58
Metascore
24 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 75Entertainment WeeklyLeah GreenblattEntertainment WeeklyLeah GreenblattIf Bening’s genteel British accent sometimes feels a little wobbly, her character is by far the most vivid force in the film.
- 75The Film StageJared MobarakThe Film StageJared MobarakWhile things do ultimately get heavy-handed at times (Grace comparing Edward’s act to murder is one thing, him comparing it to the utilitarian sacrifice of war is another), it never gets boring.
- 75Chicago Sun-TimesRichard RoeperChicago Sun-TimesRichard RoeperTo Annette Bening’s credit, she finds just the right notes to illustrate Grace’s capacity for love, as well as her special gift for never letting up and driving you a little bit crazy.
- 70Screen DailyTim GriersonScreen DailyTim GriersonA modest, tasteful family drama ... None of this is terribly original, of course, but the leads consistently mine the complexity in Nicholson’s script.
- 60The Hollywood ReporterTodd McCarthyThe Hollywood ReporterTodd McCarthyHope Gap may engage the mind up to a point with its pithy dialogue and resourceful players, but it offers little insight into the complexities and wages of wedlock.
- 60VarietyPeter DebrugeVarietyPeter DebrugeSlow and stuffy, like a filmed play, but also considerably more nuanced and mature than your typical relationship drama.
- 58The PlaylistGregory EllwoodThe PlaylistGregory EllwoodThe problem, unfortunately, is that Hope Gap is based on Nicholson’s play “The Retreat from Moscow” and the proceedings never really leaves the theater. Despite the director’s attempts to throw in [a few] drone shots to break up the drama and make the affairs inherently more cinematic, there are few scenes that don’t seem as though they would be more intriguing played out in front of a live audience.
- 50TheWrapRobert AbeleTheWrapRobert AbeleWell-acted, understanding, and literate ... But when the emotional honesty still doesn’t make for compelling drama, you’re left wondering why, even with all the lights on, there’s a conspicuous lack of galvanizing human detail in the contours of this story.
- 50Washington PostAlan ZilbermanWashington PostAlan ZilbermanA slight, yet inoffensive tale, inspiring little more than a shrug, thereby making it hard to either wholeheartedly endorse or strongly criticize.
- 40The GuardianBenjamin LeeThe GuardianBenjamin LeeNicholson fails to give his film the specificity and emotional depth required to make it seem necessary. We’ve been here before and nothing in the film’s 100-minute length truly justifies why we’re back here again.