The Reformers; or, the Lost Art of Minding One's Business (1913) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Beware the League of Civic Purity!
wmorrow5924 July 2007
Between 1908 and 1913 D.W. Griffith directed almost five-hundred short films for the Biograph Company. Once he and his troupe hit their stride they created dozens of superb dramas that set the standard for American cinema, featuring the best acting, cinematography, and editing of the era. This particular movie, which dramatizes the director's near-obsession with the damage inflicted by "do-gooders," may well hold the distinction of being the strangest film Griffith ever made. It certainly ranks alongside Man's Genesis and For His Son with the most unusual products of the director's surviving output. Viewers familiar with Griffith's monumental 1916 feature film Intolerance will recall that the Modern Story scenario paints a scathing portrait of "reformer ladies," those interfering busy-bodies whose seemingly well-intentioned efforts to improve society cause more harm than good. In The Reformers we watch appalled as an average town is turned upside down by a group of self-appointed moralists known as the League of Civic Purity, a roving gang of Puritans who disapprove of beer, smoking, dancing, Vaudeville, movies, and just about everything but psalm-singing. This is Griffith's version of "It Can't Happen Here," a Dystopian fantasy of what the world would be like if the Puritans took over and established a state where innocent pleasures—along with some that aren't so innocent—are strictly forbidden.

At the center of the story is a family consisting of Father, Mother, Son and Daughter. Father is a stern man who appears to be a minister. When he is approached by members of the League to run for Mayor he accepts the offer and tours the town, along with his wife and the ever-present League, and campaigns on street corners delivering impromptu speeches. We notice a couple of things immediately: first, that the League is dominated by harsh, mannish-looking women in masculine attire, suggesting the Suffragette caricature that prevailed at the time in newspaper cartoons, assisted by sissified men with pursed lips, all waving their wrists about in a very campy fashion. Second, we notice that once Father becomes the League's candidate for Mayor he neglects his teenage children. The children (played by Biograph regulars Bobby Harron and Mae Marsh) reveal a rebellious streak in the opening sequence, when they put aside their homework to look at a pulpy magazine instead. As soon as their parents depart, however, the kids lose all sense of discipline. They quickly fall under the sway of a decadent friend of the boy's, an older fellow who plies Bobby with booze until he's reeling, and who then attempts to seduce Mae. (A title card helpfully identifies this guy as "A Dangerous Influence.") Griffith's point isn't exactly subtle: while the Reform candidate is out crusading against Vice, members of his own household are falling victim to the very vices he denounces. Physician, Reform Thyself!

The most interesting scenes involve the candidate's efforts to "Right the World," in the words of another title card. On the street Father and the League members watch in righteous disapproval as a hooker approaches a potential customer. Father steps in, lectures them both sternly, and sends the woman on her way. But when a smiling, pipe-smoking onlooker steps forward to congratulate the candidate, he is told to stop smoking—and the man's smile vanishes. The Reformers proceed to a cozy-looking saloon where Father orders the denizens to cease drinking and dancing, although frankly the beer drinkers appear to be quite harmless, while the dancers fox-trot in a genteel fashion. By this point we are disturbed to notice that the League and their chosen leader travel with an entourage of uniformed police officers, cops who enforce these new codes of Civic Purity with billy-clubs. This is the strangest and darkest element of the film. This man is merely a candidate for office, not an elected official, yet he is abruptly presented as a feared authority figure with his own police force, and the League members are his Cabinet.

I was especially fascinated by the sequence set in a Vaudeville theater, where a raucous crowd is enjoying a pair of black-face comics. (Here we seemingly encounter what might be called The D.W. Griffith Problem, but it's a false alarm; the comedians are plainly presented as white performers practicing the minstrel tradition of the era, and are not meant to be taken for actual African Americans.) This scene plays almost like a Keystone comedy, a resemblance boosted by the presence of Keystone regular Charles Murray as a boisterous spectator. When the Reformers and their cops march into the theater the atmosphere chills noticeably, although Murray tries to applaud the comedians when the cops aren't looking. Even when the minstrels finish, and are followed by a scene from Shakespeare's "Othello," the League members disapprove. They take over the theater and lead the crowd in a hymn, and when spectators attempt to sneak out the cops force them to remain.

In this film's brief running time the director managed to depict a nightmare world that's just as chilling today as it must have looked in 1913: a world ruled by humorless, narrow-minded prudes. While no one would argue that prostitution or smoking are healthy pursuits, the authoritarian nature of this League of Civic Purity is a frightening thing to behold, and reminds us of the totalitarian scourges that blighted so many societies during the 20th century, in the years after this film was made. (Besides, what's so bad about the fox-trot? Or Shakespeare?) But Griffith saved his thesis statement for the final scene, when the League's leader, the vice-hating Father, returns home to find that his children have quickly gone to hell in his absence. This man who believes he can "Right the World" can't even maintain the stability of his own household. And if that reminds you of any real-life public figures from the past century or two, well, I think that was no accident.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pretty funny stuff...
planktonrules7 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This D.W. Griffith film is a comedy that makes fun of blue-nosed reformers that were common in the early 20th century. It's pretty funny stuff from a director not usually associated with comedy.

The film starts in a home where two young people are looking at what I assume is a dirty magazine (by 1913 standards). The strict and old fashioned looking father catches them and rebukes them for their evil ways. Soon, a group of community minded folk come to the house to ask him to run for office. After a tiny bit of campaigning, you assume he won, as in the next scene the man and his posse of reformers are walking about town--outlawing anything that looks like fun! First, the bars are shut down, second dancing is forbidden and finally the theater is closed for showing immoral stuff (Shakespeare's "Othello" and a bit of innocent dancing).

In the meantime, because this nosy reformer is so busy telling everyone in town how to live their lives, his own kids run amok because they have no guidance. When the man returns home, he finds one of his kids drunk and the other hiding in the closet with a member of the opposite sex! While this is far from subtle, it was nice to see this film as a counterpoint to the man anti-liquor shorts I have seen that were made in the same era. While you also don't associate Griffith with fun, he was making a point about how we all need to relax and have fun in life. Well acted and made by the standards of the day.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very Funny
Michael_Elliott20 June 2008
Reformers, The; or, The Lost Art of Minding One's Business (1913)

*** 1/2 (out of 4)

Funny short from Biograph and Griffith about a happy family: the father (Charles Hill Mailes), the mother (Jennie Lee), the son (Robert Harron) and the daughter (Mae Marsh), which gets turned upside down after the father is asked to run for Mayor by the League of Civic Purity. This group is full of angry men and women who believe the world should be cleaned up under the rules they create. These rules include no drinking, no dancing, no Shakespeare and various other things. This is certainly another sly commentary on American life by the director and he captures some very nice humor throughout the film. There's no doubt these type of groups were around in 1913 since they are still around today and the way Griffith shows them as hypocrites is very well handled. The film certainly has a message in it and the message still holds up very well today. Both Harron and Marsh are very good in the film as is Mailes as the Mayor who lets the purity go to his head.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aimed at busybodies, legitimate game
deickemeyer28 October 2017
This satire, in two parts, is aimed at busybodies, legitimate game; the satirist who makes fun of them is sure to have the audience with him. This picture won many and many a good laugh. But the humor that made the laughter is never a part of the satire itself, of the cutting edge. It never is of any satire until it reaches a very high plane, like Cervantes's Don Quixote, for instance. A satire is sanity looking at insanity, the former being the spectator and the latter the one whom the spectator knows is in the wrong. This picture is a close enough approximation to this condition to be a very profitable release from the exhibitor's viewpoint. The laughter is mostly due to William Murray, though Christy Miller tickled them too. Charles Mailes plays the mayor, leader of the busybodies. Mae March and Ronert Harron play his two children. Miss March carries the tragic role with imagination and powerful effect. She is a fine actress in emotional work. The photography is clear. - The Moving Picture World, August 23, 1913
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed