Gangster Land (2017) Poster

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
A Little Too Polished
kirbylee70-599-52617930 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a sucker for a gangster film. I grew up in the days when classic films played on TV all the time on UHF channels. My film education included watching those movies made by James Cagney, Edward G. Robinson and Humphrey Bogart when they played the toughest gangsters to be found. I also have felt that THE GODFATHER is perhaps the best movie ever made. So gangster films are a genre I enjoy.

GANGSTER LAND takes a look at the Capone mob in Chicago as seen through the eyes of "Machine Gun" Jack McGurn (Sean Farris). McGurn's real name was Vincenzo Antonio Gibaldi, but as he explains in the film boxing promoters were more inclined to book Irish fighters than Italian. As the film opens up that is McGurn's dream, to become a professional boxer. He's good and could actually make it. But when mobsters kill his father in front of his store, McGurn sets off on a path of revenge.

Taking up with a young Al Capone (Milo Gibson), the second man under Johnny Torrio (Al Sapienza), McGurn slowly develops into an asset used to enforce the rules of the street for the gang. His abilities come in handy because this is just as a war among the Chicago mobs of Torrio and George "Bugs" Moran (Peter Facinelli) are coming to a head.

Mobsters are dying everywhere, shot in the streets of Chicago to the consternation of the honest police seen here as Detective Reed (Jason Patrick) and Detective Boyle (Sean Kanan) while corrupt officials continue to take payoffs in return for a blind eye to the issues at hand. This blind eye is what eventually leads to the FBI sending in Elliott Ness and his crew to take down Capone.

Jack moves up the ladder of success in the mob and picks up a steady girlfriend in the process named Lulu (Jamie Lynn-Sigler). Lulu has dreams of fame and uses her contact with Jack to help achieve that but it's not near what she wanted and while she loves Jack there is a bit of fear mixed in as well.

Eventually the infamous St. Valentine's Day Massacre makes its way into the story, mainly because many felt that McGurn was the man responsible for planning the deadly attack. Its ramifications on the mob wars in Chicago would be lead to peace for a while and eventual payback. It remains one of the most brutal killings of all time. It will also lead to the inevitable finale of the film.

While GANGSTER LAND wants to become a major player in the world of mob films the odds are against it. To begin with there are so many great films in the genre that it will never be an easy task to achieve such a lofty goal. But here we have more than one issue going against it. To begin with the film seems too pristine, too clean in both the costuming and set design. Everything is too new and doesn't have that sense of realism in it that would have made it more believable.

The story seems fine but the dialogue seems stiff at times and feels more like a parody of classic gangster films than an addition to that catalog of greats. Even the actors at times felt like they were wondering if the lines they were saying fit or not. This is not to say the acting here is sub part. As a matter of fact all involved do their best to bring life to this somewhat lifeless story.

Farris has the tough job of making us feel sympathy for McGurn while at the same time making him menacing. He falls short of the menacing portion here offering a scowling bad guy as opposed to one who feels deadly. Gibson, son of actor Mel Gibson, does a solid job here but isn't given more to do that make proclamations of anger or act as a consoling confidant of McGurn. Sigler, whose ties to the cable series THE SOPRANOS would seem to make her a perfect fit shows that her acting skills are not the greatest and odds are parts in lesser known films will be her career from here on.

All of this being said it might seem as if I'm piling on negative comments on the film which isn't quite the case. Taken on its own the film does offer an evening's worth of entertainment for crime fans or fans of the genre. But when the bar is set so high with the films that came before this one, reaching that bar is not an easy task. It might not reach that bar but at least it makes an attempt to do so.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nothing Gangster About This
Thugs_cry9 January 2018
If you're a fan of mob movies, this will be a heavy disappointment. The storyline isnt that engaging as much as the actors try to do their best to imitate the gangsters of the 20s/30s
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nothing New or Exciting Here
gsfsu4 December 2017
Unless you already know the main characters making up the various Chicago mobs of the 1920's and 30's you will most likely not understand this movie. It is mostly a collection of well-known incidents (the St. Valentines Day Massacre for example) and extreme violence along with standard "mobster meets dance joint showgirl" interludes.

Because the entire story of the Chicago mobs are not explored in greater detail and the actors don't look much like their real life counterparts it is often difficult to follow the action when one gang is attempting to waylay the other(s). Even the 1950's TV program "The Untouchables" offered a lead-in before each episode that explained a bit about the history. This movie just begins cold.

I gave the movie a 3 for the photography, sets and costumes but the storytelling leaves a lot to be desired. Anyone who knows the actual history of gangs in Chicago will wonder why they made this movie.
25 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Did someone actually edit this movie?
arshteynberg8 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Let me start by saying, that I went into this movie with eyes open. I have loved gangster films since I was a kid. I can also quote most lines by heart from some of the most famous (no-plugs needed).

What I find awful, is that the only basic element that is redeeming about this film, is the movie score. They literally try to use it to mask all the drawbacks of the film in scores of scenes.

There are scores of anachronisms in the film (I added one in the beginning of the film about the $100 bills).

The acting is B-level at best. The scene of the Valentine's Day massacre with a cheesy one-liner, and over the top yelling by Machine Gun. Mobsters were at times animals, but the lame revenge plot really doesn't do much. Jamie-Lynn Sigler was better in her role as Meadow Soprano than Lulu. The plot lines are weak, and the nepotism of the Gibson name shines with Milo. They really could have basically used anyone to play Capone, and might have been better (I think my high school acting chops might have brought in bigger ticket sales).

There is very little in terms of backgrounds and areas to present the landscape of Chicago, rather than a small Hollywood backlot. If the characters had a strong enough presence or view-ability element, then perhaps that would have pulled the movie together.

All-in-all, I wouldn't even count this to be a gangster movie, as this would insult even the lower level flicks like Crazy Joe, without even being compared to the modern and classic greats like The Public Enemy, Goodfellas, Godfather, etc.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A jumbled mess - first paragraph has no spoilers, just a warning to save your time/money
RareMovieCritic25 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a jumbled mess. I thought of what went wrong in the film and how it could've been fixed, but in reality, this film should not have been made. This is the very definition of genre fatigue. Before you consider watching this film, I suggest to you reading the filmographies of the director and the writer. The director's films average around 3.5/10. Don't say you weren't warned.

Spoilers:

The mistakes are plenty - anachronisms, the dialects/language is off, the lighting is abysmal, i.e. daytime TV quality, the story is essentially bad, the acting is bad in two ways - unnatural movement (dying, shooting a gun, falling, etc. reminds me of teenage films on Youtube) and poor line delivery (the breaks between... phrases should be somewhere else), I could go on, but should I?

The film also tries to do many things at once and fails at everything. What was the point of the boxing? It then advocates a pro-gov, but anti-big business agenda for the prohibition, but then shows the government, or in this case, the cops, as corrupt and racist, with the mafias as the good guys who just want to serve the working man a cold brew at the end of a hard day of work. The cops use slurs more often than real racists, in a kick-the-dog trope, to establish that they are the bad guys in this film. I'm not sure how the film justifies it though - bootleggers/moonshiners/smugglers are innocent people subverting the system, drinkers are innocent, the gov is free of guilt (it's the Rockefellers that pushed the state to prohibition, according to this film), but the cops, who are part alcohol-consumers, part of the bootleg industry and part of the blameless state are given 100% of the blame.

I don't know who this message is for, if the film draws a (imaginary) parallel of gas-vs-ethanol with modern day fossil fuel vs renewables, but there's also a bit of feminism sprinkled in, which is not actually a flaw, but adds to the jumbled mess this film is. The issues are brushed upon and not explored, and the film itself is done in a noir manner, making the issues seem out of place in what is a cheesy revenge flick.

I don't know who could survive 3 seconds of two automatic machine-guns firing at him from close range, but our friend the boxer here can, although he was a "still a bit sore" after.

This movie appears to be made by someone who is a fan of gangsters, but whose point of reference is gangster movies. It is a cover of a cover of real life.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wow.
bajabob815 August 2018
This is probably the worst acted and directed piece of **** that I have ever seen. Like a bad high school play.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Snazzy clothes & lots of fedora's
mwddurkin-623-6871898 January 2018
The fact that the movie promotes Jack McGurn as Capone's second in command tells you all you need to know about the authenticity of this movie. Another movie in which everyone in the world is young and good looking and they all date really pretty women. Oy. Take a look at Capones wife, in reality she was more along the lines of Roseanne. But you got lots of gun play and the costumes are nice so if thats enough for you, you got that.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
WTF
robertd-8371713 May 2019
I have seen some shocking movies over the years but this one really takes the cake. Some fairly talented actors have blotted their careers with this pile of faecal matter. The writer should be black listed and the director fitted with concrete slippers and taken on a one way fishing trip.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not Too Bad But Inaccurate
nebk18 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Gangster Land is a small budget action thriller chronicling the rise and fall of Al Capone and his right hand man "Machine-gun" Jack McGurn (born Vicenzo Gibaldi). The movie is however done in very broad strokes and offers very few factual details and frequently depicts events inaccurately.

The acting is relatively fine with the main roles being played by Milo Gibson (Capone) and Sean Faris (McGurn). Jason Patrick, Jamie-Lynn Sigler, Peter Facinelli and others act well in their supporting roles. Obviously the movie was done on a tight budget so there are no massive special effects to speak of. The problem with the film lies in the fact that it feels very very rushed and very little is explained. There is the usual look at bootlegging, speakeasies, Thompson Machine Guns and the main character who falls in with the wrong crowd after trying to be honest. So it has all been seen before. The events depicted however are not true as the reality was quite different regarding Jack McGurn. There is also no real mention of the numerous gangs and mobsters involved in the 1920s and 1930s prohibition era gang wars. The ones that are mentioned however are not given any depth due to the length of the movie or lack of. Overall this movie is not the worse way to spend 85 minutes but it could have been much better had attention been paid to accuracy and character development. A tentative 6/10.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
nope..
mrrebel-8038228 January 2021
Daddy!? can I have some money? me and my friends are gonna make a movie.. sure Milo be home by supper..
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Reminds of Godfather The Game in real action
lukedaking12 March 2021
This film is awesome, if you have played Godfather The Game this film essentially allows you to play it out in real life. Great acting, great storyline and very enjoyable watch one of my favourite films.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Violence is my business."
classicsoncall18 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
There are only about a dozen reviews for this picture here on IMDb (as I write this), and most of the writers pile on it pretty good. Granted, it's not in league with "The Godfather" or "Goodfellas", but I don't think it's as bad as the handful of reviewers giving it one or two lines of criticism claim it to be. Now I do have a list of gangster films I've seen and reviewed here on IMDb, and out of ninety one pictures so far, it comes in dead last when ranked by IMDb viewer rating. Still, it's not as bad as some of the old time clunkers I've seen like 1942's "The Boss of Big Town", the same year's "Baby Face Morgan", or the 1972 flick "Crime Boss". If you're going to razz a film simply because it didn't meet your personal standard, then maybe some perspective is in order. What I think the picture does successfully is put into context the various mobs prevalent in Chicago during the Prohibition Era, and how they jockeyed for position via subterfuge and violence, along with the corruption of city police and judges to look the other way. Familiar historical names dot the cast like Johnny Torrio, Al Capone, Bugs Moran and Dion O'Banion, with boxer turned gunman for the mob, Jack McGurn (Sean Faris) in a centrally cast role. You've got your expected shoot-outs among the crime organizations, with the capper being the St. Valentine's Day Massacre, McGurn's personal answer to a prior shooting that left him severely damaged. The story line spans a decade and a half from 1922 to 1936, and as with a lot of the major crime figures of the era, this one ends with the assassination of Jack McGurn at the hands of Bugs Moran. He never did, as his boss Capone suggested, become a 'bag man in the 'burbs'.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Game Dialogues
cosimomercurio18 September 2021
If you'll watch all the movies in the world less than this so, read a book.

It's very low quality movie, the dialogues appear that are take from some playstation videogame, embarassing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
my notes
FeastMode24 July 2019
Useless. super boring. i was 0 invested in anything. couldn't get thru it, even on fast speed (1 viewing)
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Strictly A Bargain Bin Film
gsbltd7 May 2021
Since others have adequately furnished accurate reviews of this movie's many shortcomings, I'll only add that there's a very GOOD reason I found my Blu-Ray disc selling for one ONE DOLLAR in a discount store. It's already been donated to charity.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just a very bad film.
fwdixon18 July 2021
I really wanted to like this film seeing as I've read just about every book about Capone and the Chicago Outfit ever written. Unfortunately I was severely disappointed. The film is loaded with historical inaccuracies, such as calling Northside gang leader Dean O'Banion "Dion", using modern currency instead of the old style large bills and numerous other anachronisms. The script was apparently written by a high school student and the acting is uniformly bad. If you aren't familiar with the 1920s Chicago gangster milieu, you'll probably be confused about just what's going on in this picture. All in all, my advice is to not waste your time watching this. Some old "Untouchables" episodes are far more entertaining and more historically accurate.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Theatrical
sergelamarche15 August 2018
The film is done well enough and the story is compelling. The setups are often theatre and the play as well. It is however a good rendering that is probably more accurate than the hollywood threatment so far.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Enjoyable mobster opus
Woodyanders11 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
1920's, Prohibition-era Chicago. Former amateur boxer Machine Gun Jack McGunn (a fine and likeable performance by Sean Faris) rises through the ranks as a top enforcer for the notorious Al Capone (well played with ferocious gusto by Milo Gibson). Things heat up when Capone becomes involved in a fierce territorial despite with rival mobster George "Bugs" Moran (an excellent portrayal by Peter Facinelli).

Director Timothy Woodward Jr. Keeps the involving and entertaining story moving along at a brisk pace, maintains a tough gritty tone throughout, offers a flavorsome evocation of the period setting, and stages the exciting shootouts with aplomb. Moreover, it's acted with zest by an enthusiastic cast: Jason Patric and Don Harvey as no-nonsense detectives determined to take Capone down, Jamie-Lynn Sigler as feisty moll Lulu Rolfe, Mark Rolston as the ruthless Dion O'Banion, Michael Pare as the hard-nosed O'Connor, and Al Sapienza as the suave Johnny Torrio. The bloody'n'brutal violence packs a savage punch. Pablo Diaz's crisp widescreen cinematography provides a pleasing polished look. Samuel Joseph Smythe's robust score hits the rousing spot. An on the money crime drama/thriller.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rushed, But Solid
michaelgarykelley199425 January 2021
Where I found myself very entertained by this movie and the excellent performances within it (especially by the lead and the guy playing Al Capone), there are MAJOR flaws in this movie. The biggest of these is the pacing. Major time jumps happen constantly. This film could've benefited from a two-hour runtime. Seriously.

Overall, I really enjoyed it. I think this director tried his best, and actually accomplished some awesome work, here. But it needs some re-editing hahah.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not too bad, I enjoyed it as a fan of the Genre
dcumens17 September 2020
I'm not sure why this movie got poor reviews, it was entertaining, enjoyable to watch, some action, and a decent story. No it's not the godfather or goodfellas, but lets be honest what is? Those classic mob movies just don't seem to be reproducible / being made so if you're a fan of mafia movies its a good watch.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed