If this film released 10 years ago it would be a success. Perditibilty is burden for this film audience can perdict each and every scene in this movie. Because film story plot that much cliche.
5 Reviews
Nothing new
kiranvs-025232 April 2021
Average story with poor animation effects
tariqrasheed24 January 2022
There was no proper story. Focus was niether on Tiger nor Villain. You won't get bore until it's end. One time watch if you feel bore. Story is average. Graphics are not upto the mark. Anybody can find what is fake in this movie when we talk about graphics.
CLIMAX WILL CHOKE U TO DEATH
mbsathya-4786518 August 2023
Don't waste time... Sufferable movie.... Zero plot... Average acting....one of the worst climax I have ever ever seen.... Don't watch or watch at your own risk.... I don't know why these films are even made without any proper writing and screenplay.... Absolute shame.....this would have been a good movie if taken in 1940's....the tiger in the movie was irritating us... Poor Cgi..... Poor acting.... Worst poorest direction and screenplay.....just to do anything to become a director... Whoever wrote this story pls don't do another one... Garbage of movie which will waste your lifetime. Watched one time and got irritated as much as possible....
Thriller that not bound you!
goraniteerth-7026623 August 2021
It appears to be an unofficial remake of Burning Bright (2010). The thriller of a man-eating tigress, who is thrown into a deserted guest house, is easy to show in one hour and 26 minutes, but a two-hour film also has to resort to another story. Here too, there is a story of a serial killer who grabbed the property of rich widow women by trapping them, but every scene of the story is familiar, so it does not give the feeling of thriller. For anyone who has watched Burning Bright, the film is useless.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
