After seeing this film I was wondering what imdb viewers might think of this star studded production. And true to my previous experience, it's a bit off the mark in my opinion. Being sophisticated viewers who appreciate the myriad elements of filmmaking, I can't imagine why imdb voters granted Afterglow a 6.3. This would imply that this is a film worth seeing.
Even from a film historian/maven point of view, the release of this film doesn't seem to contribute much except to reiterate that the best of actors often appear in turkeys and that as long as receipts cover the cost of advertising it's better than leaving a film in the can. It also proves that good acting isn't enough to carry a film. Don't take my word for it; see this film and you'll think twice before trusting the imdb viewer poll again!
Even from a film historian/maven point of view, the release of this film doesn't seem to contribute much except to reiterate that the best of actors often appear in turkeys and that as long as receipts cover the cost of advertising it's better than leaving a film in the can. It also proves that good acting isn't enough to carry a film. Don't take my word for it; see this film and you'll think twice before trusting the imdb viewer poll again!
Tell Your Friends