I watch a hundred horror movies a year. No exaggeration. More if you count the films I quit out halfway through. So it's rare to find something I haven't seen before....spoiler ahead.
I've never seen an exorcist swat team who tracks demons using computer simulations generated by a mass murderer's coma dreams. That, my friends, is an original idea. If you are someone who enjoys original ideas in your horror films, read no farther, go watch it.
Still here? Okay, the atmosphere, the visuals, the acting, the pacing is all good, to very good. The special effects were hit and miss. I wasn't a big fan of the dream world visual effect, though it did make it clear that they were in a simulation. I thought 'Firebase' had better special effects. (That's the movie that brought me here.)
I'm not saying this is a flawless masterpiece. It took about 20 minutes to get going and I really wanted to see the exorcist swat team in action, but that didn't happen. I feel like it was a mistake not to show this part and it hurt the film's momentum. Yet, as a horror film junkie, there were enough original ideas and 'i don't know what's going to happen next' moments that I didn't get too hung up on the flaws.
In my opinion, the 'aggregate score' is off by at least a star, maybe two. It seems possible, that--in an industry that churns out hundreds of films dedicated to evil priests and evil nuns-having Catholic characters who try to help people, is discouraged. It also seems possible that there are people who are triggered by Catholic imagery and when they see it presented positively in a movie, might give that movie a lower-than-deserved score. Are there enough of these folks to drive down an aggregate score down by a star or two? I don't know. But 4.2 is too low for a movie of this quality. (It's closer to 5.6. Or 6.6 if they'd given us an exorcist swat team action scene).
Final note-In this decade, opinions are so politicized and agenda-driven, it's very hard to tell if people genuinely liked or disliked a movie because of its story, or if they had a reaction to the identity of ancillary characters. It's a chore to dig through the comments and try to weed out the insincere. So, I'd recommend ignoring all 'aggregate scores' for now. (On all movies.) If you like the intro blurb, give a movie 15-20 minutes of your time. You can always quit-out. I do it a lot.
To the director/crew, please keep taking chances and making films. Real movie fans are hungry for original ideas. You appear to have a lot of them.
I've never seen an exorcist swat team who tracks demons using computer simulations generated by a mass murderer's coma dreams. That, my friends, is an original idea. If you are someone who enjoys original ideas in your horror films, read no farther, go watch it.
Still here? Okay, the atmosphere, the visuals, the acting, the pacing is all good, to very good. The special effects were hit and miss. I wasn't a big fan of the dream world visual effect, though it did make it clear that they were in a simulation. I thought 'Firebase' had better special effects. (That's the movie that brought me here.)
I'm not saying this is a flawless masterpiece. It took about 20 minutes to get going and I really wanted to see the exorcist swat team in action, but that didn't happen. I feel like it was a mistake not to show this part and it hurt the film's momentum. Yet, as a horror film junkie, there were enough original ideas and 'i don't know what's going to happen next' moments that I didn't get too hung up on the flaws.
In my opinion, the 'aggregate score' is off by at least a star, maybe two. It seems possible, that--in an industry that churns out hundreds of films dedicated to evil priests and evil nuns-having Catholic characters who try to help people, is discouraged. It also seems possible that there are people who are triggered by Catholic imagery and when they see it presented positively in a movie, might give that movie a lower-than-deserved score. Are there enough of these folks to drive down an aggregate score down by a star or two? I don't know. But 4.2 is too low for a movie of this quality. (It's closer to 5.6. Or 6.6 if they'd given us an exorcist swat team action scene).
Final note-In this decade, opinions are so politicized and agenda-driven, it's very hard to tell if people genuinely liked or disliked a movie because of its story, or if they had a reaction to the identity of ancillary characters. It's a chore to dig through the comments and try to weed out the insincere. So, I'd recommend ignoring all 'aggregate scores' for now. (On all movies.) If you like the intro blurb, give a movie 15-20 minutes of your time. You can always quit-out. I do it a lot.
To the director/crew, please keep taking chances and making films. Real movie fans are hungry for original ideas. You appear to have a lot of them.
Tell Your Friends