Incorrectly stated the CPU were fried. Since Pentium 3 Socket 370 Coppermine and AMD 64 Socket 754. They have built in thermal throttling meaning you can pull off the heat sink with it running and have no ill effects or damage to the computer.
Edit:
The "computer" in question is an IBM card reader from 1958 with what looks like a typewriter on top. It wouldn't have had a "CPU" at all. It's unlikely the device would have had any form of active cooling. That is the goof.
The first microprocessor launched 13 years later in 1971, and it would be a further 17 years before Intel introduced thermal throttling to consumer chips.
Edit:
The "computer" in question is an IBM card reader from 1958 with what looks like a typewriter on top. It wouldn't have had a "CPU" at all. It's unlikely the device would have had any form of active cooling. That is the goof.
The first microprocessor launched 13 years later in 1971, and it would be a further 17 years before Intel introduced thermal throttling to consumer chips.
When Booth and Sweets first meet Pelant and he shows them his GPS ankle monitor, the monitor is over his sock. In reality, ankle monitors are not supposed to have anything between the monitor and your skin.
While Angela and Hodgins are solving the puzzle in the vertebrae, Angela reads out the last four digits - 5291. Onscreen the numbers are 5247.
When trying to solve the spine code, Hodgins has the sequence of bones displayed on bottom and on top of that is a sequence of letters that's implied to be what the bone sequence is supposed to translate to, but no explanation is given as to how he determined that sequence. Furthermore, when Angela suggests just looking at the numbers and ignoring the letters of of the spinal column, her program puts the numbers up on the screen in the correct order and then it spontaneously changes to a completely different number sequence with no rhyme or reason and neither of them question it. It isn't simply the numbers in reverse nor is it a simple letters to numbers transposition using the aforementioned sequence Hodgins had up. In other words, they should not have been able to arrive at the conclusion they did the way they did, and if the code actually contains the information from their conclusion at all then a bunch of steps were skipped.