Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Epic Movie (2007)
6/10
Not completely terrible
15 September 2013
I watched this film for the first time in September 2013, with my wife, broadcast on TV quite late at night. Not paying to see the film, not seeing it in 2007, and seeing it after some of the actors have become more familiar provides an altogether different perspective, and possibly this film's reputation deserves some rehabilitation.

The fact that we only started to watch it during the 'Nacho Libre' scene and didn't change the channel immediately I think has to be a sort of recommendation. In fact after settling into it we managed to watch it through to the end. And it wasn't completely terrible!

There's a mixed bag of humour, from very obvious visual gags, contemporary cultural references and parodies, and the whole storyline is creatively stitched together in a kind of absurdist humour, reminiscent of Monty Python.

It was quite nice during the character introduction to recognise actors like Jayma Mays, Kal Penn, and later Jennifer Coolidge, from their later appearances in hit US comedy shows: Glee, How I Met Your Mother, and Two Broke Girls. But of course six years ago they were still relatively unknown, and so that dimension of familiar recognition would have been lost. Shame. But it speaks highly that the casting director picked out such talent back then, and they each play their roles quite well.

As a TV movie it definitely works, and approached with low expectations can be pleasantly surprising. It doesn't look 'cheap': the indoor sets are very creative and well finished, the photography is pretty good, and as mentioned the talent also delivers. It doesn't take itself seriously, at any point, and frequently breaks the fourth-wall to remind you of the kind of movie that you're watching.

Even the cultural references have a kind of a point now. This films dates itself very firmly by references to the source material of the time (all of which I saw back then) so it was nice to be reminded of those other great films that I did enjoy, six years ago. I doubt I'd watch it again though. I certainly would not have paid money to see it, but then professional film critics never pay either...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gambit (I) (2012)
7/10
Quite good really
22 November 2012
I watched this film on release night with my fiancée. We had previously seen a couple of trailers for the film and thought it looked funny and interesting, although on the day I was disturbed to see find such a low rating here on IMDb.

*Disclosure, I am not connected to the film's production or any of the cast, and have no agenda here other than offering an alternative point of view.

The basic plot is already known in advance: that Colin Firth wants to con his evil boss using a beautiful Texan as bait. He travels to meet her accompanied by his friend and co-conman, Major Wingate. After watching her in a rodeo they go to a local bar to make the approach. The Major asks Colin how much is he going to tell her? He answers: "Oh, only enough for her to play her part". And the same is true of the audience. You are only told enough to a) identify with Colin's character and his motivation, and b) follow the plot to come.

We're then treated to a brief 'Ocean's 11-style' précis of how Colin imagines the con will play out from start to finish. Needless to say, no plan ever works out exactly as imagined!

The humour is very dry, never in-your-face, and this isn't the kind of film to hand you gags. Laughing our loud isn't the point. Instead there's a mixture of situational comedy, miss-understanding comedy, wordplay, and great interaction between the characters. Some of the best jokes are the ones where you have to smile ruefully when things go wrong on a bad day. I thought at the time that the screen-writing was a lot like Richard Curtis, and could easily imagine Rowan Atkinson as the lead.

Instead the best joke is Colin Firth himself, playing a little man, in Cameron Diaz's words, instead of a larger-than-life character for a change; playing it straight, rarely smiling because he's not very happy (he wants revenge, remember) and not trying to seduce the very comely Cameron Diaz, who also plays a wickedly funny character without being cast as the comic side-kick.

But, from a critics point of view, I guess, there's not much originality. You can perceive homages to other films; old Ealing- comedies like the Ladykillers, where the subject matter isn't funny but there is some great humour. And I'm not referring to the re-make, which I didn't like.

I'd like to watch this film again at a later time and see if I can. It might grow on me and become a minor classic, or it might drop to mediocre. Either way, if you watch it you have to appreciate it for what it is, rather than what it isn't. And it probably helps if you have a temperament where you can see the funny side in unfunny situations.
84 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed