Change Your Image
railrulez
Reviews
Bharatham (1991)
Gripping family drama from the golden age of Malayalam cinema
First, let me offer my own credentials. I grew up during the late 80s and early 90s with movies from the golden age of Malayalam cinema, many of which were exceedingly good. After Malayalam cinema by and large went the direction of mindnumbing superstar action flicks and slapstick "comedies" that made you wince, my interest in Malayalam movies waned. I have since almost exclusively watched non-Malayalam movies (except for the exceptional good movie, such as Manichitrathazhu (1993) and Desaadanam (1997)). I've watched a *lot* of non-Indian movies since, and my favorite directors include Kurosawa, Bergman, Lynch, and Sergio Leone.
Now, with that background, I can say that what sets this movie apart from other family dramas back then --- and even until today --- is the tautness, suspense, and credibility in the plot and the *stellar* acting. Trust me, this movie has some of the most believable acting ever; some characters reminded me of my own family members (for e.g., the inconsequential scene where Oduvil gives Lalitha a bouquet.) Mohanlal acts a little stuck up sometimes, but I believe that was the role. The supporting cast is phenomenal with Lakshmi (edathi) deserving special mention.
But that's not it; this movie also has a massive overload of carnatic music. The songs are ones that stay with you through your life. I haven't heard these songs for well over 15 years, yet the lyrics and inflections have stayed with me. Kaithapram's really gone to town with the lyrics; the lyrics of the 'Ramakatha' song are gloomily appropriate for the occasion where it is sung.
For non-Malayalees, this movie is a great example of solid Malayalam drama that isn't one of those "award cinemas" only connoisseurs can appreciate. Please have a Malayali friend verify your subtitles for you before you watch! For Malayalees, I expect you to have watched this movie, and you visited this page only to give this movie a great rating!
The Recruit (2003)
Your below-average Hollywood "thriller"
This is not a very good movie. I thought it would be, having been impressed by Farrell's acting in a couple of other movies. But it isn't. It's made for a non-thinking person, in much the same way as CSI or Swordfish is. Farrell's a top-of-the-class graduate from MIT (of course it has to be MIT!) and a computer hacker who manages to open up an editor to write C code to get into "high-security" login terminal? Sound familiar? The rest of the movie is full of BS like this.
One can see the plot twists coming miles away (as there are basically only 3 characters), and you can probably predict the ending even if you were asleep half the movie. It's going to be unbearable for tech-savvy people to watch. If you must watch this movie, I recommend you put it on and do something else, or watch it when you're not in the mood for thinking.
Good points: Bridget Moynahan looks great (though her acting isn't very good). The rest are so-so. The movie made a few references to Kurt Vonnegut --- which actually piqued my interest for a while --- but Vonnegut's grave must be really hot from him spinning around after seeing his name dropped in this movie.
Sarkar Raj (2008)
Bollywood screws up even the ones it borrows from elsewhere.
Yes, I know that this movie was not based on the Godfather (how I wish it were). But clearly, there were bits and pieces (as well as the overall story) that showed the link.
My main gripe with this movie is this: when Ram Gopal Varma adapted it, he forgot to also take a hint and keep the movie subtle. I've not watched Hindi movies for a while (which I think gives me perspective), and I thought this movie was worse than the blockbuster superhero-type crap that Hollywood makes (spiderman, iron man, etc.).
First off, does every dialogue have to have some music to emphasize it? I can understand Hindi just fine, thank you. I do not need some loud eerie music after every sentence the Sarkar utters. This is almost like writing a 1000 page essay where every word was in caps, bold, or underlined.
Second, they just *have* to make each villain have his "own" trait. Vora with his nonsensical humming, the other dude with his stupid metaphors, the killer with his permanently-on gloves (in 30 degree weather, I bet). Perhaps they hope to start a new meme (in real life). In any case, I found it childish.
***spoilers in the following two paras***
Third, Bachchan's long-winded explanations near the end: where did they get all that? Out of Ram Gopal Varma's ass? There was *nothing* in the movie to indicate that the plot could involve some of Sarkar's friends (except the car explosion, but we already knew that the Kanga guy was bad). Presumably Vora confessed when he was being questioned, but then do we need Sarkar explaining everything to Aish with the smirk of a genius who has figured everything out? Absolutely appalling.
Fourth, what's with Aish taking over the empire? She was the business partner who had a crush (just a crush) on Shankar, and when he's shot, she cries like he was her lord and master. And what's that with the corny last dialogue? Suddenly she transforms from a whiny girl to a cold mafia boss? Ram Gopal Varma seems to have missed the fact that the best parts of the Godfather movies were the transitions themselves, like Michael from being just the youngest kid to being the Don. These are the things that should be shown, not cast away with lame one-liners.
***end spoilers***
Perhaps Ram Gopal Varma believes this is what the Indian public likes. I guess there's plenty of evidence to support this, considering this movie is "better" than a majority of Bollywood movies. But this movie should not be judged comparison to those (e.g., because it has no songs and such). In the end, it's just like the rest of them: a bunch of crap that's spoonfed Bachchan style. I pity the state of Bollywood cinema.
5 stars out of 10 is generous.