The "Nothing to hide." argument, ie, the only people who want to protect their privacy are those who have something to hide, was first used in a book in 1888, long before video surveillance was invented.
It is considered quite absurd by academics, as it is nonsensical and its basic tenet is that only the guilty are being watched, which has been repeatedly disproven.
It is considered quite absurd by academics, as it is nonsensical and its basic tenet is that only the guilty are being watched, which has been repeatedly disproven.