Bob Briggs would catch its scent and you’ll guarantee yourself the birth of a franchise.
- 50TV Guide MagazineTV Guide MagazineOne of the most enjoyable films of the summer, Critters harks back to the low-budget science fiction films of the 1950s and balances the thrills with heavy doses of humor.
- 50The Globe and Mail (Toronto)The Globe and Mail (Toronto)Critters mounts a moment or two of suspense, but director Herek has as much wit and even less visual imagination than the people who created Night of the Comet. [16 Apr 1986, p.C6]
- 50Los Angeles TimesMichael WilmingtonLos Angeles TimesMichael WilmingtonCritters is a dumb, but sometimes likable little movie: maybe an odd comment, since it contains savage killings, mutilations and general bloodshed and evisceration. [25 Apr 1986, p.8]
- 40The New York TimesCaryn JamesThe New York TimesCaryn JamesIt's commercially calculated to have something for everyone - suspense, humor, even a bounty hunter from the krites' planet who poses as a rock star. Unfortunately, the film doesn't have the humor or the budget to match any of these goals.