Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Bleak House (2005)
9/10
wonderful adaptation of a masterwork
30 March 2007
I've been an avid reader of Dickens since I was about 12 and "Bleak House" is one of my favourite works by this superb novelist. Therefore, I had some reservations about this series, especially because it's really difficult to put such a major work to screen. I need not have feared: everything here is just about perfect - even the swishing camera and jarring sound effects which eerily add to the atmosphere after one gets used to them - it takes about 20 minutes, so no big deal. Most lavish praise to all actors who turn in top-notch performances. If only television could offer us more of such superb and intelligent entertainment! I think I should immerse myself in the book now and then re-watch this high caliber period drama - it's one of the best. Thank you BBC, you deserve a big round of applause.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tikhiy Don (2006)
2/10
doesn't do justice to the great Russian novel
10 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This version had been locked in an Italian bank's vaults for quite a time but now has been showing to the Russian audience... to its great dismay. Myself and most of the people who have watched the first 3 episodes are not really keen, to put it mildly. The main problem is that it was made expressly for the Western audience in the 1990 and carries mainly a love line (quite schmaltzy at that) and little emotional impact. Great book, a talented director (once upon a time), awful script, lots of factual mistakes, abysmal casting (I LOVE Rupert Everett, but he's really not made for that part). This could be a mini-series of the decade. Instead it turned out to be yet another sub-par Russian-themed drivel. Read the book or turn to Gerassimov's 1957 sublime version - you will not be disappointed. Don't waste your time on this one.
28 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
thoughtful and worth seeing...with one major(ish) flaw
5 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoyed this movie, even better than No, which was also subtle and quirky. The dialogue is flawless. Both Lepage's sibling portrayals are spot on, the cinematography tricks are engaging and perfectly pitched, as is the supporting cast. My only quip is... boy, aren't there any literate Russians in Canada? There are at least two major misspellings, one above the entrance to Tsiolkovsky Institute in (presumably) Moscow (there is no such institution in real life). The other is on the poster at the airport towards the end of the movie. And the Aeroflot announcement on the plane to Moscow sounds just a little bit accented and un-Aeroflotish. Again, this is a great movie and should be widely seen.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
horrible (no pun intended)
30 October 2003
This is one of the worst films I've seen, unlike much of the Italian sleaze/giallo genre. The actors do not know how to act, editor was on permanent leave, beautiful landscapes only make its hollowness more apparent. Avoid it, there's nothing to enjoy. Even the blood looks more artificial than cranberry sauce.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gods of Olympia (2002 Video)
1/10
what is the point?
31 July 2003
This movie (shot on video camera, incidentally) is one of the worst I've seen this year. Being gay, I thought it would tackle some of the things that I could relate to on an emotional level, at least, even if some of the so-called actors have no sex-appeal whatsoever. But I was wrong. Disjointed stories, horrible acting, this is what could give being gay a bad name, although ostensibly it's pro-gay. Frankly I would prefer an honest f**k-flick, at least you get what you paid for. Steer clear of this, it stinks.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed