19 reviews
Lighten up folks!
I just read all of the other reviews to verify my premise, which turned out to be true. They all take the position that this movie is pretty awful on many levels. Well, sure it is since it is obviously a spoof and a send-up. Taking it seriously is a preposterous mistake of judgment. For whatever reason the director chose to go beyond all the limits and that is what gives him away. Maybe just to have fun, maybe to get even with the studio for some transgression, could have been anything. Like it or hate it as you choose but take a chill pill and recognize that your leg has been properly pulled!
Not bad for a Poverty Row potboiler
Here's a film from the early sound era. This one, I'm pretty sure, was from good old Poverty Row, purveyors of wads of borderline unwatchable dreck from the olden days. This one was a little bit better than most of these cheapo programme filler efforts, as it has just enough interest to get it over the line but don't get me wrong, this is ropey stuff in many respects. It tells the tale of a prison break, where a convict escapes (in an impressively dangerous looking bit of stunt work involving being lifted on a bit of rope attached to a plane, from a speeding train), soon after this a mysterious villain called The Phantom begins a terror campaign. To a large extent, this is one of those tried and tested old dark house movies, which were a staple of many a low budget pot-boiler in the 30's. To this end, we have a large cast of characters in a big house, with secret passages, a cloaked villain and a cowardly maid (and chaffuer) - i.e. Aside from having a man in a gorilla suit, this features typical nonsense which many of these films have. But there's enough oddball extras to keep this interesting enough, like the creepy bellhop, with the bizarre accent. Its really not bad, as these types of old school Poverty Row efforts go.
- Red-Barracuda
- Nov 28, 2021
- Permalink
for a poverty row production there is a German Expressionism influence
Early talky that is still quite fun.
It starts with a prison break with a man about to be electrocuted jumping over the wall onto a moving train and then being picked up by a plane dangling a rope ladder! And that is just the first 5 minutes! Most of this is an "old dark house" style thriller about a mad killer called The Phantom who is out to kill a local district attorney (former D.W. Griffith regular Wilfred Lucas). The D.A.'s daughter (Allene Ray) and her reporter boyfriend (Guinn WIlliams) team up to catch the cloaked maniac and, in the tradition of movies like this, do a much better job than the cops who have surrounded the house. They trail the madman to an insane asylum where nobody, and I mean NOBODY! is playing with a full deck. For a one hour film the plot gets complicated with things like insanity, kidnapping, revenge and even brain transplants. The only thing missing was a gorilla, and if the plot had run another 10 minutes I'll one would have popped up! It all makes sense (well, sort of) at the end when the prison warden shows up to identify the mad killer. (You don't expect ME to reveal who it is, do you?) Also in the cast is The Clutching Hand himself, Sheldon Lewis. In a cap, tall hat and fright wig he is still playing the character he created for the 1916 serial THE EXPLOITS OF ELAINE and doing it rather well. Lweis was also the only actor to ever play Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde twice. Once in 1920 in the version filmed on location in New York to compete against the John Barrymore and again in 1929 in a one reel talkie short. Art? No way. Fun? You bet! See this one.
- reptilicus
- Feb 17, 2002
- Permalink
The phantom lunatic
When a dangerous killer escapes from the local gaol, police suspect he may come after the DA as retribution for his incarceration. Assigned to protect the DA (Lucas), bull-nose detective (O'Brien) settles in for a long night that ends up turning into a fracas when "The Phantom" enters the house via a secret labyrinth of ducts and concealed passages, threatening the DA's daughter (Ray) before disappearing into the night. Fortunately, novice reporter (Williams) has a hunch "The Phantom" might be heading for a local mental sanitarium leading to a terrifying encounter with the residents of the local loony-bin.
There's some mild chuckles and feint thrills in his uneven comedy-thriller, but the acting seems quite stilted at times and the tension seems to be constantly nobbled by ill-timed humour. Williams is the strongest performer as the young, assertive reporter keen to solve the mystery to earn a pay increase that will fund his ensuing matrimonials with the DA's daughter.
I found the jittery housekeeper (Knights) a tad over-bearing, her incessant shrills and dramatics becoming old very quickly, while combined with her vertically challenged boyfriend, the Chauffeur Shorty (Dunn) the pair added a touch of farce to the proceedings that I felt were unnecessary diversions (perhaps padding). Nevertheless, it's coherent and at barely one hour in duration, nothing if not efficient.
There's some mild chuckles and feint thrills in his uneven comedy-thriller, but the acting seems quite stilted at times and the tension seems to be constantly nobbled by ill-timed humour. Williams is the strongest performer as the young, assertive reporter keen to solve the mystery to earn a pay increase that will fund his ensuing matrimonials with the DA's daughter.
I found the jittery housekeeper (Knights) a tad over-bearing, her incessant shrills and dramatics becoming old very quickly, while combined with her vertically challenged boyfriend, the Chauffeur Shorty (Dunn) the pair added a touch of farce to the proceedings that I felt were unnecessary diversions (perhaps padding). Nevertheless, it's coherent and at barely one hour in duration, nothing if not efficient.
- Chase_Witherspoon
- Jun 15, 2012
- Permalink
Solid Premise That Isn't Fully Realized
This is another movie that I had never heard until I was working my way through the horror movie releases from 1931 from Letterboxd. This one intrigued me with the title as it reminded me of the hero serial/film that came out. I did read the synopsis to this one before seeing it as I was trying to find something to pair up. It doesn't make the greatest double feature for my Odyssey through the Ones, but it will work. The synopsis I'm referring to is a group of people are stalked by a masked killer in an old mansion.
We start this movie off in a prison. It appears that a criminal going by the nickname of The Phantom (Sheldon Lewis) is to be executed that day. The warden is talking to a reporter about this and they're alerted a plane is flying low over the building again. We then see The Phantom scales the wall, jumps to a train and the plane picks him up to make his escape.
The Phantom then sends a warning to the district attorney, John Hampton (Wilfred Lucas). He wants to meet him at his house that night to kill him. John agrees and the police are going to send men over. A police sergeant of Pat Collins (Tom O'Brien) is the one assigned here.
John's daughter is also alerted to this. She is a reporter for a local newspaper for the event section. Her name is Ruth (Allen Ray) and she is dating another reporter of Dick Mallory (Guinn 'Big Boy' Williams). Her boss though is in love with her, Sam Crandall (Niles Welch). He expresses how he feels and she tells him she is going to marry Dick. They are just hoping he gets a promotion, which falls on Sam. He has to decide what he will do here.
All of these people converge on John Hampton's home that night. Also included are his maid, Lucy (Violet Knights), who is jumpy and she is seeing the chauffeur, Shorty (Bobby Dunn), who is much in the same vein as her. The Phantom sneaks into the house along with another guy who makes a demand of John without introducing himself. This becomes a wild night to figure out who The Phantom really is and capture him before he kills anyone. Their search will lead him to a local asylum ran by Dr. Weldon (William Gould) and us getting to meet the odd Oscar (William Jackie).
I feel that is enough to flesh out the story this movie and get you up to speed with what type of movie we are going to get. What I will start with is that this is short. It runs just over an hour and doesn't waste any time getting into it, which is good. What I found interesting though was that I thought we were going to get an 'Old Dark House' type film and that is how it starts. We actually get 2 of them including the asylum where we have secret passages and what not which I do enjoy.
With this story here, I do think it is lacking some fleshing out of things. I like the idea of The Phantom, him escaping from prison and wanting to get revenge on the district attorney. It is interesting though is that John wasn't the DA when this case was tried, but The Phantom still blames the office. There is an interesting scene with Dick that we get early on into the night where I thought we were going to have to guess who The Phantom really is. Lewis plays the role quite creepy what I like, but the reveal is just a bit abrupt and not really shocking. It also feels a bit like a cheat as well. The movie really wants more to focus on this love triangle between Dick, Ruth and Sam, but Sam really just has to make one decision whether or not to give Dick the promotion or not. It seems they're on the right path to make a deep story, but didn't go far enough with it.
What I will say is that the acting is fine. I can see why Williams has the nickname of Big Boy as he's a tall guy. It does make it hard for us to believe that he's The Phantom though. Ray is solid as his love interest, but they don't flesh out Ruth all that much. Welch is good as the better option for Ruth despite how she feels about Dick. Sam is a solid guy for sure. Aside from that I think the rest of the cast rounded this out for what was needed. Lewis as I said was creepy as The Phantom, Knights and Dunn bring some levity to the movie which we got a lot of in this era. I really liked Jackie as Oscar as well in his limited role.
Then really aside from that, it just leaves me the cinematography, effects and soundtrack. For the former, it is fine. Being in early cinema, we are getting static shots. What I will give credit to though is the setting. Both houses are interesting with their secret passages and what not. I'm a sucker for that. This isn't really the type of movie that has effects, but I think the look of The Phantom is creepy. Oscar seems to be abnormally tall as well as slender and how he moves his body was interesting. Then really the soundtrack fit for what was needed. It didn't stand out or hurt the movie for me.
This there really isn't a whole lot to delve into this movie that is where I'm going to leave it. I do think that we have some interesting set ups here, but the movie just doesn't go far enough in fleshing them out. I like the idea of this villain escaping from prison and trying to get revenge. The acting is solid enough. The setting and look of The Phantom are also bright spots. Aside from that, the movie is okay just lacking quite a bit for me to really enjoy this one. For that reason I'd say this is an average movie. There are good and bad aspects on both sides for me so I'm coming in the middle here.
We start this movie off in a prison. It appears that a criminal going by the nickname of The Phantom (Sheldon Lewis) is to be executed that day. The warden is talking to a reporter about this and they're alerted a plane is flying low over the building again. We then see The Phantom scales the wall, jumps to a train and the plane picks him up to make his escape.
The Phantom then sends a warning to the district attorney, John Hampton (Wilfred Lucas). He wants to meet him at his house that night to kill him. John agrees and the police are going to send men over. A police sergeant of Pat Collins (Tom O'Brien) is the one assigned here.
John's daughter is also alerted to this. She is a reporter for a local newspaper for the event section. Her name is Ruth (Allen Ray) and she is dating another reporter of Dick Mallory (Guinn 'Big Boy' Williams). Her boss though is in love with her, Sam Crandall (Niles Welch). He expresses how he feels and she tells him she is going to marry Dick. They are just hoping he gets a promotion, which falls on Sam. He has to decide what he will do here.
All of these people converge on John Hampton's home that night. Also included are his maid, Lucy (Violet Knights), who is jumpy and she is seeing the chauffeur, Shorty (Bobby Dunn), who is much in the same vein as her. The Phantom sneaks into the house along with another guy who makes a demand of John without introducing himself. This becomes a wild night to figure out who The Phantom really is and capture him before he kills anyone. Their search will lead him to a local asylum ran by Dr. Weldon (William Gould) and us getting to meet the odd Oscar (William Jackie).
I feel that is enough to flesh out the story this movie and get you up to speed with what type of movie we are going to get. What I will start with is that this is short. It runs just over an hour and doesn't waste any time getting into it, which is good. What I found interesting though was that I thought we were going to get an 'Old Dark House' type film and that is how it starts. We actually get 2 of them including the asylum where we have secret passages and what not which I do enjoy.
With this story here, I do think it is lacking some fleshing out of things. I like the idea of The Phantom, him escaping from prison and wanting to get revenge on the district attorney. It is interesting though is that John wasn't the DA when this case was tried, but The Phantom still blames the office. There is an interesting scene with Dick that we get early on into the night where I thought we were going to have to guess who The Phantom really is. Lewis plays the role quite creepy what I like, but the reveal is just a bit abrupt and not really shocking. It also feels a bit like a cheat as well. The movie really wants more to focus on this love triangle between Dick, Ruth and Sam, but Sam really just has to make one decision whether or not to give Dick the promotion or not. It seems they're on the right path to make a deep story, but didn't go far enough with it.
What I will say is that the acting is fine. I can see why Williams has the nickname of Big Boy as he's a tall guy. It does make it hard for us to believe that he's The Phantom though. Ray is solid as his love interest, but they don't flesh out Ruth all that much. Welch is good as the better option for Ruth despite how she feels about Dick. Sam is a solid guy for sure. Aside from that I think the rest of the cast rounded this out for what was needed. Lewis as I said was creepy as The Phantom, Knights and Dunn bring some levity to the movie which we got a lot of in this era. I really liked Jackie as Oscar as well in his limited role.
Then really aside from that, it just leaves me the cinematography, effects and soundtrack. For the former, it is fine. Being in early cinema, we are getting static shots. What I will give credit to though is the setting. Both houses are interesting with their secret passages and what not. I'm a sucker for that. This isn't really the type of movie that has effects, but I think the look of The Phantom is creepy. Oscar seems to be abnormally tall as well as slender and how he moves his body was interesting. Then really the soundtrack fit for what was needed. It didn't stand out or hurt the movie for me.
This there really isn't a whole lot to delve into this movie that is where I'm going to leave it. I do think that we have some interesting set ups here, but the movie just doesn't go far enough in fleshing them out. I like the idea of this villain escaping from prison and trying to get revenge. The acting is solid enough. The setting and look of The Phantom are also bright spots. Aside from that, the movie is okay just lacking quite a bit for me to really enjoy this one. For that reason I'd say this is an average movie. There are good and bad aspects on both sides for me so I'm coming in the middle here.
- Reviews_of_the_Dead
- May 4, 2021
- Permalink
This Is Not The Phantom You Want To See
- Chance2000esl
- Aug 30, 2008
- Permalink
Sadly, the film is terribly written and the acting is even worse!
- planktonrules
- Jan 2, 2010
- Permalink
A Shadow of "The Bat"
After a thrilling opening, Alan James' movie hunkers down into an "Old Dark House" formula. And, it's an embarrassingly poor version of many earlier trips down the same path. Just last year (1930), filmgoers had "The Bat Whispers" follow "The Bat" and "The Cat Creeps" follow "The Cat and the Canary". These movies must have been very popular at the box office, as they continued to make more
This is a good film to examine for a variety of mostly incongruous acting styles. Allene Ray (as Ruth Hampton) is performing as if she's in a serial (her natural habitat). Tom O'Brien (as Pat Collins) has pure silent film mannerisms (he was one of the John Gilbert's "Big Parade" war buddies). Wilfred Lucas (as John Hampton) looks like an actor waiting for the director (no D.W. Griffith). And, so on
*** The Phantom (11/1/31) Alan James ~ Guinn Williams, Allene Ray, Niles Welch
This is a good film to examine for a variety of mostly incongruous acting styles. Allene Ray (as Ruth Hampton) is performing as if she's in a serial (her natural habitat). Tom O'Brien (as Pat Collins) has pure silent film mannerisms (he was one of the John Gilbert's "Big Parade" war buddies). Wilfred Lucas (as John Hampton) looks like an actor waiting for the director (no D.W. Griffith). And, so on
*** The Phantom (11/1/31) Alan James ~ Guinn Williams, Allene Ray, Niles Welch
- wes-connors
- Jul 12, 2009
- Permalink
Great Spooky Fun
This is the kind of movie you start watching from the cynical forward-looking viewpoint of 2007 and start complaining that the premise is hokey, the set-ups are creaky and the dialog is loaded with clichés.
Then you realize that this film IS SO DANG OLD that it represents probably the first time that some of these set-ups, situations and dialog were ever seen on the movie screen! This dates from only the third year that talking pictures were widely available, so there wasn't much before this that this film could be ripping off, except probably stage plays. From this perspective, there is at least some originality here by definition, and lots of fun to be had with the murderer-on-the-loose-in-the-creepy-insane-asylum premise.
This would make a great double feature with "The Old Dark House," from 1932, creating lots of fodder which would be mocked in the ensuing decades by Bugs Bunny cartoons, Three Stooges shorts, Abbott and Costello films, sketches on "The Carol Burnett Show," "The Rocky Horror Picture Show," and Larry Blamire's "Dark and Stormy Night."
The four-feature DVD from Retromedia is worth the price if you are a fan of obscure, ancient, creaky horror movies like this. You can look up the other features under the individual titles for reviews, but they are all just about as entertaining as this feature. If black-and-white horror films from the dawn of time are not your bag, you should pass, otherwise this DVD is a worthwhile purchase. And these movies are so old that they won't really scare children except for the smallest tots. Pop some popcorn and go back to the 1930's.
Then you realize that this film IS SO DANG OLD that it represents probably the first time that some of these set-ups, situations and dialog were ever seen on the movie screen! This dates from only the third year that talking pictures were widely available, so there wasn't much before this that this film could be ripping off, except probably stage plays. From this perspective, there is at least some originality here by definition, and lots of fun to be had with the murderer-on-the-loose-in-the-creepy-insane-asylum premise.
This would make a great double feature with "The Old Dark House," from 1932, creating lots of fodder which would be mocked in the ensuing decades by Bugs Bunny cartoons, Three Stooges shorts, Abbott and Costello films, sketches on "The Carol Burnett Show," "The Rocky Horror Picture Show," and Larry Blamire's "Dark and Stormy Night."
The four-feature DVD from Retromedia is worth the price if you are a fan of obscure, ancient, creaky horror movies like this. You can look up the other features under the individual titles for reviews, but they are all just about as entertaining as this feature. If black-and-white horror films from the dawn of time are not your bag, you should pass, otherwise this DVD is a worthwhile purchase. And these movies are so old that they won't really scare children except for the smallest tots. Pop some popcorn and go back to the 1930's.
- Scott_Mercer
- Jul 30, 2007
- Permalink
The Phantom Light.
- morrison-dylan-fan
- Oct 3, 2018
- Permalink
An Enjoyable Curiosity Piece with Laughs and Suspense
Creaky Beyond Words
A prisoner named the Phantom is moments away from going to the chair when he climbs over the wall, jumps on top of a passing train and makes a get away when a plane flies down and picks him up. He then threatens the DA, even though he's not the DA who sent him up the river...and then things get complicated.
This is a movie from the early days of sound. Using silent footage with sound effects it broadens what could be done at reasonable expense with the then bulky sound equipment. As a result this film does things that many similar movies from the period couldn't, it goes outside the drawing room, the best example is the jail break at the beginning.
But while it goes places that other films didn't, and it has more twists than a pretzel factory, this film suffers from the same problem that countless other lower budget films did, and that is its limited by sound itself. There is no music and many scenes are staged simply to have people talk, a sequence at the beginning in the newspaper editor's office for example, goes on way too long just so we can hear the characters talking on the phone.
The movie itself is interesting up to a point, but at times it seems to want to get as many of the mystery conventions into the movie as possible so things keep spinning out for no real reason other than to make the film reach a reasonable length. The problem is that as interesting as the plot is, the film's age hinders full enjoyment of it.
If you're in the mood for an antique give it a try, otherwise steer clear.
This is a movie from the early days of sound. Using silent footage with sound effects it broadens what could be done at reasonable expense with the then bulky sound equipment. As a result this film does things that many similar movies from the period couldn't, it goes outside the drawing room, the best example is the jail break at the beginning.
But while it goes places that other films didn't, and it has more twists than a pretzel factory, this film suffers from the same problem that countless other lower budget films did, and that is its limited by sound itself. There is no music and many scenes are staged simply to have people talk, a sequence at the beginning in the newspaper editor's office for example, goes on way too long just so we can hear the characters talking on the phone.
The movie itself is interesting up to a point, but at times it seems to want to get as many of the mystery conventions into the movie as possible so things keep spinning out for no real reason other than to make the film reach a reasonable length. The problem is that as interesting as the plot is, the film's age hinders full enjoyment of it.
If you're in the mood for an antique give it a try, otherwise steer clear.
- dbborroughs
- Apr 23, 2004
- Permalink
I Tried To Watch It - BORING
This movie is NOT a horror-thriller! It's more like a comedy-horror - seriously it is. I was expecting this film to be a fairly decent older horror-thriller but it's just BORING. People in the film giving "comical scared looks" on their faces, maid & chauffeur are a comedy-duo, nothing really happening at all in the film - just fake, comical scared looks and senseless gun shooting inside the manor house hitting nothing - horrible shooters.
If you are looking for a comical styled classic thriller-horror then you might like this film. Otherwise I would pass this one by - much better horror-thriller films to watch from the same year (1931).
I hate to give bad reviews but this movie is NOT what I was expecting it to be. It's hyped as a horror-thriller but it's a comedy-horror-thriller.
2/10
If you are looking for a comical styled classic thriller-horror then you might like this film. Otherwise I would pass this one by - much better horror-thriller films to watch from the same year (1931).
I hate to give bad reviews but this movie is NOT what I was expecting it to be. It's hyped as a horror-thriller but it's a comedy-horror-thriller.
2/10
- Rainey-Dawn
- Apr 18, 2015
- Permalink
This is a fun little film, if you can find it.
For those who enjoy old films and are not put off by poor prints and bad quality sound, this hard to find film is quite fun. Break out the popcorn on a Saturday night in front of the TV. It is spooky and atmospheric, with a number of very funny, intentionally campy moments thrown in, much in line with The Old Dark House. I loved the bit where the reluctant visitor to the spooky old house was being chased around by one of the deranged looking inhabitants with a large stick. When he was finally cornered and was going to give himself up to whatever fate that awaited him, the ungainly old servant just lightly bopped the guy on the head and asked "Hey, did you lose this?" I was quite struck by the connection this film made with me, even though it was made almost 70 years ago.
- greggbartley
- May 23, 2002
- Permalink
A Tough Watch
I really enjoy classic horror, even the poverty row productions. This one, though,was tough to get through.
I agree with others who have said the acting is poor. They're also not well-rehearsed; especially at the beginning the actors are stepping on each others' lines.
I also have a problem with the editing. As the movie starts, it feels like we're cutting between three movies: a prison, the top of a train, and a helicopter. It becomes clear in a few how they connect, but the disjointed editing continues throughout the movie, making for jarring changes between scenes... sometimes lingering too long, sometimes not giving us enough setup or wrap-up.
I knew I was taking a risk when I started it. The description made it sound more like a murder mystery / police drama, and I should have trusted my gut on this one. It's played for laughs almost all the way through which is frustrating, and even when it's not intentional the laughs occasionally come anyway: when the phantom enters a room, it's truly laughable. (Watch carefully as no one makes any attempt to get away.)
You can watch it for free on Archive Dot Org, or on Tubi... but if you're looking for another Dracula or Frankenstein... this ain't it. It doesn't compare well to the. Basil Rathbone / Nigel Bruce mysteries about a decade later, either.
For completists only!
I agree with others who have said the acting is poor. They're also not well-rehearsed; especially at the beginning the actors are stepping on each others' lines.
I also have a problem with the editing. As the movie starts, it feels like we're cutting between three movies: a prison, the top of a train, and a helicopter. It becomes clear in a few how they connect, but the disjointed editing continues throughout the movie, making for jarring changes between scenes... sometimes lingering too long, sometimes not giving us enough setup or wrap-up.
I knew I was taking a risk when I started it. The description made it sound more like a murder mystery / police drama, and I should have trusted my gut on this one. It's played for laughs almost all the way through which is frustrating, and even when it's not intentional the laughs occasionally come anyway: when the phantom enters a room, it's truly laughable. (Watch carefully as no one makes any attempt to get away.)
You can watch it for free on Archive Dot Org, or on Tubi... but if you're looking for another Dracula or Frankenstein... this ain't it. It doesn't compare well to the. Basil Rathbone / Nigel Bruce mysteries about a decade later, either.
For completists only!
- tulsasavage
- Nov 7, 2023
- Permalink
"Old house" mystery and a caped stranger.
- michaelRokeefe
- Jun 4, 2012
- Permalink
A Worthy Watch
I would think that for the people of 1931, this would be quite a movie. The beginning (as many have already stated), was quite exciting - even by today's standards. Then the movie drags a bit.
But my reason for writing this review is only to add that the eclectic cast is worth watching. You can see the obvious influence of the silent era in their expressions and actions/reactions.
But to me, Lucy (played by Violet Knights) almost steals the show. She seems to me a very funny actress. I hope to get to see her in something else some time. However, I suspect this is probably her crowning achievement as an actress, as she made less than ten talking pictures, and was only credited in two of them. I know her acting is overboard, but her expressions and manners are worth the watching of this movie to me. Without her, I would probably give this movie only one or two stars.
The strange Swede (William Jackie?) is also a great comic in this, his only credited role (according to IMDb).
If you like unusual characters, I think this is definitely a movie worth a watch. Don't expect a great story - as others have mentioned, the plot is a bit over-used. But the cast to me is not a disappointment.
But my reason for writing this review is only to add that the eclectic cast is worth watching. You can see the obvious influence of the silent era in their expressions and actions/reactions.
But to me, Lucy (played by Violet Knights) almost steals the show. She seems to me a very funny actress. I hope to get to see her in something else some time. However, I suspect this is probably her crowning achievement as an actress, as she made less than ten talking pictures, and was only credited in two of them. I know her acting is overboard, but her expressions and manners are worth the watching of this movie to me. Without her, I would probably give this movie only one or two stars.
The strange Swede (William Jackie?) is also a great comic in this, his only credited role (according to IMDb).
If you like unusual characters, I think this is definitely a movie worth a watch. Don't expect a great story - as others have mentioned, the plot is a bit over-used. But the cast to me is not a disappointment.
- scott-carter
- Aug 20, 2011
- Permalink
Pretty Bad Genre Pic
Phantom, The (1931)
* (out of 4)
1931 gave us horror classics like Dracula, FRANKENSTEIN and DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE so it's understandable why something like THE PHANTOM has long been forgotten. A man is on his way to death in the electric chair when he jumps over a wall onto a train, which then has a plane come down, pick him up and take him away. He threatens to kill the man who sent him away at the strike of midnight and soon, inside that man's house, the mysterious "Phantom" starts to strike. This entry into the "old dark house" genre is the perfect example of a bad sound film. I'm not sure what the budget of this thing was but it's clear they really couldn't afford to do too much as everything here is quite poor. The screenplay is just a rip of THE BAT and THE CAT AND THE CANARY type of film (both were remade in 1930) and the acting is at times rather atrocious. Allene Ray plays the female "love interest" here and it didn't shock me to read that this turned out to be her final picture. A star of serials in the silent era, her voice and acting certainly didn't go over too well in talkies and I must admit that she might give one of the worst performances I've seen here. Other members of the cast are equally bad and that includes Guinn "Big Boy" Williams. Silent fans might find interest in seeing D.W. Griffith regular Wilfred Lucas and Sheldon Lewis from that "other" version of DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE released in 1920. I've seen a rather large share of films from this genre and this here is without question near the bottom of the barrel. Even if the performances had been better there wouldn't have been any way to get around the bland screenplay and the all around cheapness of the film.
* (out of 4)
1931 gave us horror classics like Dracula, FRANKENSTEIN and DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE so it's understandable why something like THE PHANTOM has long been forgotten. A man is on his way to death in the electric chair when he jumps over a wall onto a train, which then has a plane come down, pick him up and take him away. He threatens to kill the man who sent him away at the strike of midnight and soon, inside that man's house, the mysterious "Phantom" starts to strike. This entry into the "old dark house" genre is the perfect example of a bad sound film. I'm not sure what the budget of this thing was but it's clear they really couldn't afford to do too much as everything here is quite poor. The screenplay is just a rip of THE BAT and THE CAT AND THE CANARY type of film (both were remade in 1930) and the acting is at times rather atrocious. Allene Ray plays the female "love interest" here and it didn't shock me to read that this turned out to be her final picture. A star of serials in the silent era, her voice and acting certainly didn't go over too well in talkies and I must admit that she might give one of the worst performances I've seen here. Other members of the cast are equally bad and that includes Guinn "Big Boy" Williams. Silent fans might find interest in seeing D.W. Griffith regular Wilfred Lucas and Sheldon Lewis from that "other" version of DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE released in 1920. I've seen a rather large share of films from this genre and this here is without question near the bottom of the barrel. Even if the performances had been better there wouldn't have been any way to get around the bland screenplay and the all around cheapness of the film.
- Michael_Elliott
- Oct 12, 2009
- Permalink