Yes, That's the Plot

An innocent woman who'd rather die in Nazi infamy than live in illiteracy.

A strong opponent of the death penalty makes a profound sacrifice by allowing himself to be wrongly executed, aiming to demonstrate the severe repercussions of false accusations. However it is revealed that he had indeed played a role in the crime, thereby undermining the very cause he was championing.

The movie positions itself as a critique of heightism and a compelling love story that transcends societal barriers. However, it opts to employ a CGI-miniature version of a six-foot-tall actor instead of casting a real short actor who could have been provided with an opportunity to portray a role typically not offered to individuals of shorter stature.

A committed Marine faces allegations of orchestrating the deaths of 83 civilians, including women and children. The trial unfolds to reveal that his actions were justified, prompting viewers to potentially accept the tragic loss of innocent lives, especially children.

Starting as a interracial love story unfolds between an Englishwoman and an Arab sheikh, challenging cultural norms of its time, the narrative takes an unexpected turn (unrelated to the plot) when it is disclosed that the sheikh is not half-Arab, as initially portrayed, but rather half English and half Spanish – an entirely European background.

Doc and Marty step in to prevent a future disaster, but a simple warning could have sufficed. Interfering with the kid's choice doesn't address his underlying personality traits, and the ensuing events aim to fix the situation, though the full consequences weren't anticipated at the time.

A historical figure, considered one of the most powerful women, is portrayed grappling with a debilitating illness and haunted by hallucinations of her deceased husband. The question arises: why opt for depicting her in this vulnerable state when her moments of vitality and strength could have provided a more compelling storyline?

The film tackles racism, securing an acquittal by prompting the jury to envision the victim as white. The outcome raises complex questions: if this argument doesn't sway the jury, it suggests potential racial bias, and if it does, it highlights the persistence of prejudices, challenging the notion of improvement. The paradox lies in exposing racism, inadvertently emphasizing its enduring presence.

Given that the film unfolds from an unreliable perspective, it suggests that the mastermind crafted an intricate plan to eliminate a potential suspect capable of identifying him. This involved orchestrating a sequence of events that drew in various witnesses, including members of the police force, thereby exposing him and associating a name with his face.

A guy whose life was so full of chaos going behind bars was the best thing that could ever happen to him.