(No big spoilers, maybe a little one if you're looking hard for a clue as to what the episode is about.)
TMI goes for the low-hanging, or rather, short-hanging, fruit. Whether or not you agree with the points of view of the "angry" characters halfway through will probably determine whether or not you like the episode. For example, if you liked "Manbearpig" or "Goobacks", you'll probably dislike "TMI", and if you disliked "The Deathcamp of Tolerance", you'll probably like "TMI".
tsbrownie from United States wrote this about the previous episode (1503): "Hey, maybe it's me, but the last few episodes seem to be re-hashed punch lines and clichés from old shows. Not one guffaw, snort nor belly laugh in the whole show. Not even a chuckle.
They still go for the shock value thing, the parody of race, creed, color and place of national origin, but it's just not getting there."
And it applies to TMI as well.
If you identify with the POV that mocks the "angry" characters, you stand a good chance of enjoying it a lot, but it's not very highbrow ridicule - there's nothing really clever or noteworthy, and there's no "I learned something today" moment to punctuate the joke and give you some intellectual satisfaction. You'll probably enjoy it, but sadly it won't be anything new for you.
If you don't identify with the POV that mocks the "angry" characters, it's probably something that'll shortly make you mad. Or you might take the longer view and see it for what it is - just kind of a series of clichéd gags that have been around for a long, long time. Whether or not they're short or long. It just makes for an entire episode of "neener-neener-neener, you ain't got ____NOT-QUITE A SPOILER_____".
Note that were the political views of most of the "angry characters" reversed, the other half of the audience would stand a good chance of finding it funny - but the jokes would be just as cheap and the wit just as lacking - and then the other half of the audience would dislike it.
The first several minutes of the episode are funny, showcasing Cartman's penchant for overdoing things. Some of the timing through the episode is good, and a few of the non-plot related jokes are pretty sharp. But mostly it's somewhat lackluster.
Overall, you'll probably rate it a 1 or a 10, depending what you think of the characters mocked. Honestly, it doesn't rate either level - it's neither that good nor that bad, as it works on the level of lowest or shortest common denominator (maybe that's part of the equation).
They need to put some more idea balls in the tank, but ever since 200 and 201, their main writers have probably just been floating since there are things they can't write about.
5 out of 46 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink