Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Inception (2010)
10/10
An individual experience , not comparable to anything else you've ever seen on screen
14 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The events in Inception can be interpreted as a dream generated by Cobbs subconscious to give his traumatic life a meaningful purpose with a comforting ending.

In the real world Cobb gets Mal into drugs. Mal loses her sanity, stops caring about their children and eventually kills herself. Cobb is ridden by guilt (symbolized by the occurring train) for being responsible for his children not having a mother anymore (for having ruined their lives).

From the beginning, the atmosphere breathes with "something just doesn't seem right here" moments throughout the film, without the viewer being able to tell the actual cause. Everything that happens on screen is a dream, with exception of the last scene: Cobb wakes up in a plane, the people around him are all strangers to him. It was his subconscious that made them the protagonists of his dream during his flight home.

The film is Cobb's subconscious trip facing his (symbolic) death. His personal purgatory. As old Saito tells him in the beginning, Cobb is "obsessed with the idea (to come home)": to find peace with Mal, and ultimately forgive himself and find peace in a life reunited with his children. Throughout the film, Cobb can't see (doesn't want to face) the faces of his children, because he isn't ready (yet) to take responsibility for what he had done.

Inception begins with Cobb being given the chance to find peace: Don't you want to take a leap of faith? Or become an old man, filled with regret, waiting to die alone? … Facing old Saito, his personified destiny if he resigns, Cobb accepts the challenge and the trip begins. The solution to Cobb's inner peace lies in himself. In one scene Ariadne (Greek mythology, rather obvious symbol) draws a circular maze, guiding him to the solution: to revisit his innermost traumas and find closure for them.

Ariadne, Arthur and Eames (all the characters with a totem) are Cobb's younger projections of himself. With their help he revisits his own past. The totems are the connection, they represent the different aspects that determine the human life: plain fun, chance (luck), strategy and risk. Life is a game and you are the player.

Cobb relives the key scenes of his life. The actual events remain the same, but Cobb manages to give them a different, comforting context (achieving closure) and a purpose. This corresponds to Charles Eames' "banana leaf parable" and there's your next Name symbolism.

The scene where Robert Fisher forgives his father and recognizes his deep love for him (cries over the paper toy windmill) is the turning point and highlight of the film. At this point, after a tremendous struggle, Cobb forgives himself for letting his children down.

Cillian Murphy's physical resemblance to the young Robert "Bobby" Fischer, the chess player, is so remarkable, Nolan probably could have chosen a less obvious name for his character, to make a point with this symbolic figure. Bobby Fisher was the inventor of a randomized version of chess, that rewards the player for his creativity by giving him many opening possibilities. To win more time to achieve victory, it is necessary for the player to keep making active decisions and keep moving.

Cobb achieves closure with Mal by convincing her (and himself) that they did "grow old together", and he fulfilled his marital promise. It all happened in "Limbo", a metaphorical concept of a different reality.

At the end of the film, it isn't important if the top falls or not, it's important that Cobb left it behind. He overcame his traumas and made peace with himself (forgave himself). He is ready to face his children, meaning that he found absolution.

Many criticized Inception for its complex, hard to follow rules for traveling through the different dream levels. In my opinion, the technical rules of Inception are not important to understand, because Cobb made them up himself (and thus don't need to be consistent or even true). If you had a semester of mathematics, you probably know that on a false premise it's possible to conclude anything.

Emotionally, Inception doesn't strike all of your senses, it's mainly a challenge of and for the mind in proportions and a complexity no one before dared to put in a single film. The extraordinary craftsmanship, the technical skill and the immense care for details, necessary to put a monstrous concept like Inception into a watchable and interesting film are truly amazing.

The most fascinating thing is, that Inception is a brain puzzle that offers several degrees of freedom in trying to fill in the missing parts thus offers you a very individual experience. It remains to be a challenging brain teaser after 5 years. The more you think about it, the more it shows its vast complexity and how much different things there are to discover. The more you think about it, the more you want to watch it one more time. Its greatness and its significance get more and more obvious, the more often you watch the film.

There are tons of symbols to discover during this trip: water, obscured windows, specific colors, watches, names are loaded with symbolism, clothing details, the number 12, Francis Bacon's artwork, usage of many of Carl Jung's concepts, physical resemblances etc, etc. I'm sure I missed a few. Just open your mind and it will come to you.

The key message of Inception is that everyone is the architect (how many times did you hear this word during the film? :-)) of his own fortune. Inception is a very comforting parable of life.

Chapeau, Mr. Nolan. In terms of content, depth and complexity, Inception extends the boundaries of the medium film by a large amount. This is the new benchmark for all future directors to come.

10/10 (Masterpiece)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Veep (2012–2019)
2/10
WOW! Bad!
19 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Liking most of Julia's previous work, the new HBO production sounded really promising. Boy, what a disappointment 'Veep' turned out to be ... It's biggest problem is, it's really, really boring. Why doesn't it work? I'll try to find an answer here.

Reason 1: Monotonous, unlikeable, unauthentic Characters. All characters (Tony Hale excluded) are the same: they're greedy, incompetent, lazy, selfish, rude and cold hearted. Worst of all, not one of them is likable even a tiny bit. In politics you do not get very far without some strong personal qualities. Being smart and having good social skills probably are the most fundamental ones. The Veep and her staff are all dumb in this regard and aren't believable in their roles.

Reason 2: Really bad script / dialog. The general pace is by far to fast. Come on, give the characters some time to grow on the audience. The occasional parody of shows like 'The west wing' (with it's over dynamic pace) is OK, but please, not all the time. And who on earth did approve THIS language? There are WAY too many F-bombs, 'Sh*t this' and 'Sh*t that' all over the place, you could fill several ghetto / gangsta movies with the amount you get here per episode. And it's all spoken very rude. This is what's supposed to go on behind the curtains? Nah, I don't think so.

Reason 3: The story / Jokes. There are far to many disconnected scenes, the most of which are totally unimportant and boring. Maybe they're running for the 'most scenes per episode' record, a title once held by the (brilliant) show 'Arrested Development'. Julia did do a pretty good job there BTW. The (few) jokes are over-rolled by steamrollers of fast paced filler stuff and its easy to miss them. And there isn't really much going on in an episode. Two of the killer jokes: a) forging the president's signature, and b) the president having a heart-attack (leaving the Veep in charge) are fired out in the first two episodes without a single memorable or funny scene. How is it possible not to make THAT funny?

To summarize: there is much to much of boring cr*p in this show and it just doesn't work as a real life, fake documentary since none of it is authentic. The shaky cam is really embarrassing here, and seems like a(n) (unintentional) bad joke. There is no aspect of the show worth mentioning and leaves me extremely disappointed

EDIT: since IMDb doesn't show ratings for this one, here is my rating:

2 / 10

EDIT 2:

It's amazing how many newly registered IMDb-users praise this show being so exceptionally great. Oh, the show is too smart for me to get the humor, you say? 'Nay' to you I must reply, as the emperor is butt naked here and his entourage only makes this fact much more obvious.
34 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dexter: Once Upon a Time... (2011)
Season 6, Episode 2
8/10
Interesting start for season 6
11 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The first 2 episodes of this season are surprisingly different from what I expected, after the horrendous fifth season. In a good way, that is.

The whole crew gets a lot of screen time and the writing gives everybody enough time to become interesting. Many small and not so small conflicts between the characters are getting visible that could explosively unload back to Dex. With Deb in charge now, it seems more possible than ever she could establish the link between the BHB, Trinity and Dex and reveal his secret.

I think exactly that is the key moment all of us are waiting for quite a while now, and it is the only thing that can keep this show interesting for the whole duration of this season. Mos Def's character is very interesting, too, though. I can't wait to see where that thread is going.

The other two religious hacks are already boring the hell out of me and I hope Dex clears them sometime soon. I don't buy their motives, and the way they are portrayed: always together (but just the two of them), at night, talking nonsense, carrying doll parts around in bags, living in an old church and always looking soooo suspicious; they seem more like a farce of some lunatic Scooby Doo villains than a real threat.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Royal Pains (2009–2016)
5/10
Every episode is a clone of the previous one
19 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The good things first: I really like the intro clip and the colorful cast. The general setting is original enough to be intriguing, too.

The bad things: If you've seen one episode you've basically seen all there is to discover! The plot of all episodes is practically the same: Hankmed visits an eccentric patient having a near death experience. Hank saves the patient MacGyver style. The stubborn patient doesn't follow Hank's instructions and gets itself in repeating trouble, keeping Hank busy for the duration of the whole episode. Some boring love cr*p is happening in the background between the other characters, but that's pretty much it.

I think the biggest problem is the characters (except Hank) are not given anything to do. They do not develop, the relations between them are stuck since episode 1. And the characters do not have room to break out of the stereotype roles they are given to play. This is a shame, since I sense great potential in some of the actors. Anastasia Griffith especially, (she plays Dr. Emily Peck), she does a hell of a lot from the little the script allows her, further I really like Paulo Costanzo (Hank's brother), though the writers are especially mean to him, not giving him anything to work with, but the role of the silly clown that everybody likes. I was long skeptical about Jill Flint's (Jill Casey's) acting skills, but I'm starting to like her after a pretty good emotional scene between her and Hank in an early episode of season 3.

I didn't want to comment the typical American flair of the show, but I think it's a part of the problem. This is a feel-good show, everybody is smiling all the time, the characters are stereotypical and very cartoonesque and the dynamic of the plot is very shallow, since everything always turns out good in the end. This style of show-writing isn't interesting: the characters are unnatural, dishonest and boring and so is the whole show
24 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Soylent Green (1973)
9/10
Timeless classic with many highlights
31 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
There aren't many recent movies that really stick with me. I'm 30 years old (and by means of the average IMDb user presumably a dinosaur :) ) and I often wondered why that is. Yes I've seen a load of movies in my life, and it's no surprise that it gets more and more difficult to get impressed by a flick, the more of them you have seen. Is it the sheer mass of already consumed movies that blunted my senses? The answer is No (and I am very relieved about that). As often in real life, I was reminded by a counterexample what It was I am missing.

The 40 year old Soylent green is technically (by that I mean 'visually') out of date. We know so, because many technical advancements of today are missing in the movie that plays in a reality 10 years ahead of us (I won't talk about the haircuts, cars, telephones etc., that's secondary stuff). Does this harm the movie? No, it doesn't, because it doesn't depend on technology. In a world where you have to cycle mechanically to charge your batteries, you do not care very much about iPhones or whether you should buy a XBOX or a Playstation. Under such circumstances, the problems of the little man are of a much more existential nature.

Depicting this aspect is one of Soylent green's big strenghts. In times of poverty and need the value of human life sinks to 0 and survival is the primary goal. The means of doing so are not relevant. The young and pretty ones sell themselves, others get corrupt or thievish and the ideologically pure ones get crazy. Everybody has a price and you have to watch your back all the time. Out on the streets it's the worst jungle you can imagine.

The intimate and warm moments between friends (Heston and Robinson) and lovers (Heston and Taylor-Young) preserve humanity in the confined little space that has left for the individual. The contrast to the dangerous out-world works well. The acting is very convincing, the dialogs are good and the world of Soylent green truly feels as a realistic one, one that seems possible to occur.

Soylent green is an excellent example of a great movie. The cast is small and convincing, and the plot is simple and intriguing with enough time and room for genuine feelings. Further it gives the audience two important topics to think about: ethically and ecologically responsible harvesting of nature's resources and the raising of one's voice for the right thing. These are timeless issues every generation has to rethink for itself and within this context it's easy to recommend Soylent green for practically everyone.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Californication (2007–2014)
3/10
An old men's wet dream
30 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I watch this show every now and then, since the premise was an interesting one: the midlife-crisis of a modern bad boy in LA, the city where getting older isn't an option. The potentially good material is wasted in such a distasteful manner it's sickening. Untopped is the hypocritical morality the show tries to sell to the audience.

The show is a portrayal of two 50(!)-year old friends (Duchovny is getting 50 this year, Handler next year) on a never-ending spring-break. They f*** everything that moves: age, status or color aren't issues here. The two "boys" do not see further than the tip of their genitals. Since both of them do have women they seemingly care a lot of, their lifestyle gets them in constant trouble getting their loved ones back.

Don't get me wrong, I do not mind the bare T&A or the explicit language of the show. I have a problem with the fact both Moody's and Runkle's behavior is glorified and encouraged. The viewer doesn't want for Hank to stop going, he wants to follow Hank, see more flesh, younger, more rotten with bigger breasts than the season before. The supposedly "good" in Hank's life, his annoying wife and even more annoying daughter, are portrayed so repulsive that it seems as if Hank's behavior was reasonable and caused by circumstance. The poor guy isn't responsible for being an a-hole, society made him.

The climax of tastelessness was reached this (4th) season. Hank, who's life just fell apart (once again) over the fact he scr*wed a 16-year old (Madeline Zima, 22 years old in real life at the time) recovers his juices with Sasha, a new girl (played by 19(!!!)-year old Addison Timlin) thats looks even more jail-bait, without a trace of remorse. In my perception, there is something seriously wrong with a show where it's is perfectly normal for 50-year old's to shag 19-year old's that look like 17, while it's a big scandal to shag 16-year old's that look like 20.

Californication is a flesh light for old men, glittery and sexy on the surface but it's core is hollow, made of rubber and seriously disturbing
44 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Swan (2010)
8/10
Katharsis for the new Millennium
27 January 2011
"Black Swan" strikes deep and hard...

I want to keep this short, in order not to spoil the movie for you :) This movie is a deep surrealistic trip into the abyss of the human soul and in fact is the adaption of Tchaikovskys extraordinary and infamous "Swan Lake" ported into our time. Aronofsky presents a fairy-tale about passion, hate, love, fear and emancipation adapted to strike all of your senses.

Natalie Portman delivers a very authentic performance, you can almost smell the sweat in the dancing scenes. Aronofsky puts you in the middle of the happening and lets you percept the world through Nina's eyes and it's a hell of a trip :)

So my friends, don't miss this one, it's a true piece of art ...
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dexter: The Big One (2010)
Season 5, Episode 12
5/10
The big one indeed
13 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
the big relief of Lumen gone away (hopefully forever)! I want to keep this short, so the good news first: the bigger than life bond between Lumen and Dex that had been built up this whole season breaks. How? Lumen wakes up one day and doesn't feel like doing "it" any more.

OK, you now may think this happened a bit abruptly and doesn't make any sense at all. So does Dexter and so do I, and it seems the whole Lumen cr*p was a big hoax. Dex feels betrayed (just like me) and judging his face in the last scene he'll be back next season to get his mind straight in his old manner after this disappointment.

The dialog in this episode is particularly bad and I honestly must say I'm glad this season is over. The big shocker from last year's finale, Ritas death was wasted for the mere purpose of Dex having an empty house for a season. Now knowing Lumen had no significant purpose either, I start wondering what the writers think of their audience. I expect some interesting and believable (not necessarily realistic) character development with continuity. You can call it "maturity" if you like.

Continuity was a big issue this season, characters and relationships slaloming from episode to episode without direction or purpose. Right till the end.
21 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dexter: Teenage Wasteland (2010)
Season 5, Episode 9
10/10
I can't describe how relieved I am... Dexter is finally back on track!
22 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I have to admit, I have been pretty uncomfortable with this season so far and I didn't believe this show would be able to recover from the weird direction it had taken the last few episodes. I was proved wrong tonight. So what's the deal here? Actually it's a pretty simple formula: less of Lumen and more of Dexter and the rest of the cast, paired with a believable and personally engaging plot.

Dexter is back from zombie-land! He shows a whole spectrum of emotions in this episode (not only the weird and seemingly forced ones related to Lumen) and finally behaves like a human being again. It feels as if he returned from an 8-episode during hibernation. The Dexter/Lumen relationship gets shrunk to acceptable proportions again and this way I actually am buying it. Lumen is bad news. Dex finally gets a clear head and realizes this fact. He is helping her not because he is a nice guy, but for very egoistic reasons; a) to be able to continue his perverted hobby without feeling guilty and b) because Lumens vulnerability gives him a lot of power over her. In this episode we get reminded about his true nature.

The rest of the cast gets more on-screen time than in any of the previous episodes. I can't remember when I last saw Quinn working at his desk in the department. Or Masuka. Or Laguerta saying anything making sense. Or Deb not being shag*ed for once :). This episode was so good, I think I shed a little tear of joy when the credits started rolling.

I'll be honest with you, I do not care very much about the Jordan Chase storyline or even the Lumen character (which is portrayed very well by Julia Stiles). What I do care about is what will happen to Dexter, who will find out what about him, how he will cope with it etc. This episode does exactly this, it puts the main focus back on Dexter, on his character and his destiny. It is tense and interesting again.
33 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dexter: Take It! (2010)
Season 5, Episode 8
6/10
Boring one
15 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Well, I like the show "Dexter" so much I lowered my standards for it pretty much this season. But even applying this low standards I cannot give this episode more than a 6/10.

Let me sum this episode up for you: Dexter kills Cole, Lumen assists him. Robocop takes photos while they dispose the body. Deb is the patsy for the disaster in the club.

The important things happen in about 5 minutes, the remaining 45 minutes are mere filler with some Oprah-style dialog (and atmosphere) causing your adrenaline level to sink to zero. The exciting moments are so brief and disconnected from each other they don't change this much.

I have to be fair, there is one exception. There was one moment near the end of the episode, immediately after the killing, that could have been the breaking point for this episode, maybe even season. For a moment I thought Dex and Lumen would fall passionately over each other to celebrate their baptism of fire in the most natural way possible. The writers choose not take this path. The (slowly growing) chemistry between Dex an Lumen, that only just started to be convincing in the last episode, almost reaches an anti-climax in the end. I do not think the 4 remaining episodes will be enough to cover the ground lost in this episode.

The only things else worth mentioning are some good acting from Mrs. Carpenter and (the chronically underused) Mr. Harrington. Oh, and we get to see some bare T&A (I could have done without the A-part) finally. The presentation of this scene is so un-sexy and lame though, that it actually would have been better if they hadn't included it!

I have the feeling the writers are afraid to do anything dirty, or anything "wrong" for Dexter in this season. They've chosen to play it safe, or as another reviewer here mentioned, convenient. It is forgivable occasionally but after seeing 8 episodes of convenience I honestly doubt things will change much in the remaining 4.

This episode had the chance to make things right for this season but it failed, and it failed hard. It's sad to see "Dexter" being degraded like this...
6 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Many shiny elements but rough around the edges...
11 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I remember first seeing this movie when I was about 13 or 14 sometime in the early 9-ties. I then was somehow weirdly attracted by the grim, mystic medieval atmosphere, the setting and the characters, without properly understanding what it all was about. And one scene cut deeply into my memory then ;). You know, the one with the girl...

Since then, every time I thought about "The name of the rose" (the movie) I felt a strange attraction to it, thinking about how I should re-watch it or, probably even better, read the book. It's almost a mystery to me that it took me over 15 years to do that, until a few days ago. I bought the book and read it. I was so hooked by it, I still think about it a lot. It's a masterpiece. With the book still in fresh memory, the movie had some pretty large shoes to fill.

The scenery is chosen extremely well, I actually can't imagine a better one. The monastery feels very authentic, the Aedificium in particular. It's inner labyrinth, the library, is also presented nice, different from the book but it works well on screen.

The casting is excellent for most of the characters, though some, in my opinion, like Malachias and Bernard Gui don't seem to completely fit. The former is visually portrayed too cartoonish for my taste while the latter's accent doesn't fit in (Gui was French, not British). The issue with the accent only sticks out because the rest of the voice work is done so well. The different accents in combination with the many obscure and memorable characters (Berengar, Salvatore, etc.) capture the social complexity in the monastery well.

The best of the cast, is (ofcourse) Sean Connery. This role seems to have been written specially for him, he IS William from the book. The young Christian Slater fits the role of his young apprentice also great. The already mentioned scene with Slater and the girl is one of the most erotic I ever saw on screen.

What falls flat in the movie is the feeling of the political/theological complexity and tension described in the book. At times it feels like the cast simply is too small, most obvious in the conference between the papists and the Franciscans. The metaphysical dimension described in the book, the human indistinguishability between good and evil, between right and wrong doesn't even try to rise in the movie. Consequently, the movie lacks depth. The script further feels stitched together most of the time and it doesn't always seem logical (this doesn't really matter if you read the book, though). The acting, while good most of the time, isn't consistent throughout the movie. Some scenes should have been given a second or third take.

The story (novel), the characters and the setup of "The Name of the Rose" build the fundament for an intelligent, intriguing and memorable thriller. The experience is diminished by a (at times) sloppy screenplay, that introduces a few conveniences too much. Depth is traded off for something that almost feels like a happy ending. None the less, it will stick with you, if you liked it or not. There just aren't (m)any movies comparable to it even 25 years later...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dexter: Circle Us (2010)
Season 5, Episode 7
8/10
Improving...
8 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This episode takes it's time and finally allows the chemistry to unfold between Dex and Lumen. It works much better than I ever expected. And be prepared for "the most boring action figure ever" :).

The plot of this episode introduced a few (for me) unexpected twists. With now only 5 episodes left to the finale of the season, I'm a bit afraid that the bad guys won't get enough time to develop beyond the usual black and white scheme. I did not get the motivation of the baddies, either. Why were they moving the barrels? There was no need for that. The car crash also wasn't believable. Cole was turning left, he stopped at the STOP sign, so how the heck could he not see the car coming from his left? Of course, when you plan moving half a dozen barrels with dead women you hire a bunch of random Latinos to do the job and transport everything in a pick-up truck of your employer who is a well known celebrity through the middle of the city.

Further, Cole doesn't hesitate to show up in the police station, even knowing that Lumen is on the run and being able to identify him! And of course, he isn't even bruised after the hefty car-crash. Awesome seat-belts, really...

Laguerta probably won't survive (job-wise) this season. Sloppy police-work, as always, at the club made the whole department look like a bunch of amateurs once again. Though they have some über-gadgets for communication: A single mic that acts as a loudspeaker as well, no need for headphones! The last and probably most serious issue is that Dex still can pull off the most ridiculous sloppy stunts without any consequences. I don't feel any tension or danger for him being exposed. The promising Quinn/Robocop-initiative is already losing steam. It seems that Quinn is off (Dexters) hook and Robocop is going to take the fall alone. I really like Quinn so there is at least something positive in that.

I'm giving it an 8/10. Much of the story is rather silly, but hey, I watch this show for Dexter, the character. He makes the difference to the zillion of other cop TV-shows airing. The developing chemistry between Dex and Lumen compensates most of the mentioned flaws for me. If the writers now start to create some (believable) pressure on Dex I probably won't have anything to complain about :).
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dexter: Everything Is Illumenated (2010)
Season 5, Episode 6
7/10
I don't know...
2 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
where this show is going at the moment. I was so excited after episode 4, just to get slapped in the face by episode 5 and now this... The story is developing as expected so far and that is a good thing.

The directing in this episode was pretty amusing (Batista+Latina->Laguerta "incident", Dex hunting naked guy paralleled by "the march of the detectives", Dex setting up the weird crime scene etc.) but most of it felt like cheap Tarantino tricks used only for their coolness effect. OK, I like shows that don't take themselves too serious but it's getting out of hand here.

The problem is, "Dexter" starts feeling like "A-Team" or even worse: like "Inception". Dex seems to be bulletproof, nothing can happen to him even if he never was as sloppy as in this season. This way no felt tension ever arises, while you clearly see that exactly that (the creation of tension) was the driving intention of the Director. This mismatch causes me feeling detached from the character and I think that's why I'm starting to loose interest.

I hope the writers catch up with the directing and create a darker, more tense and less cartoonish atmosphere for Dex.
21 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dexter: Beauty And The Beast (2010)
Season 5, Episode 4
10/10
Excellent! This season has the potential to become the best of them all.
18 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Oh, it's so exciting to see where this season is heading ... :). I was skeptical after the first episode of this season, but now I think this season has the potential to become the best of them all. I don't know if this is the last season, if so, the writers are heading towards a blast finale. If there will be a succeeding season, this one will stage a perfect setup.

OK, many elements are taken from previous seasons: Deb is scared and disturbed, letting her judgment be clouded by her temper and impulse (seen before after the Lundy breakup / killing). Now Quinn is on Dexters heels (before it was Doakes). Batista has trouble with his women once again, the Dexter/Lumen alliance (before it was Dexter/Lila) etc.

What makes this episode (this season) work is the original mix of the new ideas with some of the old elements that worked well. The Deb/Quinn relationship is predestined to be fatal for both of them. Their emotional, personal and professional motives are so intertwined that the only result can be a total (lovely) mess. I see Quinn using Deb to come closer to Dexter, while Deb (who started the affair just as a soul-patch) falls in love wildly with him. Oh, and we know what happened to Doakes, so Quinn will have to be very careful ;). The Laguerta/Batista thing is also pretty messy (in a good way of course), they are both messing with their jobs and their emotions, it's possible one (or both) of them get kicked out of the department (aka series).

What also helps this season is, it doesn't take itself too serious. There are many funny moments, specially when Dex uses Harrison as bait ("better than donuts") for his "research". Apropos "research", I see the Dex/Lumen bond building an unholy alliance against her torturers but I don't think there'll be an affair between them (she is to disturbed/abused and HM, Julia Stiles just visually isn't on par with Dex' previous girls). And, last but not least, there is something about the babysitter that just feels "wrong" :). "Dexter" and women with strong European accents usually mean one thing: big trouble! I have a feeling where this side-thread might be going, but it's just speculation ;).

So, my friends, watch it and enjoy it. It's tense, it doesn't take itself too serious and it's as original as it ever was (and a bit more than that).

10 out of 10
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed