"Outlander" By the Pricking of My Thumbs (TV Episode 2015) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Another good episode
mcampbelljh112 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I very much like episodes that gives us insight into the lives and challenges of our favorite characters (Claire and Jamie). This episode capitalized on that, it was fast paced and poignant.

The opening scene blew me away. Sam Heughan and Caitriona Balfe sure know how to act explicitly sensuous sex scenes. But it's not just sex for the sake of sex, it's sex that lets the viewers into the growing love relationship of Claire and Jamie and I like that. From virgin to expert lover in 3 episodes, Jamie's surely is a quick learner. Claire seems to be enjoying her new husband's talents. The show doesn't over do the sex, it's just the right amount, then on with the story of the lives of the character. The sex fits into the story line and thus has more meaning to this viewer.

Claire is coping with living in a world she doesn't really understand. This episode is very much about that realization. She has one female friend (Geillis played by Lotte Verbeek) and that friend is challenging to say the least. When Claire discovers Geillis sold an evil charm to Laoghaire (played by Nell Hudson), she goes to confront Geillis and finds her dancing naked in the woods, realizes she's pregnant and learns of her lover. (Nice scene by the way and Lotte plays Geillis to perfection.) Geillis and Claire's relationship is a mystery of sorts. Claire is good vs Geillis the wicked yet they get along because they are both outsiders to the world they find themselves in. Later in the episode, Geillis murders her old rich husband and Claire knows it yet she still wants to protect her because she is her only friend.

Geillis, on the other hand, is all about herself; she thinks she's moving up in the power structure of the clan by having an affair with Dougal (war chief of the Clan, brother to the Laird). After Colum learns of the affair and he suspect's Geillis has other motives, he forbids his brother from marrying her and banishes him from the castle (not in the book). She thinks he will protect her for the sake of his child. She will do anything to gain more power (marrying an old obnoxious man for his money, murdering him, having an affair with a married man, using witchcraft and spells). I like the role of Geillis she's an interesting character and I think Lotte is superb in the role.

As for Jamie, we see him trying to get back his estates and his life as Laird in his own right. Now a wanted murder because of BJR he is stuck hiding in the lands of his uncle. But longs to return to his own home. In order to do this he bargains with the Duke of Sandringham to be his second in a duel with the McDonald clan. Well, the after duel deteriorates into a fight where Jamie fends off 3 of the McDonalds and in the process gets himself wounded again. Not a scene in the book but it worked OK. It adds a bit of male sword play for the men in the audience, not to mention, Sam finally gets to display his sword skills which I'm sure made him happy.

We also have Claire going behind Jamie's back to bribe the Duke into helping Jamie with her knowledge of his relationship to the Jacobites (again not in the book and this was a bit unrealistic). A powerful man of those times would have just had her killed without a second thought for threatening him. So I'm not sure why they put that in. In the books, the Duke alliance to the Jacobites wasn't explicitly defined until the second book. I think it would have been better to keep this a mystery and build up more character suspense using his duel loyalties like Diana did.

The one scene I did not like was Dougal out of control after his wife's death threatening all his own men in a drunken rage. I don't see this as Dougal's character at all. Also Colum banishing Jamie for his fight with the McDonalds (none of this was in the book and it doesn't make sense with what is to come). Dougal and Colum should be deviously collaborating on the clan's future not fighting with each other.

What I liked about the series is that it does try, for the most part, to go to the depth of the characters thoughts and feelings much like the book did. I think there is a wide discrepancy in the scriptwriting (some good like this episode, some not as good like the last one). I think the production team should be working on improving that. Better internal reviews, perhaps sharing dailies with more people who know the books well before the episode is finalized to check for inconsistencies in the story lines and quality of production (especially where the scriptwriting/editing is concerned).

The acting is always good, I love the facial expressions by Caitriona and Sam. Nell and Lotte do a great job as well. I do not like some of the scenes with Colum, too stiffly acted by Gary Lewis. I've seen him in other productions and I think he can do better. In contrast, I do like Graham's acting manner. I think he carries Dougal's power, and deviousness well.

This episode was pretty good for the most part. The series still has my interest.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nicely Balanced Episode
brizosdream12 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
By the Prick of My Thumb- Episode 10

I enjoyed this episode. It seemed a lot better written than the Episode 9. More cohesive even though it didn't follow the book completely, what new stuff that was added seemed to fit well with the original book's plot. In addition, there was more of Claire and Jamie lives and relationship, which appeals to me.

Lotte and Nell also did fine work. The return of Geillis was delightful. Geillis is such an interesting character (even though she is a murderous witch, pregnant by Dougal a married man). I'm also glad Geillis killed Arthur (not a very interesting character). Her witches scene in the woods was great.

Nell's scenes with Claire were also well done. Laoghaire began to show her true colors as the love crossed vixen she is and a sneaky little bitch as well when she arranges to have Claire at Geillis' house during the arrest of Geillis.

The opening sex scene between Jamie and Claire was very sensually filmed without really showing too much skin. Caitriona Balfe can fake an orgasm like no one I know. I'd hate to be her sex partner, you'd never know if the orgasm was real or just great acting ability (LOL!). As for Sam Heughan, well all I can say is who wouldn't want Jamie going down on them. Humm..

Sam's scenes were well written and acted. His interactions with the Murtagh are always a favorite. I also liked the scenes at the Duke's estate, and his fight with the McDonalds. His scene's with Claire and the changeling.

Dougal's riff with Colum over the Jacobites wasn't noticeable in the book at this point in the storyline. Dougal in the book always deferred to the Laird (Colum) and the two were more acting as cohorts in most things (except for his womanizing with Geillis which Colum did object to), I don't mind them moving this up a bit in the storyline however, without Dougal being on Colum side Colum wouldn't of lasted a week on his own. In the book, Jamie left Claire to go hunting with Dougal and the Duke of Sandringham. This added story plot of having to leave to watch Dougal, I don't understand the need for the change. It seems at this point an unnecessary change, and when Jamie does return to save Claire (a bit of a spoiler if you haven't read the book) I'm not sure how that's going to play with Colum's order to stay with Dougal.. (it's these inconsistencies that bother me).

What I really liked about this episode is that there was less history and more scenes about the inner lives of the characters. Hopefully, the rest of this season and next will continue on in this direction. For Outlander is a story about people, who live in the historical settings of the times, and experience the adventures as their lives move on. The history adds to the story line but is not the main interest (except for perhaps Ron). The main interest and success of the book lied is the people (Jamie, Claire and their families Bree, Roger, Fergus, young Ian, Jenny and older Ian). I think this episode had just about the right balance of history and people. That is important to keeping the series interesting..

Good Job..
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
1x10 review
jackDee-5656514 October 2020
Another great strong episode, not as good as the previous two but still pretty enjoyable, more than the rent episode
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another memorable episode
lluca-4774823 June 2020
Episode in line with the whole show: memorable scenes and lines, captivating and beautiful. Cant get enough of Claire and Jamie's chemistry.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Uneven but Solid Episode
jmansmannstjohnslrev27 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This episode serves as a reminder that Outlander is at its very best when it is character driven. The best and most memorable installments are often times where plot wise, little to nothing happens, allowing the viewer to really hone in on each characters emotions, feelings, motivations, and desires. By the Pricking of My Thumbs is a solid episode, but is loaded down with plot points designed to serve future episodes. There is nothing inherently wrong with this but it does take away from some of the character moments that have made the series what it is.

Notwithstanding, the episode isn't without its high points. The Duke of Sandringham is a welcome addition. In a world populated by aggressive characters, he stands out as someone who appears weak and effeminate yet is powerful, untrustworthy and likely a dangerous person to make an enemy out of. Jamie and Claire's relationship hits a different mark in this episode as well. You can see its evolution; they are beginning to function as a unit, with both Claire and Jaime working the Duke of Sandringham to move forward the Petition of Complaint. And of course, you have to mention Claire's confrontation with Laghorie. Claire really stands out in this episode, her assertiveness, her command of the people around her. She's come into her own in the past few episodes but as is often the case in Outlander, there is always a cost associated with efforts to challenge the orthodoxy. On to the Witch Trial!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
not the best episode for sure
eulchen512 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I actually didn't like this episode very much. I can't remember right now how exactly things were in the books, but while watching this episode, some things really didn't add up for me. First question for me, when only judging the TV episode: why does Claire consider Geillis a friend? I mean, at all? Since she has met her the first time, the woman has "lunatic" written all over her face, she openly shows that she doesn't care for anything but her own well-being, and she said some rather nasty things to Claire already. That said, Claire really drove me crazy with her stupidity here. After Jamie spanks the living daylight out of her shortly before because she didn't do what he told her to, and she promised to do what he says in important matters from now on - what is the next thing she does? After Jamie tells her in a very urgent voice to stay the hell away from Geillis as he smells already that she will get in trouble for poisoning her late husband, Claire gets a small note, meant to be written by Geillis and telling her to come as quick as possible, and the next thing Claire does is she goes to Geillis' place in an instant? How dumb is she? Why doesn't she listen to what Jamie said - again?

And what makes this episode even worse for me is the lack in logic. In the end we find out that it was not Geillis but Loaghaire who has sent the note to Claire to lure her into a trap together with Geillis. Fine plot idea that, only that I'd bet my house that in the 18th century, the granddaughter of the castle's female chambermaid and cook (Mrs. Fitzgibbons) certainly didn't visit a school, so she certainly couldn't even write her own name, let alone that kind of note written in the most beautiful and delicate letters. She also wouldn't know anyone of higher stand who could have written the note for her, and even if, she couldn't have done that as then someone else would have known about her foul plan. So I think this was the first episode where there was a real lack of logic and simply a historical inaccuracy as the "simple" folk in the castles simply couldn't write back then.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Sex
snebutler26 June 2020
They have way too much sex on this show. Feel like I'm watching porn.
18 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed