2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Not that great...
13 October 2014
A lot of sex and some gore doesn't make this a good movie. You can see clearly that the budget of this one was pretty much the same as part 3, 4 and 5. A lot of unknown and not really great English actors and actress.

I think the story was too much over the top, Declan, the director of the previous three parts, just let the story simple (how the original also was). I love boobs, of course, but the nudity in this one is just too much and adds nothing to the story.

Some special effects are nice, but really nothing more than that. If you like part 3, 4 and 5 you probably like this one too. But not really something for me.
53 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zombiegore (2003 Video)
6/10
Funny no-budget zombie movie !
12 April 2005
Well, what do i have to say about this movie? There is no story, and the cast sucks :D A men who playing like a woman, very stupid... That stupid that it is funny. Sow how i said in my headline; it is a movie that is made over 2 years, with no budget! You don't have to expect great special effects, no great casting, not a perfect script but only a 90 minutes of laughing, however... You have to love movie's like this one to like it of course, and when you don't like very bad movie's with a lot mistakes, no story and no special effects, don't look it! :) The tag-lines says "Another 90 minutes will be wasted by watching this movie.." and they right, ha-ha. When i look it from a technical point the film will maybe score 1 out of 10. But, the movie is made with a lot of fun (you can see it..) and no budget, and i think it was no idea of Maarten to make a great horror movie, sow... This is difficult.. But i give it 6 points.. Why? there are much slow points in the movie, BUT the man-woman lady makes everything good :)
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed