Reviews

12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Live by Night (2016)
6/10
It looks fantastic but as a drama it is severely lacking in impact and finesse.
16 January 2017
Ben Affleck returns to Dennis Lehane's work with this adaptation of Live By Night, the second novel in a trilogy (starting with The Given Day and finishing with World Gone By). Live By Night is a gangster epic which follows the rise to power of Joe Coughlin, a young Boston criminal who ends up running an empire in Florida for the Italian mob. As with The Town and Argo, Affleck casts himself in the leading role and is joined by an impressive supporting cast including Sienna Miller, Zoe Saldana, Elle Fanning, Robert Glenister, Chris Cooper and Brendan Gleeson.

The film begins with Coughlin, as the narrator, introducing himself as a veteran who has returned disillusioned from WW1 to the extent that he refuses to follow rules or take orders from anybody. As such, he now considers himself an outlaw. We see him and his crew embark on daring robberies, including a poker game ran by one of Boston's major gangsters, Albert White (played with menacing vigour by Glenister) whose moll is having an affair with Coughlin. As repercussions ensue, Coughlin reluctantly takes on a job for White's mob rivals who send him to Ybor City, Florida, in order to take over their rum import enterprise during the prohibition era. Despite initial protestations that he is not a gangster, does not want to be wedded to the mob or have to take orders from anyone, he eventually concedes to his circumstances and his need for revenge against White, and so quickly sets about establishing his presence, authority and power across Southern Florida. In doing so, he finds love, friendship and enemies as he encounters the wrath of various strands of the Florida populous, ranging from the devoutly religious to the KKK, who take umbrage with his diverse business and personal relations. Naturally, events head toward a bloody and violent showdown.

As an addition to the gangster genre, Live By Night certainly has a uniqueness to it. Thanks to the Florida setting, there is a notable feel and style to the film. Whereas the typical gangster movie might be set in dark and claustrophobic city locations such as Chicago, New York, Detroit or Boston, the story here is told against sun-soaked, colourful and expansive scenery which provides a sense of heat so stifling that it can almost be felt coming through the screen. The film also boasts some sumptuous scenery, particularly of the Florida glades, whilst the early 20th Century town-life of Ybor City really comes to life thanks to excellent design, costumes and vibrant music. It was interesting, too, to see a gangster film based during the prohibition era which told its story from the perspective of the suppliers of the alcohol, rather than the city-based recipients. Additionally, the ethnic diversity of the characters form a foundation for the depiction of the racism that was so prevalent in the southern United States during this period, and this gives Live By Night a distinctiveness within the genre.

Unfortunately, whilst Affleck has proved himself to be a superb director, this is by far his weakest effort. Hastily cut and edited, the first act in particular chops and changes scenes with such frenetic pace and frequency one could be forgiven for feeling queasy with motion sickness. This may very well be a conscious decision by Affleck, as Coughlin's voice-over thankfully helps provide some degree of constructive narrative, but as a result any provision of context, plot or character development feels completely overlooked; an issue that lingers throughout the film. Too much feels glossed over and rushed, with relationships suddenly formed and underdeveloped, whilst character motivations and intentions are under-explored and largely ignored.

Lehane's novel does not suffer from the same issues and therefore the source material cannot be blamed here. Indeed, we are introduced to Coughlin in the first novel, The Given Day, and his character, relationships, background, grievances and drive are detailed thoroughly. With Affleck's film, he introduces us to Coughlin midway through the character's reality and doesn't bother to lay a foundation for him. As a result, Coughlin's relationship with his high-ranking police officer father is barely covered, whereas Lehane uses this as one of the core influences behind his intention to live a life of crime. In the film, Coughlin says how he mourns for a lost love, but this is not something we actually get to see. Again, Lehane uses this as a key impetus for his character. Affleck's Coughlin, a petty criminal, insists on not becoming a gangster, yet hits the ground running the second he arrives in Florida setting up the empire. There are various other examples which all highlight how the events within Affleck's film are mostly conceived out of pure convenience.

Compounding this sense of underdevelopment and hastiness is an infuriating lack of any indication of how much time is passing throughout the story. At one point towards the end of the film, Coughlin refers to a girl who died in 1927, and this just highlighted the fact that, aside from references to US Presidents and the end of prohibition, there is nothing to suggest when these events are taking place or indeed how long they are taking.

It's frustratingly poor storytelling, especially when considering the strength and quality of the source material. Combined with Affleck being so prominent in his leading role, his decision as the director to use so many facial close-ups and lingering shots of Coughlin means that Live By Night essentially feels like a self indulgence piece. Ironically, his brother Casey would arguably have made a better Coughlin and perhaps Affleck would benefit from staying behind the camera next time.

Ultimately, Live By Night is a missed opportunity. It looks fantastic, and there are some excellent action sequences including car chases and shoot-outs, but as a drama it is severely lacking in impact and finesse.
34 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It won't be to everybody's taste as it is a slow burning and bleak character study. However, in terms of pure accomplished drama and story-telling, it is sublime.
10 January 2017
Casey Affleck recently won the Best Actor (Drama) award at the Golden Globes for what is arguably his best performance to date. He plays Lee Chandler, a socially awkward, lonely and tightly wound janitor in Boston who is forced to return to his home town following the untimely death of his older brother. As next-of-kin, Lee becomes the trustee of his brother's affairs and reluctantly, the legal guardian to his teenage nephew, Patrick (played by the excellent Lucas Hedges).

We follow Lee and Patrick as they form a strained bond together and deal with their grief in their own separate ways. Lee focuses on taking care of the various arrangements as quickly as possible so that he can return to Boston, whilst Patrick, the antitheses of Lee, surrounds himself with attention from his friends and girlfriends.

What makes this such a fascinating drama is not just the development of the relationship between these two, but the study of a tortured soul facing his demons and battling for redemption. It's a stunning performance from Affleck who shows great maturity and sensitivity in his portrayal of Lee. This is a character so full of self-loathing and bent on self-destruction, so consumed by shame and hurt, but is determined to do the right thing despite the turmoil this brings. He could almost be Shakespearean such is the tragedy that defines him. This is a character so compelling to watch, the audience could be on the verge of heartbreak in any given scene, and the audience's resolve is severely tested towards the end of the film during a conversation with his ex-wife (Michelle Williams, excellent as always but surprisingly lauded given her considerable lack of screen time). Seeing a younger Lee in a series of flashbacks also makes the present-day version that much more complex; the younger Lee appearing to be popular, sociable and fun, much like Patrick in fact.

Hedges deserves many plaudits himself for his performance. At just 20 years old, he already boasts an impressive CV which includes appearances in two Wes Anderson films, Moonrise Kingdom and The Grand Budapest Hotel, as well as Michael Cuesta's Kill the Messenger. As Patrick, he must contend with the loss of his father, the arrival and interference of his estranged uncle, and the potentially impending upheaval of his entire life. He is quickly thrown into conflict with his uncle, who wants to take him back to Boston. Patrick summarises his popularity to Lee; he has lots of friends, is on the hockey and basketball teams, has two girlfriends and is in a band. Lee is a janitor, "what's it matter where you live?" Patrick asks. The conflict between the two of them turns into a battle of wills, and thankfully this brings about a relieving injection of humour, particularly when Patrick feels compelled to run his love-life by Lee. Patrick has his own complexities, too, evident in a lack of visible emotion over his father's death but devastatingly abundant in his need to fix his father's boat and the panic attack he suffers at an innocuous reminder of what happened to his dad. These are reminders of Patrick's vulnerabilities and the fact that despite living an almost perfect life for a 16 year old teenager, he is still very much a dependant; a point subtly repeated every time he asks Lee for money or to drive him to one place or another.

The bond between Lee and Patrick naturally encapsulates a theme of paternity and this is something that is explored in greater detail throughout the film, particularly in the flashbacks in which we meet Lee's brother Joe (reliably performed by the ever brilliant Kyle Chandler). These flashbacks also introduce us to Lee's and Joe's ex-wives (Williams and Gretchen Mol), who personify the related theme of maternity, and the flashbacks hint at the close relationship the brothers shared, too. It becomes clear that this is not just a story about parenting, but one about family and the hardships that familial relationships can bring about, especially when dealing with loss.

Understandably, Manchester-By-The-Sea has a bleakness to it, embodied by Affleck's outstanding performance but also represented by the titular location, serving as a character within itself and in doing so as the source of conflict and turmoil that Lee must battle with. Situated in Essex County in the northeast of Massachusetts, it is a small coastal town which is portrayed by Director Kenneth Lonergan as an intimate and close-knit community in which everyone knows each other, rumours and stories are prevalent, and it is bitterly cold. Coldness becomes a pivotal element of the film; it is a cause of anguish that highlights Patrick's grief but also provides a metaphor for the repressed emotions of the protagonists, especially the hardened and guarded Lee.

Lonergan, as Director and Writer of Manchester-By-The-Sea, deserves all the nominations and awards he has and is yet to receive. With a clear eye and astute observation for complex characteristics and emotional catalysts, he combines a myriad of familial complications and pitfalls into a wonderfully sensitive story that tells of love, loss, joy and pain. With a running time of over two and a quarter hours, some may feel that this story is too long, but given the complexities and development of the characters and their relationships, it felt perfectly pitched and elegantly told. Accompanied by an almost operatic score that enhances the drama and sense of tragedy, this is a truly accomplished, polished and beautifully crafted character-based drama. Astonishingly, this is just Lonergan's third film in 16 years. With such assured talent, it's a shame he is not more prolific.

Ultimately, Affleck will take all the plaudits and like Lonergan, he deserves every nomination and award he gets. Manchester-By-The-Sea certainly won't be to everybody's taste as it is a slow burning and bleak character study. However, in terms of pure accomplished drama and story-telling, it is sublime.

For further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
La La Land (2016)
10/10
One of the most enthralling, magical and enjoyable pieces of cinematic escapism and entertainment in years.
10 January 2017
A record breaking haul at this year's Golden Globes awards gives some indication as to just how special a film La La Land is. With 7 deserved awards including Best Musical or Comedy, Best Director, Best Score, and Best Actor gongs for both its lead stars, this has proved to be a powerhouse of cinema which will be remembered for some time.

Directed by Damien Chazelle following up on the excellent and critically acclaimed Whiplash, La La Land sees Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone deliver performances reminiscent of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers in this hugely entertaining love letter to the golden age of Hollywood and traditional Jazz music.

A comedy, romance, drama and musical all encompassed into one sublime production, we follow Jazz musician Sebastian (Gosling) and aspiring actress Mia (Stone) as they seek to follow their dreams, and head down the road of self discovery and sacrifice. Having previously worked together on the brilliant Crazy, Stupid, Love (and not-so-brilliant Gangster Squad), the chemistry between the leads is palpable as they embark on a blossoming romance and enable each other to pursue their own ambitions.

This idea of following one's dream encapsulates the very essence of the movie and it is a theme enhanced by the majestic, fantastical and dream-like world which Chazelle has created for his protagonists; a beautifully crafted stage on which possibilities are endless if you persevere. Indeed, this Hollywood that Chazelle portrays is encased in a sense of nostalgia and romance for the lost magic of what music and movies were all about; art forms within which anything can happen and anything can be created. Such is the nostalgia here, Chazelle even filmed La La Land in wide-screen Cinema Scope as a deliberate homage to the style and feel of the movies from the 50s and earlier. There are references to this bygone age, too, with Mia discussing how she grew up watching classics like Casablanca and Bringing Up Baby. She even works at Warner Brother Studios where parts of the film take place and classic sets from vintage movies are seen. Sebastian, meanwhile, complains that "Jazz is dying" in a plea for this particular art to be saved yet struggles to make it relevant for a modern audience. He is asked, "how can you be a revolutionary when you are such a traditionalist?" and it is a question which was perhaps considered by Chazelle when creating this homage to a mainstream audience.

This vintage style is evident throughout the film and especially in the sporadic musical sequences in which Gosling and Stone were mesmerising as they performed their dance routines and songs with hugely impressive assurance and skill. Whereas Gosling's singing voice is perhaps on the weaker side, his delivery was perfectly befitting of the character he portrays, whilst Stone was utterly captivating in all of her routines, but particularly during her solo towards the end of the movie.

Both Sebastian and Mia are such likable characters who complement each other so well that they add a huge element of charm to an already uplifting premise. It's near impossible not to root for the both of them and support them as they pursue their dreams, and as such it's heartbreaking when we witness the sacrifices they have to make in order to do so. It is here the dramatic element comes into play, ensuring La La Land never becomes too saccharine or twee. It could have been easy for Chazelle to get lost in a world of fantasy and endless opportunity but he reigns in the nostalgia and the sentiment by bringing his characters back down to earth and reminds us that following one's dream is not easy nor simple, but that it takes hard work, perseverance, compromise and of course, sacrifice. Credit is therefore heaped further on Gosling and Stone who put Sebastian and Mia through a roller-coaster of emotions throughout, as they celebrate their successes, feel humiliated at their failures, and laugh and cry together. Perhaps the most heartening aspect of all is the way in which they support and encourage each other and refuse to let each other ever give up on their dreams; it's a hugely inspiring notion.

Complimenting this degree of restraint which Chazelle imposes on his protagonists, both Gosling and Stone deliver perfectly pitched and understated performances which also serve to enhance the sheer scale and scope of not just the musical sequences, but the production as a whole. This is perhaps epitomised by the very opening sequence; a single-take shot of an entire freeway traffic jam breaking out into a fanfare of song and dance which sets the standard for the rest of the film; catchy music, sublime choreography, and the panning out of the freeway in order to fit in the vast Los Angeles landscape hints at the grandiose nature of the production.

The music that is played throughout is not to be ignored. Justin Hurwitz had teamed up with Chazelle on Whiplash and returns here with a score and soundtrack that brings La La Land to life. For a musical, there are not actually that many song and dance routines, but music as a medium is a pivotal and consistent theme here and one that Chazelle ensures is not lost amongst the Hollywood nostalgia. The choreography also deserves a mention for enabling some truly memorable scenes, none more-so than Sebastian and Mia's first dance together in a setting which truly embodies the library of classics which Chazelle is paying tribute to.

Perfect performances (including solid support from the likes of J.K. Simmons and John Legend), fantastic routines and wonderful music all combine to tell a relatable message delivered by superbly written characters, which serves to make La La Land one of the most enthralling, magical and enjoyable pieces of cinematic escapism and entertainment in years.

For further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Revenant (I) (2015)
10/10
A modern masterpiece
8 January 2017
A gorgeously shot, intense revenge drama that depicts the unflinching brutality of both man and nature.

Leonardo DiCaprio goes above and beyond the call of duty to deliver an exhaustingly physical and emotional performance as a frontiersman who is left for dead. We follow him as he battles his injuries and the elements, determined to exact his revenge, on a journey which is depicted against the most breath-taking scenery.

Director Alejandro G. Inarritu s skillful direction and Cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki's stunning photography combine to make this a modern masterpiece and without doubt one of the greatest cinematic accomplishments of recent years.

For the full review, and further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hell or High Water (II) (2016)
10/10
Hell Or High Water is a tense, taut and brooding crime drama.
8 January 2017
Chris Pine and Ben Foster star as bank robbing brothers in this superb modern Western from Starred Up Director David Mackenzie. With a screenplay written by the acclaimed Taylor Sheridan (Sicario), Hell Or High Water is a tense, taut and brooding crime drama set in present day Texas.

The plot is simple: the family ranch is on the verge of being repossessed by the bank, so Pine resorts to desperate measures and teams up with his criminal brother Foster as they embark on a series of bank robberies in order to raise the cash to secure the ranch. They are soon pursued by Jeff Bridges' almost-retired Texas Ranger as they work their way through a number of small, near-desolate Texan towns.

However, whilst the premise here may be straightforward, Mackenzie actually offers us something hugely substantial. The quiet Texan towns and the desperation of the brothers are just some of the methods in which Mackenzie shows us how the global economic crisis has had, and still has, a devastating effect on people. We see a waitress desperate to hang onto a generous tip, houses for sale and a number of roadside billboards and posters offering loans and debt consolidation schemes. Indeed, the banks themselves are very much portrayed as the villain here, and as such it's very hard not to want to root for Pine and Foster as they cleverly seek to steal the money they need from the very branch they owe, so that they can make the necessary payments with the bank's own money.

Considering this is a story that could perhaps have been set in any town, any state, or any country even, Hell Or High Water felt very much like an homage to the genre of Western movies but also to Texas itself. The sumptuous sweeping shots of the towns and absolutely gorgeous photography of untouched prairie landscapes felt as if they were intended to show the state of Texas in both its expansive and desolate glory, whilst providing the audience with a nod to the great Westerns of old (High Noon, The Searchers and True Grit all springing to mind).

Credit must go to Mackenzie for superbly merging the old with the new here. This is ultimately a story founded on the 21st century economic crisis, yet set in what is ultimately a 19th century backdrop. One scene in particular that stood out for me was when the brothers were filling up their car at a gas station; a cowboy leaves the scene on horseback as two young kids drive up blaring out music from their car. Later, we see Jeff Bridges' Texas Ranger and his partner held up in their car as they wait for a group of cowboys to drive their cattle across the road. These were odd juxtapositions but they perhaps serve to highlight this fundamental theme within the film.

Numerous references to Native Americans further enhance this idea; the acknowledgement of what once was. Again, though, there is more substance here, in that these references serve to point out an irony that the citizens of today's America are having everything taken away from them (by the banks) as the Native Americans had everything taken away from them (of course the circumstances here are vastly different). Most of these references were made by Bridges' character; perhaps the personification of this sense of 'the old'. Reluctantly approaching retirement and making constant racist comments to his partner, Bridges is world-weary and worn out with nothing to look forward to. Tracking down the brothers is his 'one last job' and one he embraces obsessively as a means to stave off his retirement. He is the epitome of 'old school' in his humour, methods and etiquette, but it is clear he is also terrified of entering a world he is unfamiliar with. It's a fantastic performance from Bridges, who emotes and conveys awkward humour, obsession and fear in his own unique way.

Countering Bridges is the ever brilliant Ben Foster. The oldest of the brothers, he's street smart, unpredictable, ill-tempered, quick-witted and reckless; and the personification of "the new". It's his actions which give the brothers' journey an overwhelming sense of uncertainty and excitement and yet despite his copious flaws, Foster manages to make his character an endearing one.

This is Chris Pine's vehicle, though. It's a restrained and thoughtful performance, and with that an intensely brooding one which encapsulates the entire tone of the film. It is Pine's younger brother who has masterminded the whole scheme to obtain the money, whilst getting revenge on the bank that has caused his family so much grief. It is he who has asked his brother to revert back to a life of crime. He is doing a bad thing in order to do a good thing, and there is barely a scene in which Pine is involved where we don't see the remorse and the shame etched across his face. It's a role which could not be further than that which made his name (as James Kirk in the Star Trek franchise) yet one he commands with great maturity.

Mackenzie really does deserve much of the praise, though, for this fantastic piece of film making. Hell Or High Water is so steadily paced yet creates a significant amount of tension as a race against time evolves. He draws incredible performances from his leads, provides his audience with stunning visuals and touches upon themes which set this way above a typical heist movie or generic Western.

For the full review, and further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's stand-out performances from Blunt and Hayley Bennett that ultimately make this worth sticking with.
8 January 2017
Paula Hawkins' acclaimed novel is brought to the big screen by The Help director Tate Taylor and stars Emily Blunt as Rachel, a divorced alcoholic obsessed with a couple she sees on her daily commute.

With an intrinsic plot and interchange of characters and relationships, The Girl On The Train promises to be a taut, intricate, intense thriller. Perhaps the book is, but unfortunately the film does not live up to this promise.

There are various flaws, particularly regarding the pitch, pace and tone of the film; Taylor's constant cuts, edits and switching of story-arcs occur so frequently that they become distracting and result in a failure to produce any tempo or even tension, ultimately leading to a somewhat flat finale.

However, it does offer enough to maintain interest and the established source material thankfully ensured story-telling remained coherent, but it's stand-out performances from Blunt and Hayley Bennett that ultimately make this worth sticking with.

They are both terrific in their respective roles as tormented, grieving young women. Bennett's emotional performance equals Blunt's physical delivery and they are both extraordinarily captivating, drawing in and maintaining the audience's focus to the very end. They stand head and shoulders above their male counterparts and ultimately save this film from becoming an overly mundane experience.

For the full review, and further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Room (I) (2015)
10/10
It's tough, nail-biting, intense and immersive, but it is genuine and heart-felt, uplifting and inspiring.
8 January 2017
This is a story so sublimely told and exquisitely crafted, and with performances so achingly beautiful and emotive, it would be near impossible not to pull on the tightest of heart strings.

Every frame is a deliberate exploration into the themes of maternity, creation and endless opportunity; uplifting messages founded on a dark premise. The consistency of Lenny Abrahamson's masterful direction and the stunning performances make this an utterly overwhelming experience. Abrahamson even utilises an incredible score at key moments which builds to such an intense crescendo, it manages to crawl under the skin and hold you transfixed on the scene.

It's tough, nail-biting, intense and immersive, but it is genuine and heart-felt, uplifting and inspiring. This is a film that requires repeated viewings as the sheer subtleties within every scene and on every facial expression demand close attention in order to appreciate the pure brilliance that is 'Room'.

For the full review, and further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well worth a watch if you're a fan of the genre.
8 January 2017
Lord Of The Flies meets 28 Days Later in this unique contribution to the zombie-horror genre.

It's a fascinating premise in that it focuses on the children affected by the root cause of the zombie epidemic which combines effortlessly with the idea of the 'thinking zombie' and what would happen if they had the ability to learn.

Despite an uneven flow and inconsistent pace, and a sense of misplaced humour at times, there is much to praise here. The utilisation of a hauntingly brilliant score was perfect, and there is plenty of tension and suspense to keep things interesting. There are also some fine performances from a cast who embraced their characters with gusto.

It's undoubtedly Sennia Nanua as Melanie, personifying the unique idea of this story against its numerous genre predecessors, who really helps this stand out amongst them.

By no means perfect, certainly not scary and definitely disjointed, but this is something different, enjoyable, interesting, and at times utterly enthralling. Well worth a watch if you're a fan of the genre.

For the full review, and further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A cliché-laden nod to the genre.
8 January 2017
Antoine Fuqua teams directs this re-telling of The Magnificent Seven which sees Denzel Washington take on Yul Brynner's iconic man-in-black character, who gathers together a rag-tag group in order to help the residents of a small town fight back against those determined to drive them off their land.

Fuqua begins his version with a sense of drama and violence. Indeed, no sooner does the film begin that we are rattled by a series of explosions which serve as the foundations for the violence and action that is to come. We soon meet the villain of the piece, superbly played by Sarsgaard who somehow manages to convey a restrained yet maniacal, unhinged menace. He outlines (or rather reaffirms) his intentions to the townsfolk with great intimidation, leading to a gunfight which results in the townsfolk searching for help.

It's a captivating start and rolls along at pace. However, at over two hours long, this pace was unfortunately unsustainable. It's a slow middle section whilst we are introduced to each of the group. Some have more screen time than others, yet this does not necessarily correspond with the amount of character development they each receive. It's a frustrating and inconsistent period as we slowly meet each member one by one, all of whom proving difficult to relate to or care much about.

The final third sees the gang setting about making their mark in the town and ruffling lots of feathers, leading to an epic onslaught from Sarsgaard's hired guns during an absolutely relentless sequence of events, superbly constructed by Fuqua who never lets up on the action or violence. It's undoubtedly the reward of the piece, so much so that it makes the first two thirds almost forgettable. However, what follows is a rather flat closing which sadly serves as a reminder of the various flaws of the picture.

The biggest of these is that this is little more than a Western cliché. We have the close-ups of the eyes made iconic by Clint Eastwood, a saloon full of people stopping to turn and look at the stranger at the swinging doors. We have the inept Sheriff, a Comanche vs Comanche fight and even people riding off into the sunset. Indeed, one would be forgiven in thinking that Fuqua had a checklist of characters formed as a result of watching too many Westerns. Aside from the aforementioned we also have Chris Pratt's Faraday as a card-sharp, Hawke's Robicheaux as the war veteran and Vincent D'Onofrio's Jack Horne as a mountain-man.

Clichés and stereotypes aside, there are plenty of solid performances here. Hawke and Pratt certainly stood out but Hayley Bennett deserves an awful lot of praise, too. Her role is a pivotal one and in such a male dominated film, it's extremely refreshing to see such a strong female character hold her own amongst them and of course to see a young actress do the same amongst some of Hollywood's heavyweights.

A fantastic score helped add to the frantic action and also lift the slower elements of the film. The performances and chemistry amongst the main cast added a healthy dose of humour, and the action was fantastic.

Whilst there is certainly plenty here to be enjoyed, it loses its way with an overlong running time, poor characterisation, inconsistent pacing and a cliché-laden nod to the genre.

For the full review, and further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Creed (II) (2015)
8/10
An extremely well-acted, well-written and well-choreographed drama.
8 January 2017
A suitably slow burner in terms of pace; we follow Adonis 'Creed' Johnson as he arrives in Philadelphia from Los Angeles, searching for the famous Rocky Balboa in the hope of persuading him (Rocky) to become his (Creed's) boxing trainer.

For those unfamiliar with the franchise, you need not worry. Despite there being an abundance of references to the earlier Rocky films, they are subtle enough that prior knowledge is not essential to being able to enjoy this. All anyone probably needs to know is that Rocky Balboa and Apollo Creed were legendary boxers who were rivals and became friends and Apollo was killed boxing.

It is therefore Apollo's legacy that defines his son; we first meet Adonis as an angry and violent kid who never knew his parents. Upon learning who is father was, he grows up to become a deeply conflicted man who is inspired yet tormented by his father's status. As a result, he sets out to follow in his father's footsteps, but for the purpose of ensuring he creates his own legend and escape his father's shadow.

Cue relationship-building between Adonis and Rocky, as the latter reluctantly takes on the duty of training his friend's son and getting him ready for the big fight. It is a plot that I deliberately skip over because boxing films can be extremely clichéd and this was no different; indeed, it was predictable throughout. However, this is not meant as a criticism. What I love about this particular genre of film is that the focus is on the protagonist, and therefore it's easy to gloss over the predictable elements of the story as long as the character's development is convincing. This is true of any genre of course, but it is a significantly key measure of any boxing film because, as I had also suggested, 'the boxer' is always a deeply troubled and complex character, often his own worst enemy, and if that character is to be believable then you need a well written screenplay and a good actor to portray him.

Which leads me onto the performances and onto Michael B Jordan who was just fantastic as the eponymous 'Creed'. Physically speaking, he was a sensational athlete; his speed, precision and movement during the various (and excellently choreographed) fight and training scenes were incredible, but just as impressive was his ability to portray such an anguished and conflicted character. He delivers an array of emotions, convincingly portraying Creed's anger, determination, confliction and isolation, but there is also a healthy dose of comedy in this to counter the drama, and Jordan hits the humour with excellent timing and gusto. Equally as impressive is his performance whenever he was on screen with the film's love interest, played by Tessa Thompson. Jordan drops the testosterone and anger levels and seamlessly replaces them with a clumsy innocence and charm, all of which significantly evokes the audience's empathy and fondness towards his character.

Of course, the key relationship here is the one between Creed and Rocky, and thankfully the chemistry between Jordan and Stallone was evident. Credit must go to Stallone for his performance as well. Although you could argue that he has had plenty of practice playing the 'old guy' and mentor in The Expendables franchise, laughing at himself and co-stars for not being the young action heroes anymore (perhaps the perfect preparation to hand over another franchise to a younger generation), he gives an extremely sensitive and moving performance as the ageing Balboa, clearly worn out and weary from the tolls of his youth and the losses he has suffered since. The 'old age' humour is still here but it actually compliments the whole story and serves to highlight the aforementioned themes.

Praise must also be given to the Director and one of the writers, Ryan Coogler, and his team. Their investment in each of the characters and ability to explore the various themes and ideas really deserves a lot of plaudits. There are intricate subtleties behind every character and in almost every scene; in particular I enjoyed the sense that everyone had their own battles and demons to contend with, not just Creed, and this understated concept actually went a long way to mature his hot-headed nature. I was impressed to discover that Coogler is only 29 years old, and for a man of such inexperience behind the camera, this is an incredible accomplishment. Definitely a name to look out for.

Creed is both an ode to the Rocky franchise which it treats it with great respect and positive indulgence, but also a love letter to the city of Philadelphia which is beautifully photographed but also skilfully employed as a symbolism of the Rocky legend.

There are still the flaws that plague nearly every boxing film; it is predictable and many of the characters are by the numbers. However, the predictability and weaker characters are predominantly associated with the actual depiction of the sport itself, not the protagonists or the drama they create. Thankfully, this is nearly all about the drama rather than the sport (in fact, there are only 3 boxing matches in the entire film) and that helps to overlook these flaws and otherwise enjoy an extremely well-acted, well-written and well-choreographed drama.

Thoroughly recommended to anyone who wants to see a finely polished piece of character driven cinema.

For the full review, and further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Arrival (II) (2016)
10/10
Arrival is a majestic, beautifully created piece of cinema that is steeped in melancholy and flows with a real elegance.
8 January 2017
Director Denis Villeneuve has been making something of a name for himself recently for mastering gritty, intense and suspenseful thrillers (see Prisoners and Sicario for example). It was intriguing, therefore, to discover that he has branched out into Sci-Fi here with Arrival, in which 12 alien spacecraft descend on Earth and station themselves at random locations across the globe. True to form, however, Villeneuve delivers one of the most intelligent, creative and insightful Sci-Fi movies of recent times.

In Arrival, a language expert, Dr Louise Banks (Amy Adams) must analyse and decipher what the aliens are saying. As she spends more time with the aliens, she is haunted by the memories of what happened to her daughter, Hannah, which is revealed in a heartbreaking opening sequence accompanied by Banks' narration as she explains that "there are days that define your story beyond your life".

This notion of the predetermined, as well as the recurrence of Hannah, becomes a metaphor for one of the key questions of this story; would you do anything to change your life when you know what is going to happen? Villeneuve manages to enhance this notion further with superb use of imagery. The spacecrafts are colossal, frightening, looming structures that hover above the ground yet are almost featureless beyond their unusual lens-like shape. The aliens are huge; so big in fact that we only ever see their bottom halves. Both designs serve as a reminder that there is a much bigger force at play affecting our lives. Meanwhile, Villeneuve creates an element of mystery behind these shapes and designs; what is inside these strange, hovering objects? What do the aliens look like in their entirety? In providing the audience with visual reminders of the unknown, Villeneuve also manages to imply that whilst our stories may be 'defined', we don't necessarily know how or why.

If there is one flaw with Arrival, it is a minor one in that as it reaches its conclusion, we discover the real reason why the aliens have come to Earth. Whilst the build up to this point is intelligently and exquisitely formulated, the basis of their purpose feels surprisingly weak and short-sighted. Ironically, despite the film being so adept at developing the theme of life being already defined, it perhaps needed to be another 10 minutes or so longer so that the audience could obtain some degree of closure on the impact of the aliens' invasion.

Otherwise, Arrival is a majestic, beautifully created piece of cinema that is steeped in melancholy and flows with a real elegance. There are plenty of comparisons to be made to this, including Interstellar and Inception (the spacecraft tunnel scenes are very much reminiscent of the latter), and also Gareth Edwards' Monsters. However, Arrival feels that bit more taut, succinct and complete, almost effortless in its delivery and more profound with its message.

For the full review and other movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Anthropoid (2016)
9/10
This is far from a light hearted, no-brainer action romp. It's deep, dark, disturbing, intense and thought-provoking, and it's superb!
8 January 2017
In May 1942, an assassination attempt was carried out against Reinhard Heydrich, head of the Nazi forces in German-occupied Czechoslovakia and a key architect behind the 'Final Solution' against the Jews. The British and the exiled Czech Government had concocted the assassination plan together, choosing Heydrich as a target due to his position within the Nazi hierarchy, his role within Prague and for his abhorrently brutal actions against civilians. Around 6 months before the assassination attempt was made, two soldiers; Jozef Gabcik and Jan Kubis; parachuted into Czechoslovakia to begin Operation Anthropoid.

This is where Anthropoid begins, as the ever-excellent Cillian Murphy (Jozef) and the impressive Jamie Dornan (Jan) have just touched ground, removed their parachutes and set about finding their bearings. We follow Jozef and Jan as they make their way to Prague, searching cautiously for their contacts within the Czech Resistance, before stationing themselves into position in order to plan the assassination.

Director Sean Ellis delivers a hugely accomplished effort here, in what is essentially a film of two halves. With the assassination attempt sensibly positioned in the middle of the film, the first half is a slow, steady build-up laden with intricate dialogue as we get to know Jozef and Jan and the supporting players within the Resistance. We learn much of their personalities, and significantly, their motivations. Jozef and Jan in particular are not action heroes ready to fearlessly take on the Nazi army; these are two scared, on-edge and paranoid men clinging onto a belief that what they're about to do is necessary and right.

The second half picks up the pace dramatically, as Jozef, Jan and the Resistance deal with the aftermath and the reprisals of their assassination attempt, which ultimately lead to an epic, enthralling, violent and harrowing climax.

It's perfectly pitched by Ellis, who controls the pace with great assurance and uses it to mirror the environment and state-of-mind of the protagonists. Indeed, within moments of the start of the film, we see Jozef and Jan fighting for their lives; panic, anxiety, bewilderment and fear etched on their faces. The pace then slows as they set about establishing their position within the Resistance; determination, authority and motivation all conveyed but always with that undertone of paranoia and fear. The pace of the film could almost represent the heartbeats of Jozef and Jan. However, should anyone feel even remotely bored by the slower elements of Anthropoid, they would be wise to stick with it and reap the reward of being thrown into some unbelievable action once Ellis ramps the pace up.

By developing such a steady and precise build up, and drawing out the anxiety and fear of his leads so well, Ellis expertly allows for tension to softy bubble under the surface, and times it perfectly to create an explosive boiling point at the necessary moment. Every bullet and explosion is felt and heard by you as the audience (making this a worthwhile trip to the cinema!), flying shrapnel and shards of stone and glass sound as if they're inches away from hitting you, and the relentless gunfire and sense of panic really draws you into the scene to the point that you begin to experience the chaos and anxiety yourself... and that was just the assassination attempt. The finale recreates this ten-fold and further plaudits must therefore be given to Ellis for his ability to depict such intense action and play out such well crafted set-pieces against a backdrop of intricate drama and character development.

Naturally, though, praise must be given to the leads and supporting cast for many of the aforementioned points. Murphy and Dornan are absolutely superb in their respective roles, convincingly portraying every emotion one can only imagine someone feeling in such terrifying and uncertain circumstances. They probably had an equal amount of screen time, with most of their scenes together, yet both were able to convey their character's personalities and traits overtly and convincingly, allowing the audience to fully distinguish those motivations and fears between them.

The likes of Toby Jones, Harry Lloyd and Charlotte Le Bon also all did their part, Le Bon especially standing out as a victim of circumstance as a result of the operation.

Of course, this story is merely one subplot of the atrocities of WW2, and interspersed throughout Anthropoid are reminders of these. Needless to say, Heydrich himself is symbolic of the evil of the Nazi regime, yet the question remains given the severity of the repercussions that followed the assassination attempt, whether he was ever even a sensible target. This is therefore astute storytelling and far from a generic WW2 movie in which the good guys beat the bad guys. It asks questions, and highlights perhaps some of the more unfamiliar victims of the Nazi oppression.

As such, this is far from a light hearted, no-brainer action romp. It's deep, dark, disturbing, intense and thought-provoking, and it's superb! For the full review, and further movie reviews, please visit: https://www.facebook.com/JMCReelReviews/
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed