![Roger Ebert](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTQ4NjY1ODc3M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjUwODA2NQ@@._V1_QL75_UX140_CR0,1,140,207_.jpg)
![Roger Ebert](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTQ4NjY1ODc3M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjUwODA2NQ@@._V1_QL75_UX140_CR0,1,140,207_.jpg)
In our corner of the movie universe, people (for example, Roger Ebert) often grumble about the coming onslaught of 3D films in our theaters. You'll also see many of the same people dismissing the phenomenon because of its bulky glasses and higher ticket prices celebrating the stunning visuals of something like "Avatar." There are some people who are happy that studios are putting money into coming up with better ways to do 3D transfers, though. Even as studios are just converting films into 3D to make their blockbusters more failproof at the box office. At the end of July, Lawrence Kaufman, the President of the National Stereoscopic Association, will convene a group of 3D afficianados at the annual 3D-Con in Costa Mesa, California. Kaufman told Indiewire about the event, "3D is a passion for me. It's my 8th year as president, our 38th year as an annual convention, we do...
- 6/29/2012
- by Bryce J. Renninger
- Indiewire
IMDb.com, Inc. takes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the above news articles, Tweets, or blog posts. This content is published for the entertainment of our users only. The news articles, Tweets, and blog posts do not represent IMDb's opinions nor can we guarantee that the reporting therein is completely factual. Please visit the source responsible for the item in question to report any concerns you may have regarding content or accuracy.