The Possessed (TV Movie 1977) Poster

(1977 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Adequate Though Pedestrian 1970s TV-Movie
mrb198017 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Possession-type movies were quite popular in the 1970s thanks to "The Exorcist". In this TV-movie, clothing, papers, and people are bursting into flames at a girls' boarding school, so it's ex-priest Kevin Leahy (James Farentino) to the rescue. He tangles with the school's administrators, including the evil Louise Gelson (Joan Hackett). Although not unexpected, the nail-spitting/vomit/immolation sequence is quite a bravura finale. The movie's conclusion is a little muddled, apparently purposely so. Fine actresses Ann Dusenberry and Claudette Nevins also star.

First broadcast in May 1977, this film also starred fourth-billed Harrison Ford, in his final role before becoming a worldwide superstar thanks to his appearance in "Star Wars" a few weeks later. He plays a handsome biology teacher who unfortunately finds himself locked in a room and on fire. Ford's brief appearance is a little disappointing, but how could the filmmakers have known he'd be incredibly famous in just a couple of weeks? This TV-movie is an interesting time-filler, but you've seen it all before. Try to catch it for a brief glimpse of young and pre-stardom Harrison Ford.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sadly Just an Exorcist Wanna-Be
ryan-1007521 October 2018
James Farentino plays boozy Father Kevin Leahy. He dies during a car crash, but is given his life back to fight evil. All of this is shown before the credits even roll. Farentino is quite good in this somewhat intense role and carries the film. At the Helen Page All-Girls School unexplained fires start happening, so Leahy is brought in to investigate.

I think the biggest problem I had with this 1977 TV Movie originally shown on NBC was what it wanted to be. It obviously was inspired by William Friedkin's THE EXORCIST, but half the time it just plays itself out like a cheap knock-off. Also becomes dialogue heavy and by the end of the movie the possession angle is pretty hokey. Which is too bad, because I did enjoy Farentino's performance.

Also starring Diana Scarwid, Dinah Manoff, P.J. Soles (as students at the all-girls school) and a pre-STAR WARS Harrison Ford who plays a nutty, creepy teacher Paul Winjam. Was very interesting seeing an early film role for Ford, but at the same time it wasn't exactly a very memorable role.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Could have been a series
BandSAboutMovies7 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Originally airing on May 7, 1977, The Possessed is the kind of movie where you say, "This would be a good series." That's because it's a back door pilot for a show that never happened. I really wish that it would have.

Kevin Leahy (James Farentino) is a Catholic priest who has fallen from his faith. He drunkenly smashes his car and dies, but God sends him back to our world to stop evil.

That divine mission brings him to the Helen Page School, where Ellen Sumner (Claudette Nevins, All the Marbles, Tuff Turf) is having issues dealing with her daughter Weezie (Ann Dusenberry, Jaws 2) and sister Louise, but soon has an even bigger problem - people and objects like her typewriter are suddenly bursting into flames.

The other schoolgirls play a prank on Weezie and are reprimanded, but soon, the curtains in Weezie's room are on fire. Oh these bad girls! There's Lane (Diana Scarwid, Christina from Mommie Dearest!), Alex, Celia (Dinah Manoff, daughter of Lee Grant and the first person to be killed by Chuckie in Child's Play and also Richard Mulligan's daughter on Empty Nest) and Marty (P.J. Soles!). Lane is the next to go up in flames at graduation practice, which brings Sergeant Taplinger around, investigating everyone.

There are plenty of subjects and people misbehaving, like Paul Winjam (Harrison Ford!), a teacher who has been romantically involved with Louise and now Weezie. And soon, Paul Leahy comes to help, but Paul soon dies when he catches on fire.

Soon, Louise has gone full Regan, spitting fluids and nails at our priest hero. He puts out her fire, saves her and disappears into a burning pool, one assumes to continue onto another occult adventure that will never happen.

The Possessed is pretty decent, taking it's time to set up who the killer is and having a hero who really comes off as cold and cynical. It's worth watching, even if it's to spot the actor and see plenty of your favorites in early roles.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Whoa....the vivid memories!
muzik_guy12 January 2003
Along with Gargoyles, Trilogy of Terror & Don't Be Afraid of the Dark, this movie scared the crap out of me when I was a kid. The premise, though somewhat formulaic, is still quite effective in this flick. The possession scenes are great, with a particular "hell yea!" during the nail spitting sequence! THAT freaked me out. Poor Harrison Ford hides from this film like it's leprosy or something. I dunno why...it beats "The Devil's Own" ANY day!!!

J Richter
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very weak writing and direction sap the fun from a mild tale of supernatural horror
I_Ailurophile13 September 2023
In 2023 the kitschy opening scene comes off more like the origin of a supervillain rather than of the hero the man is obviously supposed to be. Kindly setting that aside, this made-for-TV horror movie progresses with much the same tenor as most of its kin, with a lot of conversation, straightforward dramatic airs, and investigation flavored with only touches of abnormal goings-on for much of the length. Those abnormalities do escalate, in fairness, and there's a nice twist to come when we're about three-quarters of an hour through. Then again, is it actually a twist if the script strangely doesn't do anything with it? I don't think it's so simple as to say that 'The possessed' is just altogether bad; I see what it did well, and there are worse ways to spend one's time. There's also a great deal that it does poorly, however, and sadly I just don't think it's very good.

Past that revelation with which the script does nothing, we climb into the home stretch of these seventy-six minutes and have to wonder if the chief abnormality of the whole production hasn't actually been the writing all along. Substantial portions of the dialogue and scene writing are pretty much just senseless; elsewhere they're vague, or scattered; at other times a moment comes across as overly direct. All this applies equally to the direction, and the actors can only try to make the most of it all with their best earnest effort. The acting comes off better at some points more than others, yet unfortunately I don't think there's any point weaker than the climax. Joan Hackett seems to be having fun, at least, but my reaction swiftly went from "hey, she's really leaning into it" to laughing at how over the top it was. That climax is also written and shot so sloppily that it's almost incohesive, and the resolution thereof - while marked by a neat effect - feels so much like John Sacret Young just shoving his typewriter off the desk and exclaiming "done" without actually finding a real solution.

In that climax, by the way, we also see how while the makeup artists did fine work, they were apparently instructed to piggyback off of 'The exorcist.' This dovetails neatly into how Leonard Rosenman's score hovers between conventional TV thriller music, and borrowing from Jerry Goldsmith's timeless compositions for 'The omen.' I do actually like the effects here, and I think there was strong potential in the concept, and in some of the story threads. However, though Leahy seems to be posited as a figure of momentous import, the script does nothing meaningful with him. The reveal of the antagonist comes from out of nowhere; the moments preceding the climactic showdown portend something bigger and more wicked afoot, but the screenplay just can't be bothered to explore any such possibilities. 'The possessed' is a picture that relies on the big beats of the narrative to carry the day, trusting that it will be enough, but the writing is ultimately so simplistic in that regard, and otherwise extremely variable in its quality, that the whole can never capture a spark of vitality.

To each their own. Other folks will watch this and just think it's a good time. I want to like it more than I do, honestly, in recognition of the hard work that went into it. Yet the issue is that the value it can claim is outweighed far too much by its faults and shortcomings, and what entertainment the feature can offer is saddled with observation of one foible after another. Yes, there are worse ways to spend your time, but with so many other things to enjoy instead, there's little reason to direct our attention here. 'The possessed' isn't outright awful, but in the very least it needed much more careful, thoughtful, and focused writing and direction to succeed, and the finished film as we see it is all too lacking.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Harrison was not only Star Wars (web)
leplatypus13 April 2020
The legend could be Star Wars made Harrison. Well, Harrison's acting talent existed before the trilogy and this movie, as well as American Graffiti, are here to prove that.

Harrison plays a Don Juanesque teacher in a catholic girl school in which happens demoniac phenomena. He has already his cool attitude and that's why i like him.

Sure the story is a rip-off of the famous exorcist (only a non conformist priest can help them!) but the production is not that bad, especially when you compare it to today productions. Here the effects are authentic, the photography luminous and clear and the story has a direct plot and not a melting-polt of opinions or a collage of bloody, shocking scenes.

So the 70s was the best period from this frightening genre and even a poor production from this time excels from the today stinkers!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What... was that?
mark.waltz9 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Probably the most bizarre and nonsensical supernatural TV horror movie of the '70s, a genre of which I enjoy. "Satan's School for Girls", "The Devil's Daughter", "Death at Love House", all TV movies that are cult favorites of mine. But this one is senseless garbage, almost as bad as "Look What Happened to Rosemary's Baby". But after watching this one intently for 76 minutes, I couldn't see a point, and I certainly never had any chills. There's definitely something evil going on at this girl's school, and it's more than just Diana Scarwid's blue graduation gown catching on fire out of nowhere.

As the headmistress of the school, Joan Hackett gives a very intense performance, seemingly becoming possessed by something and acting very strange which leads to a final moment with James Tarantino that made me wonder if a pivotal scene had been cut out for some reason. Harrison Ford has a small role in this, and he easily could have been edited out as well because his character says no purpose to the story. Claudette Nevins, Eugene Roche and Ann Dusenberry also appear in this film that has an obvious cult following, but I am not a member of that cult. You're supposed to have chills in the climactic moment where everything comes together. All I did was laugh at it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining, for fans of 1970s made-for-tv horror
ebeckstr-17 October 2018
While by no means on par with such a great made-for-tv horror films from the 70s, such as The Night Stalker and Don't Be Afraid of the Dark, not to mention the early 80s classic Dark Night of the Scarecrow, The Possessed is chock-full of fantastic acting. Those playing the high school girls, right on up through more experienced actors like James Farentino, a young Harrison Ford, and the wonderful character actor, Eugene Roche, all take their roles seriously, and turn what could have easily been a ho-hum affair into something far more entertaining. As silly as the plot is on the face of it, if one suspends disbelief, there is also some above-average dialogue.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
James Farentino, RIP
lee_eisenberg25 June 2012
"The Possessed" is better than you might expect, mainly due to the absence of gore and shocks (since this is a TV movie, they didn't even get to show any nudity). The recently deceased James Farentino plays a priest investigating strange occurrences in a girls' school in Salem, Oregon. One of the most famous things about the movie nowadays is that it was probably Harrison Ford's final role before he became known as Han Solo. But like I said, the emphasis on suspense rather than gore and special effects strengthens the movie. The last ten minutes turn out to be the really creepy part of the movie. It's definitely worth seeing if you get a chance. Also starring Joan Hackett, P.J. Soles (Norma in "Carrie") and Diana Scarwid (Christina in "Mommie Dearest").
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hokum redeemed by a terrific performance...
nospin28 April 1999
This late out of the blocks made-for-t.v. rip-off of "The Exorcist" is unlucky enough to 'star' James Farentino, busy nursing his two expressions until the next mini-series comes along. What redeems this film though are a strong performance by a young Harrison Ford and a simply terrific one by Joan Hackett.Her character oozes madness, repressed sexuality and fierce intelligence, displayed with a clarity reminiscent of Anthony Perkins work in "Psycho". Rarely has insanity been so chillingly portrayed as here, despite the limitations of the format.
25 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A little flawed, but acceptable
slayrrr6667 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"The Possessed" isn't that bad but does have some problems.

**SPOILERS**

After narrowly avoiding death, Minister Kevin Leahy, (James Farentino) is assigned to fight evil in all it's forms. The students at the Helen Page Girls School, all ready to graduate in a short manner of time, soon start experiencing weird phenomena, as all sorts of objects on campus start bursting into flame for no reason. After meeting Leahy, Ellen Sumner, (Claudette Nevins) a teacher at the school decides to take over the investigation. Questioning staff members Mrs. Louise Gelson, (Joan Hackett) and Paul Winjam, (Harrison Ford) for possible explanations, he comes up empty but the strange events continue. Finally discovering that a source of evil rather than student Weezie, (Ann Dusenberry) that is causing the fires, the remaining students race to stop it from spreading through the school while he deals with his own demons from the past.

The Good News: This one wasn't that bad and had some great moments. The film's at it's best when it goes for the shock moments, and these are mainly the sudden fire-spouts. They come out of nowhere and show no consistency, neither in source or intensity. From having a paper catch fire inside a typewriter, which itself is a marvelously spooky concept, to having a dorm room, then a pant's leg and soon afterward, human targets themselves, spontaneously combust out of nowhere and really manage to get some effective shocks out them. The first human target is the biggest example, as the site of the person going up in flames and the placement of where we see it starting from is a great idea and really one of the better ideas yet. The finale is one of it's highlights, as the culmination of a possessed victim and the need for an exorcism come into play, which is quite new and comes out of nowhere, allow it really let fly with the horror conventions, including the hurling of numerous foreign objects that aren't really seen before, giving them a real sense of this trying new things. The objects used during the possession are regular items expected during this kind of scene, and they make it all the more memorable. Combine that with one of the most extensive fire stunts possible and it just becomes all the more creative. It's a really unique vision and comes across spectacularly. The film's other big improvement is that it successfully manages to throw the red herring into the mix as for what the explanation is. While there's tons of speculation offered and some evidence, it's never accepted as a reason and never really brought up, though this is done in a great way. It's hinted at and offered evidence for, but isn't in any way conclusive and really does seem possible. That's a great compliment and works well for the film.

The Bad News: There's a few problems with this one. One of the biggest ones is that this one here has no real explanation for what's going on. Nothing is uttered about why the events are going on at the school, and this is even pointed out by the characters themselves. For all the time spent investigating and looking for clues, this one doesn't even put one explanation out there as a possible reason. That there's not even a possible one offered is a little confusing, since this could've been all the creepier had something been offered for what was causing it. Another really big flaw is the constant scenes of investigation or of the girls in their dorm doing nothing. These simply stretch the film out far longer than it should be and makes them seem like padding. While it's necessary for the introduction to take place, putting it into the middle of the film just makes it seem a little unnecessary and way too much like time was being taken up, not a great move for a film. The last big problem stems from it's feel, as there's an obvious touch to make this a real omnipresent danger around the film, yet it just comes across as a series of isolated incidents without much behind them. It's a great idea, but there's a sense that it's building to a huge payoff and the one received is acceptable, but not as grand as it was building to. This is what hurts the film the most.

The Final Verdict: While there's some good stuff here, there's some nagging problems that do hold this one back. Give it a try if it's something potentially interesting, but those expecting a big supernatural thriller like the time-period will be disappointed.

Rated UN/R: Violence and some Language
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Like a pilot for THE EXORCIST: THE SERIES
udar5521 October 2011
Lost-his-faith priest Kevin Leahy (James Farentino) dies in a car accident. He is admonished by God for having lost his faith and returned to Earth on a mission to seek out evil. He quickly finds it at an all girls school run by siblings Ellen (Claudette Nevins) and Louise (Joan Hackett). Fires have been starting with seemingly no source and it appears to actually be targeting the girls. This TV movie plays like a pilot for THE EXORCIST: THE SERIES, but WB Television never went any further with it. Farentino is good in the lead role and you'll notice some familiar faces among the students including P.J. Soles, Dinah Manoff, and Ann Dusenberry. Perhaps the biggest draw for folks is a pre-STAR WARS Harrison Ford as the girls' biology teacher. The fire bits are pretty spooky, as is the performance of the possessed person (I won't spoil it) during the last ten minutes. The end gets down to the EXORCIST-lite moments, including the possessed person puking up nails (!) on the priest.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A movie I'll never forget... Warning: Spoilers
Wow. I've been searching for this movie for decades, now. I tried searching all the keywords and possible titles, and was not able to find it until I asked for help on the IMDb community boards, and I'm so glad to have found it again!

I will never forget the way she looked at the end... her skin, and eyes, and the way her lips were so severely chapped and raw... and then she spews nails at the guy, and he grabs her and falls or jumps into the pool and they are enveloped and consumed by the erupting fire! I was definitely freaked out. This movie made such a huge impact on me, I don't think I'll ever forget it... Not that scene anyway!!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thank you IMDb
jonduckworth25 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Thank you IMDb. I remember seeing this as a kid back in the 1980s when my dad taped it after a late night BBC screening. For years that nail spewing scene has lived with me. Recently, I found myself thinking "Why have I never seen that film where a woman vomits nails again? Surely it's a horror classic." That bit scared the hell out of me when I was a kid, even though I remembered next to nothing else about it. Google searches along the lines of "puke" "nails" "school" came up with nothing. No one else seems to remember it. And then, thanks to IMDb, I find that I hadn't just imagined it! It exists. Glad that other people shared the experience of seeing this as a kid. I'd love to watch it again, although I understand it may not be as good as I remember it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Genuinely scareee but also thought provoking.
cmcastl18 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I find nothing less scary than modern vampire movies or slasher films. I do not waste my time with them. We can't have for my taste enough horror films which are Omen-esque. Or, as suggested in the reviews here, along the lines of the Exorcist. That is, horror films which have at their core a metaphysical struggle between Good and Evil, which is what the drama plays out. I agree with most of the previous reviewers on most of their points. The one point on which I would venture to disagree and which has prompted me to add this contribution is that the very reason that the evil is unexplained is what I find philosophically fascinating about this film.

Farentino plays a priest who has lost his faith or is on his way to losing it. Is he a lost soul literally returned from the dead to redeem himself in some way? His backstory is pleasingly kept unclear. I agree with how creepy the finale is with Joan Hackett's character literally spitting nails. But the creepiest moment in the film for me, and what lingers in my memory, is when Farentino's priest is asked why this evil is happening? He responds there is no reason why to Evil. Evil just is. Evil just happens. Whether or not I agree with it, and I am not saying I do, as a premise that for me is one of the most genuinely chilling moments and revelations not just in this but in all the supernatural films I have seen.

Psychological/philosophical horror is the scariest horror of all. This film is a minor gem of supernatural horror for the discerning.

Pity it was a pilot never picked up.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A small screen version of The Exorcist
GOWBTW24 January 2019
Made for TV movies are fun. "The Possessed" is like a small screen version of "The Exorcist". Only easier to see. A priest(James Farentino) who was involved in a car accident gets a second chance at life following his ordeal with alcohol and disbelief. He would go to this all-girls school which next year would be coed. Bad things happen in the school. Things were catching on fire, the graduating class get a little scare when the valedictorian gets mysteriously burned during practice. And most of all, the biology teacher(Harrison Ford) gets engulfed by the flames after he saved the student, earlier. The priest takes action against the evil that terrorized the school. Despite being a TV movie, it does have a great cast. Eventhough Ford's role was small. It was made by Warner Bros. Still good to enjoy. 2 out of 5 stars
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nail Nails, Nails...
pshepherd-8592623 June 2022
The nail spitting! I'm now 56 and remember it vividly even though I saw it in about 1980 on late night (British) TV - scared the hell out of me! I can't remember much else about the movie but the fact the brilliant Joan Hackett is in it does it for me, it must be pretty good. I'd love to see it again.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Mild-mannered, atmospheric riff on possession horror
drownsoda9014 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"The Possessed" has a priest sent on a mission to destroy evil arriving at an all girls' college where a series of inexplicable fires are occurring, some of which have injured the students. As time rolls on, it becomes clear that everything at the school is not as copacetic as it seems.

What is it about '70s television horror films that is so endearing? I really don't know. I didn't even grow up in the era, but I still find a certain sort of charm and unique attention to detail in them that theatrical films of the era didn't always offer, and "The Possessed" is another example to be added to this list.

Often viewed as a TV riff on "The Exorcist," "The Possessed" is actually incredibly different, specifically in its explicitness, as well as its treatment of evil. As Father Leahy tells one of the female students in the film, sometimes evil just appears without any rhyme or reason, and to think that our actions are what bring it about is not only inaccurate, but foolish.

It is this approach that the film takes which is certainly unusual— the very nature of the evil forces in question are incredibly vague, and remain so. These forces are visually represented (or rather, manifested) through the random fires that are occurring on the school campus, and the treatment of these scenes is surprisingly unnerving and bizarre. There are also some unusual meditations on student-teacher relationships and the sexualized politics of academia that sometimes take center stage as the film's central drama— however, they may or may not be inconsequential to the supernatural events occurring at the school.

The film was shot at Reed College in Portland, Oregon— an area I grew up near— and there is a hazy, foggy look to the entire film that is effective and establishes an appropriate level of gloom. The film's conclusion is a bit brisk (perhaps too brisk), but for a television film from the '70s, is entirely forgivable.

Overall, a noble and understated effort that captures the charm of '70s television films while reaching considerable heights on the creep-o-meter. Also worth checking out for its top-notch cast— Joan Hackett, Claudette Nevins, and James Farentino head the cast. Also some great early performances from P.J. Soles (who filmed "Halloween" the following year), Diana Scarwid, and Harrison Ford, who, three weeks after "The Possessed"'s air date, would only forever be known as Han Solo. 8/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Above Average Horror Film
Michael_Elliott28 August 2015
The Possessed (1977)

*** (out of 4)

Father Kevin Leahy (James Farentino) is in an automobile accident when he is pronounced dead on the scene. In the limbo he hears a voice telling him to return to life and seek out the Evil in the world. Soon afterwards he ends up at a girl's boarding school in Salen, Oregon where mysterious fires have been breaking out. The head mistress (Joan Hackett), her sister (Claudette Nevins) and her younger daughter (Ann Dusenberry) all seem to have some sort of connection.

THE POSSESSED is without question one of the better made-for-television horror movies ever made. It's kind of funny that Warner now handles the release of the picture since it was released the same year as their disastrous EXORCIST II. There's no question that this movie was probably inspired by THE EXORCIST but everything wrong with that film's sequel is certainly improved on here. There's no doubt that I went into the movie not sure what to expect but I walked away with an extremely good film that manages to feature great performances and a pretty good story.

The performances are certainly a major plus because there's quite a bit of character development here. Farentino is wonderful as the Father who finds himself trying to figure out exactly why he was brought back to life and who is behind these Satanic fires. Nevins is also excellent in her role as the mother and Dusenberry is also good. The supporting cast includes Dinah Manoff, P.J. Soles and Diana Scarwid. The biggest name is Harrison Ford who is excellent in a small role as a professor. The film also benefits from some nice cinematography and an extremely effective music score.

Another thing that really works for the movie is its pacing by director Jerry Thorpe. He certainly knows how to keep the film moving and manages to make the story quite interesting and makes it hold your attention even without the big-budget special effects. The ending itself is quite good, although there's no question that they were going for the same feel as THE EXORCIST. THE POSSESSED isn't a masterpiece but it's about as good as a film like this can get.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Something's Burning!"...
azathothpwiggins21 August 2018
In THE POSSESSED, Father Kevin Leahy (James Farentino) is killed in a car crash, only to be judged to have fallen from grace. Returned to life, he must seek out and fight eeevil.

Meanwhile, at the Helen Page private girl's school, in addition to the usual end of the year hijinks, strange things begin happening. Spontaneous, near-fatal fires break out.

Friends Weezie and Lane (Ann Dusenberry and Diana Scarwid) have only three weeks to go before graduation. Lane's mother, Ellen (Claudette Nevins) has taught at the school for years. Burned in one of the fires herself, Ellen fears that dark forces are at work. Willing to try anything, Ellen is referred to Leahy. Can he discover the source of the problem, before someone else is hurt or even killed?

As made-for-TV horror films go, this is one of the better ones dealing with the paranormal / supernatural. The story is interesting, using fire as a metaphor for jealous rage, which is what seems to have allowed the demonic presence to flourish. The characters are strong and the pool-side finale is magnificent! Farentino is quite believable in his rather dour role.

Co-stars Joan Hackett as headmistress, Louise Gelson, and Harrison Ford as biology teacher, Paul Winjam. Ford has one of the best, grimmest scenes in the movie! Watch for P.J. Soles in a tiny role...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed