Emperor of the North (1973) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
83 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Riding the Rails
rmax30482312 September 2003
This is the kind of story that Tom Wolfe might have written. It's about what he would have called a "status-sphere" and ordinary sociologists would have called a subculture. It's about competition within a limited environment, about acquiring status, about working your way up the ladder of prestige within a particular specialized structure by means of courage, skill, and strategy. Only instead of the wild blue yonder, or landing on the heaving deck of an aircraft carrier, or NASCAR racing, the thing to be conquered here is Ernest Borgnine, the sadistic conductor who chuckles as he throws hobos off his train, sometimes to their deaths, kind of redoing his Fatso Judson number, so evil that if he did not exist it would be necessary to prevent him.

It's a classical subculture in that it has all the features of a closed world with its own values. Everyone seems to know everyone else. And, as in most subcultures, including those that used to be called "primitive societies," the initiate is given a new name. In other movies exploring such subcultures they may have names like "Fast Eddy," "Minnesota Fats," "Maverick," "Dragstrip," "Charlie the Gent." Here they have names like "A Number 1" (Lee Marvin), "Cigaret" (Keith Carradine), and "Shack" (Borgnine). They even had their own written language, a set of pictographs scratched into rocks or written in dirt, conveying messages like, "This family good for a free meal," or , "Work for a meal," or, "Stay away. Cops." There were small communities of hobos, often carved out of track-side garbage dumps.

Interesting cast, by the way, a lot of familiar faces in bit parts -- Simon Oakland, Elija Cook Jr.

Makeup and Wardrobe Departments have done a fine job of turning them into 'Bos. They don't look Hollywood dirty, with a few smears of mud. They just look dirty. Their clothing is filthy. All in all, a good delousing looks called for. Marvin's face, by the time this was released, looked just beat-up enough, and from life, not booze. And check out his decaying lower incisors.

The plot has to do with a duel of wits between Marvin, who is determined to demonstrate his skill at the top of the status ziggurat by riding Borgnine's train to Porland, OR. Borgnine, much to the puzzlement of the rest of the train crew, is obsessed with keeping his freight train clean of hitch-hikers. He's fiendishly clever in smoking out and hurting riders. Carradine is the kind of youth often called "callow." He brags a lot and is brave but, alas, is unable to absorb the rules of the game because he plays for reasons of self aggrandizement, not for the team. He winds up in the drink.

There's something else about this movie that may keep a viewer interested. It takes place during the depression. The trains are slow, fed by coal, and powered by steam. They rock back and forth gently, as if trying to put a passenger or a stowaway to sleep. And they travel through a sunny evergreen wilderness in the Northwest. It's the kind of scenic journey you now have to pay for if you want to make a round trip to San Juan, CO. What was in the 1930s essential to a certain kind of existence has now been vulgarized and turned into a tourist's delight.

It's a small story about small people. There is nothing epic about it. The score seems to owe something to Burt Bacharach, who was so successful a few years earlier with "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid." And, for my taste, there are one or two too many choker close-ups filling the screen with monstrous teeth and sweaty flesh. But it's hard to ignore the movie. You'll probably want to find out what happens next.
41 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sadistic yard bull takes on the King of the Road
helpless_dancer20 February 2002
Ernest Borgnine was superb as the murderous railroad agent intent on keeping a legendary hobo off his train. Lee Marvin gave one of his best performances as A#1, the hobo's hobo, who is equally set on riding the rails on Borgnine's unrideable #19. Keith Carradine almost stole the show as a useless, me first punk out to prove his manhood in the harsh hobo camps. Very realistic looking sets and the entire film captured the flavor of the depression era perfectly. 4 stars.
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Boxcar Willies
telegonus8 May 2002
For you teenagers out there, or parents of teenagers who have expressed a desire to run away from home and ride the rails, this movie is the perfect antidote. Anyone who sees this film you will never even consider hopping on a boxcar again. Directed by Robert Aldrich, and bearing his unmistakable anarchist's stamp, it tells the story of two hoboes, one, A-1, played by Lee Marvin, a seasoned, lone wolf, and the other, Cigaret (Keith Carradine), a young boaster who tags along for the rides, and forever tries to convince his friend and mentor that he is in the same league with him in the art of hobodom, and maybe even better. The story revolves around the attempt of both men to ride the Number 19, a train lorded over by vicious railroadman Shack (Ernest Borgnine), who is known for despising hoboes, and for attacking them with hammer and chains! Director Robert Aldrich works wonders with this tall tale, some of it based on true stories. His fondness for improbable material is evident here, as once again he shows himself fascinated by the seemingly impossible task. Aldrich has a real feeling for what one might call WASP schmaltz, and he pours it on like ketchup on a Big Mac. He obviously loves railraods, old railroad uniforms, tramps, the Pacific Northwest, junkyards and the great outdoors generally, all copiously present here, aided in no small measure by Joe Biroc's lyrical photography.

The Emperor Of the North Pole is more character study than story. Marvin's character of A-1 is independent, shrewd and ethically minded, with a great sense of style. For him, being a hobo is almost a calling, and his acceptance by his fellow tramps constitutes a kind of knighthood, a status he guards jeaously. His opposite number, Shack, is a sadistic company man who relishes lording over others with a big stick, sometimes literally. To call him a type A personality would be a gross understatement. Unlike A-1, Shack has no sense of style; indeed, he doesn't even seem to own his personality. The railroad does. Cigaret is a kid, with a big ego and even bigger mouth who loves to tell stories about his exploits, none of them true. He fools no one, least of all A-1, who tries to teach him a thing or two, with only middling success. The clashing of these three personalities constitutes the bulk of the film, and is basically what it is about.

I sense that Aldrich, and screenwriter Christopher Knopf, were aiming for a larger than life effect, and that they were trying to create a sort of Great American Myth, like Paul Bunyan or Johnny Appleseed. They only partially succeed at this. Though Knopf's dialogue is at times excellent, the movie's realism works against its mythic qualities, and there's too much swearing. There's too much of a weary, real life-battered aspect to the characters for them to rise to iconic stature. Also, Cigaret's volubility is often obnoxious, and he seems to be saying the same things, again and again; and though Carradine plays him well enough, he comes across as too middle class and at times too delicate for the role. The action scenes on the other hand, are brilliantly done, and the climactic fight at the end is well worth the wait.
31 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the great unsung films of the 1970's
Cru322 May 1999
Robert Aldrich was one of the most interesting American directors of the last 40 years. He moved with relative ease between genres and told his stories in a direct, honest style. This film is one of the unsung gems of the seventies, part adventure film, part social drama, part road movie.

Set during the depression when riding the rails was a way of life for desperate men (and women), the film follows three characters - Lee Marvin, as Number One, a legend among the grizzled hobos congregating along the rail lines; Ernest Borgnine as Shack, the sadistic conductor perfectly willing to do whatever necessary to keep free loaders off his trains; and a young Keith Carradine as Two-Bit, a novice full of bluster and false bravado out to make a name for himself. Marvin takes the kid under his wing; their relationship is part adversarial, as the weary elder tries to educate the fool how to survive on the line. Looming in the background is Borgnine, out to do his job at any cost. Ultimately a wager is made, and Marvin will put his life on the line to best Borgnine and show he is the Emperor of the North.

At times it's a very brutal film - the final confrontation between Marvin & Borgnine is one of the toughest, nastiest fights ever photographed - but it is splendidly made and endlessly fascinating.
59 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Polar Express, it ain't!
ptb-82 March 2005
There were just so many great B movies made in the 70s and this is one of the best. Stark and cruel but completely watchable and with two excellent male leads, this brutal hobo railroad drama remains fixed in most viewers minds forever. It is also part of two great sub genres...the depression years drama and the railroad thriller. So many films to choose from in either genre and practically all watchable and enjoyable. EMPEROR was released for about 10 days and never surfaced again. I used to add it in as a double feature in my cinema right up until about 1980 and it always commanded major discovery status. The problem is the title: and like DAY OF THE LOCUST or EMPIRE OF THE SUN or other confusing titles the pubic never found it themselves. It failed on first release and was only repeatedly discovered when the public went to a double feature as described above. In Oz it was released only as EMPEROR OF THE NORTH. You could almost mix'n'match films in those days; THE STREETFIGHTER, BUSTER AND BILLIE, THE SPIKES GANG, FROM NOON TILL THREE, WHATS THE MATTER WITH HELEN, BLOODY MAMA, all interchangeable in any programme. Others here can tell you the story, but I will tell you to find it yourself and have a major discovery film enter your library.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Love trains? See this movie!
tdemos9 July 2006
The 1970's were known for gritty, sometimes violent movies about cops and criminals (You may remember classics like Serpico, The French Connection, Dog Day Afternoon, the 7 Ups, The Dirty Harry movies). There were a few exceptions dealing with depression-era subjects (Bonnie & Clyde, The Last Picture Show, Paper Moon, Days of Heaven) and this mostly unknown and unsung masterpiece with the confusing title.

I was just a teenager when this movie was released in theatres. (There were no DVD's or VHS home releases back then). I caught just a few brief commercial promos on TV advertising "Emperor of the North Pole" and from that moment, I was hooked and had to see it. Then, in the flash of a weekend passing it was gone, yanked from the schedule at the local theatre. Perhaps it was considered too brutish in its violence or perhaps the misleading title "Emperor of the North Pole" kept audiences out of the theatre. There was further confusion for years afterwards when the reissue title came out as "Emperor of the North".

I never did get to see it way back when, but it stayed in my memory and thankfully in the era of satellite dishes and 24 hour movie channels, it lives again for the world to see in all its glory.

For those who love steam engine trains, this movie, (along with "The Train" and "Danger Lights") is an absolute must see. Director Robert Aldrich having completed the acclaimed and commercially successful "The Dirty Dozen" just 6 years earlier had the resources, the artistic courage, and the benefit of working with two veteran Dirty Dozen actors (Lee Marvin & Ernest Borgnine)who just lock-on to their respective characters with perfection.

The casting of this movie, (especially the minor roles of all the bo's and the railroad men) is superb. The cinematography is also fantastic and not only captures the beauty of Oregon, but a sense of the time and place of a depression-era story. Even the changing Oregon weather (alternating rainy-foggy days, with bright sunshine, is depicted accurately). The viewer can actually feel the cold of the soaking rain as the two hobos ride the passenger car. The frequent violence is brutal but a necessary part of the tale.

As for the story itself, the hobo's speak their own language in a kind of closed-society lyrical tongue that seems to be partially inspired by the depression era paintings of Thomas Hart Benton. It's not Shakespeare, but half the fun is trying to figure out what they are saying.

The music track, although it mostly works for the movie, seems oddly out-of-place with the period depicted, as it has a definite 1960's elevator-beautiful music component, at times. Not that this takes away anything from the movie, however. Similar, out-of-the-era music exists in great movies like, The Sting, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and Ryan's Daughter.

Even the effects soundtrack is a masterpiece of tight editing that greatly adds to the enjoyment of the movie. Listen to the whistle blowing of the opposing "mail train" slowly growing in intensity during the scene where the two trains are highballing it to a full head-on crash. Certainly one of the most frightening moments of any "train" picture. This is film-making at its best.

Also appreciated... a subtle moment when a passenger train is pulling into the station and the viewer hears (but does not see) what might be typical comments from the passengers from a 1930's-era train. "The train only stops for a few minutes"..."I think I'll buy a newspaper", etc.

Emperor of the North Pole is great movie and an absolute must see if you are a fan of vintage railroading, Lee Marvin, Ernest Borgnine, Robert Aldrich, or Keith Carradine. You won't be disappointed!
42 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hobos vs Conductor
ktowny17 August 2012
I saw this at the famous Genesee in Waukegan, IL when I was a wee lad and its had a mystical allure ever since. Maybe because as a wee lad, a movie about hobos riding the rails is an off-kilter idea. It kind of stuck with me and I've always wanted to see it again but never got around to it. Then lo and behold it was on AMC or TMC a few weekends ago. No boy was all extra happy was he. However, this time it was a bit of a let down.

The story follows two hobos, A-No 1 (Marvin) and a rookie (Carradine) who are trying to ride a mean conductor's (Borginine) train to Portland. The conductor, named Shack, is renowned among rail riding hobos as the meanest SOB there is and has no qualms about murdering the freeloader if he has to. He uses various weapons to keep the hobos off his train, some of which are quite ingenious, like tying a window weight to a rope and feed it under the car to bounce off the ties and pummel a man who is riding under a box car. Plot wise, there isn't much to the movie. Just the three guys playing cat and mouse on the train and meeting all sorts of hobo folk along the way. What makes this movie worth checking out is seeing Borginine busting a blue vein when he gets ticked off. He turns from an old grump to a ornery old cuss bent on destruction. Gotta love it.

One thing that struck me, and I'm not sure what it is about movies made in the 70s and set in the 30s, but the 1930s catch phrases sound very awkward coming out of the actors mouths. This is also the case if you listen to some of the dialogue in The Sting. Anyway, taken as a whole, this one is mildly entertaining with a few worthwhile scenes but nothing to rave about.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A terrific allegorical Depression-era period action yarn doozy
Woodyanders17 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Nothing gets my blood a boilin' somethin' hot more than watching a rugged, brutal, mighty manly man adventure yarn done with plenty of grit, style, and insight. This truly terrific allegorical Depression-era period action doozy concerning the legendary, almost mythical rivalry between train-jumping hobos and the railwaymen who went out of their way to keep these lowly bums in their bottom-rung-of-the-socioeconomic-ladder-place most definitely fits that particular bill with astonishing deftness.

Lee Marvin rules the day with his customary effortless virile charm and cool, dry humor as A#1, the greatest of all train-hopping hobos who's rightfully revered as a god by his fellow dingy derelicts. Keith Carradine likewise holds his own as Cigarette, the brash punk tyro kid who Marvin teaches the basic hobo ropes to. Ernest Borgnine delivers a fierce, growly, volcanically hostile and quite intimidating portrayal of cruel, callous, "screw with me buster and I'll wipe the floor with your face" stomp-ass villainy as the Shack, an exceptionally mean and ferocious train conductor who would just love to clean A#1's clock but good. A#1 vows to do the seemingly impossible by riding the Shack's train all the way to Portland and living to tell the tale.

The always on-target, sorely missed Robert Aldrich directs this engrossing story with his trademark tautly wound, very blunt and forceful sinewy élan. Christopher Knopf's meaty, deep-diggin' script offers a fascinating examination of man's desire to amount to something in life regardless of the station he holds, how status has to be earned (here given a compelling old guard vs. the new generation spin thanks to the teacher and student relationship between Marvin and Carradine), the need for achievement, and the harsh victimization of the poor by the working class. Joseph Biroc's sharp cinematography gives the lush, verdant Oregon wilderness a lovely autumnal look. The fabulous supporting cast reads like a veritable who's who of 70's character actors: Charles Tyner, Matt Clark, Harry Caesar, Elisha Cook, Jr., Simon Oakland, Vic Tayback, Sid Haig, and even Lance Henrikson in a "blink and you'll miss him" uncredited bit part as a railroad worker. Marty Robbins heartily belts out the stupendously rousing theme song. And the final literal duel of the titans fight between Marvin and Borgnine -- these two really get down and dance a bloody boogie, tearing pieces out of each other's hides with chains, hammers, their own feet and bare hands, and even an enormous ax -- rates as the authentic gnarly article. It's without a doubt the greatest two ugly actors making themselves uglier in a very ugly knock-down, drag-out savage smack-down every filmed -- and an immensely satisfying conclusion to this simply sensational movie.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Violent film set in the Great Depression in which a pair of two-fisted characters confront deadly on a train
ma-cortes5 May 2012
Very good picture and efficiently made by Robert Aldrich ; however , this was originally a project for Sam Peckinpah . The title ¨ Emperor of the North¨ refers to a joke among hobos during the Great Depression that the world's best hobo was Emperor of the North Pole, a way of poking fun at their own desperate situation since somebody ruling over the North Pole would be ruling over a wasteland . This film was made and originally released as "Emperor of the North Pole" after initial screenings , Twentieth Century Fox executives feared that audiences might think the title indicated a Christmas movie or an Arctic exploration story and so shortened the title to "Emperor of the North" . 1933 during the height of great depression in the US, and the land is full of people who are now homeless . Driven to desperation by the economic depression of 1930s America , a subculture of hobos hopped freight trains to get from place to place in search of jobs , handouts, or even to take it easy sometimes . Those people, commonly called "hobos", are truly hated by Shack (Ernest Borgnine), a sadistical railway conductor who announces he will kill any tramp who attempts to cop his train and swore that no hobo will ride his locomotive for free . Well, no-one but the legendary Number One (Lee Marvin) and a young hobo named Cigaret (Keith Carradine's character Cigaret is named after the moniker that Jack London adopted on the road) are ready to put their lives at wager to become national legends , as the first persons who survived the trip on Shack's known train .

Tough hobo Lee Marvin & sadistic conductor Ernest Borgnine meet in the fight of the century , both of whom give excellent performances . Emperor of the North Pole depicts a microcosm of this subculture set in Oregon, and actually used the Oregon, Pacific & Eastern railroad which was taken up in 1994 like so much other trackage around the country. Thus, this motion picture serves as not only a look into an important aspect of American history, but into a specific piece of it in the Pacific Northwest . Interesting and tense screenplay is based in part on the books 'The Road' by Jack London and 'From Coast to Coast with Jack London' . It was Robert Aldrich's intention that the characters played by Ernest Borgnine, Lee Marvin and Keith Carradine represented the Establishment, the Anti-Establishment and the Youth of Today respectively . Nice cinematography by Joseph Biroc reflecting appropriately the 3os and Great Depression , being stunningly filmed in Oregon. Lively and evocative musical score by Frank De Vol , Aldrich's usual, including a wonderful song by Marty Robbins .

Martin Ritt was originally slated to direct but was fired from the production , then Sam Peckinpah was approached next but he couldn't agree with the producers on money. The project was then offered to, and accepted by, Robert Aldrich who gave a tense and brilliant direction . Aldrich began writing and directing for TV series in the early 1950s, and directed his first feature in 1953 (Big Leaguer ,1953). Soon thereafter he established his own production company and produced most of his own films, collaborating in the writing of many of them . Directed in a considerable plethora of genres but almost all of his films contained a subversive undertone . He was an expert on warlike (Dirty Dozen , The Angry Hills , Attack , Ten seconds to hell) and Western (The Frisko kid , Ulzana's raid, Apache , Veracruz , The last sunset) . Raing : Above average , it's a must see and a standout in its genre
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best movies ...
wmjahn13 December 2006
... of the 70ies and one of the best movies of all the people involved in this project! Originally a project of Sam Peckinpah, it was then directed by director Bob ALDRICH, an equal to Sam, but not yet having gained the reputation he deserves. While Sam did much fewer movies than Robert and was a director, who was difficult to handle (a real GENIUS!), Aldrich was easier to handle and did movies, which were less controversial, in other words: not as brutal as Sams. But that doesn't make him any less good director. He has a distinct style and the same appreciation for great tough dramas, just check out ULZANA'S RAID, for example.

EMPEROR is probably his best movie, simply a must-see. I watched this the first time when I was a teenager and this did run in late-night TV (of course, being still pretty brutal, this is nothing for prime-time, ha ha). I Liked the German title "EIN ZUG FÜR ZWEI HALUNKEN", but being less movie-educated 2 decades ago than I am today, I didn't expect much and just gave it a try. It was just AWESOME, I was so thrilled, that from that day I took all efforts needed to see as many from Aldrich's movies (and lee Marvin's, of course) as possible.

MARVIN and BORGNINE play the roles of their lives and are possible the best imaginable actors for these roles (although at the time the movie was made, you had a lot of great tough guys to choose from, while today you'd have real troubles finding any actors, who could believable play these roles - they're all weepies now), the script is tough and intelligent and although the movie runs for nearly 2 hours, it's never boring. When no action takes place (and no movie needs to have only action-scenes, that gets boring within a quarter hour, just try THE ROCK to see how it should NOT be done), you have superb photography (I agree with the guy describing this one as one of the best-photographed movies of all time) and clever dialogue, pretty philosophical at times. The scenery is breathtaking, the battles tough and brutal (and short: violence is usually an eruption, which happens fast and doesn't take long), the story great and the actors perfect! What more could one ask for?? A real winner all the way!

Such a pity that directors like Peckinpah and ALDRICH are not among as anymore and today's movies can't hold up with such masterpieces, because they're mostly overpriced "blockbuster"-sh**, which try to appeal to everyone (to cover their 50 to 100 million $ production budget) and therefore have no real style and because today's directors simply can't do it as well as their ancestors could direct (with 1 or 2 exceptions, maybe).

Check this out, you won't be disappointed!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It should have been great
pmtelefon11 April 2020
"Emperor of the North" has all the ingredients to be a great movie. It has a good premise, a great cast and good look. This movie has more than a few great moments but, overall, it misses the mark. The biggest problem in this movie, as much as I love him, is Ernest Borgnine. Borgnine is one of the greats. He could play good guys just as well as he played bad guys. Unfortunately, under the direction of the often overpraised Robert Aldrich, Borgnine is not allowed to play a character. He plays a screaming, glaring bear, an ogre. As a result, Borgnine's character isn't that interesting a villain. Much of the rest of the cast has a nice moment or two. The always reliable Borgnine doesn't have any, not really. It's a shame. "Emperor of the North" is a watchable, almost enjoyable, near miss.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hard Times Breeds Hard Men
bkoganbing6 November 2009
When TCM was showing films concerning The Great Depression last month, I'm still wondering how this one didn't rate a viewing. Emperor Of The North Pole concerned people at the very bottom of the economic scale, the jobless hobos of which the Bible admonishes that the poor will always be with us. Just in those years they increased exponentially in the USA and around the World.

They always seem to create their own societal pecking order, look at the Prince And The Pauper which records a society of the poor and the outlaw of which there wasn't much of a dividing line in Tudor England. Things haven't changed much in 400 years. In this society Lee Marvin is A-No.1, he's earned that by challenging all the train bosses for his right to thumb a ride on any train going anywhere in the 48 states.

Years ago I remember reading a biography of Jack Dempsey who in his youth was a hobo like Marvin, probably one about Keith Carradine's age who rode the rails as you see Carradine and Marvin do. You met all kinds of conductors, some as mean as Ernest Borgnine, some who let you 'ride the rods' as you see how Marvin and Carradine ride on the underbelly of the train holding on to those control rods. Some really nice ones actually would let you ride in the comfort of a freezing freight car.

But there's none as mean as Ernest Borgnine, the conductor known as Shack who boasts no one rides his train for free. He's not satisfied with just throwing them off after some roughing up. This film opens with him killing a hobo with a hammer he carries for the job and then throwing him off the train. Who's to know it's a homicide and who'll care if forensics would prove it?

Is Marvin up to the challenge however both from Borgnine and from young Carradine who thinks he's tough enough to live in the hobo camps and ride the rails as well?

For that you have to watch Emperor Of The North Pole. It's a fine depiction of life at the lowest levels in the Depression. Though Marvin does a fine job, I wonder if this film had been offered to Robert Mitchum? He was a Hollywood star who actually did live this existence in his late teens and early twenties. I really think Mitchum could have brought something special to A-No.1 that no other star could have.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Emperor of the North
henry8-316 April 2021
In the depression, Marvin plays the no 1 hobo who rides across the country jumping on and off trains looking for work. Borgnine is a train guard who will happily kill anyone trying to travel on his train - a competition develops with odds being laid that Marvin can stay on Borgnine's train to Portland. Cocky kid Carradine sticks with Marvin hoping to inherit his crown.

Aldrich is good at this mixture of action, passion and comedy and this is certainly a film with a bit of a difference and no little excitement with some good action set pieces. Borgnine is wonderful as the vile Shack whilst Marvin's A no.1 is perhaps more typical Marvin - tough guy with a twinkle in his eye. You do sort of wonder why they both risk so much for so little - something to do I guess - and there are way too many soulful speeches in this, notably from Marvin, but it remains a fun couple of hours.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ride on
Prismark1016 August 2016
Emperor Of The North Pole is directed by Robert Aldrich. It is tough violent film set in the depression era Pacific Northwest railroads and concerns hobos hitching a free ride on the trains and the railway guards fighting them off.

One rail guard is Shack (Ernest Borgnine) he is a mean one and will kill any hobo who rides on his train and he enjoys it. Lee Marvin is the hobo who is determined to ride Shack's train and this leads to a clash of these two alpha males and two Oscar winning actors.

Along for the ride is Keith Carradine as the young hobo who also gets involved in a tussle with Marvin and Borgnine. Carradine's character is a bit dim and gets in Marvin's way as well as being shifty and untrustworthy when he should be a protégé of Marvin.

The film ends with a violent showdown between Borgnine and Marvin but the film does come across as confused as the relationship between Carradine and Marvin is never developed. Were they supposed to be uneasy allies or enemies as in the key final fight he is just a spectator.

The film is filled with the depression period atmosphere and it is a muscular film, interesting and novel but I expected something with more substance from Aldrich such as a more shaded villain from Borgnine, his Shack is so disliked that other rail workers were hoping Marvin would successfully ride his train.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is a man's movie: ugly, violent, and pessimistic...it's great!
bregund21 October 2004
This movie scared the hell out of me when I was little, mostly because I'd never seen an evil Ernest Borgnine. With his fierce eyes, maniacal laugh, and drop-forged fists, he commands every scene with a demonic self-assurance. You have to see this movie just to see Borgnine, he's perfect as the railway conductor. He's like a violent gorilla in a conductor suit. Lee Marvin as Number One mumbles his way through the movie with an impressive vocabulary and intelligence that belies his appearance. He wanders about waxing philosophical about the state of the world, the battle between good and evil, and his place in the grand scheme of things. Keith Carradine wouldn't have been my choice for the role of the young kid, he just wasn't very convincing and some of his lines come off a bit forced and awkward. One of the other reviewers mentioned the photography, and I'm left wondering how they got some of the shots, especially considering the movie was made thirty years ago with gigantic, bulky cameras. There are scenes where the train is way out in the middle of nowhere and the camera is actually pacing the train and the action that happens on it; great photography. This is a very good film and worthy of all the praise it gets from the other reviews.
96 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I love this screwy movie.
laurelhardy-1226831 January 2023
Aldrich did this film. And it's really pretty darned good.

I'm a train guy, riding them, and building two layouts even today to accent the mega 150 sq ft Xmas village the wife spends a month putting up. Replete with operating carnival rides, electric cars, 135 village pieces. A very active set up. Not static.

But the trains are awesome. It's fun being a kid at nearly 70, and using the excuse it's for the grandkids.

Saw this flick at the drive-in when I was 19. Hadn't seen it anywhere ever since it came out. So, a couple years ago, I found a new, affordable DVD and bought it on Amazon. Great pic quality too.

The locations are glorious. We retired to Grants Pass Oregon about 11 years ago, and sure enough, this movie was shot right North of us in Cottage Grove OR, same RR used by Buster Keaton in 'The General' so very long ago. Anyway, it's filled with lakes, rivers, stream, wildlife and endless flowers and flora here, and you'll see some of that virgin beauty in this film.

The other reviews spell out the plot in great detail (collectively.).

Borgnine? They paint him as mean and sadistic as a man gets. Lee Marvin (for me), makes the film. He's A#1: The most successful of all hoboes when it comes to hitching rides on trains. Particularly if it's Borgnine's, who regularly bludgeons hoboes with hammers and chains, knocking them senseless as they ultimately fall under the train, where many are cut in 1/2.

It's a bit hokey sure, but what the hell. Marvin is to train-riding hoboes; what Bronson was to bare fisted boxing in "Hard Times" (a great, even far superior flick!)

It's kinda of a guy flick but my wife of a million years is still a Tomboy and she likes it ok.

So that's it. If it's not your bag, if nothing else, the scenery is gorgeous.

Thx

Bob R.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Minor Aldrich but with much to recommend it.
MOscarbradley6 June 2017
Ernest Borgnine is the meanest sonofabitch on the railroad and Lee Marvin is the hobo who gives him a hard time riding the rails. The period is the Depression when hobos rode the rails with impunity and it was up to hard-as-nails guys like Ernest to stop them. Robert Aldrich's "Emperor of the North" is one of his male-orientated pictures, displaying a good deal of his signature brutality and while it's a minor work in the Aldrich canon it has much to recommend it; here it's the duel to the death between Marvin and Borgnine who makes for a truly nasty villain and is just one of the reasons why this is such a ridiculously entertaining picture. Nice work too from a young Keith Carradine as a fellow hobo with aspirations to take Marvin's crown as 'Emperor of the North'.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Explorations into an unknown subculture.
Skeptic4597 February 2005
Emperor of the North is a very strange film. Strange because it covers a subculture that I certainly had no idea existed. Hoboes who ride trains and challenge each to become the king of the train routes. Lee Marvin is of course the hero, A No 1, the ultimate bum. Why the position of A No 1 is coveted for is quite obscure. However, in the harsh 1930's, I guess any title is better than none.

The film introduces the viewer to an entirely different world. A world that has come crashing down. This is shown when Marvin is sitting in a dump. Suggesting that the world has fallen apart. The dog-eat-dog nature of the 30's is also suggested by Marvins fight with three youths. Yes Marvin can fight three guys armed only with a chicken. The ultimate hard man.

Although Marvin is very good in the picture. It is actually Ernest Borgnine who steals the show. He plays the malevolent Shack with a psychopathic gleam in his eyes. In fact, in the first five minutes he has killed some poor guy who happened to stow away on his train. He also has some very creative ways of the torturing poor hoboe train riders. This is a guy who is actually disappointed when the hoboes are not burnt to death on his train! Like a demented cave troll, he lugs around a hammer living to gruesomely maim and graphically kill. Yes Borgnine makes a great villain.

Although made in 1973, the film has a kind of 60's mentality about it. Borgnine could easily be seen as representing 'the man.' He is industrial culture, cruelly riding over people and their lives. The 20's were the introduction of the Fordian industrial production line. This film kind of shows the extension of this into an alienation of people. Are not hoboes the most dehumanised people that exist in any society? A No 1 represents the human side of things. How his creative flair, innovative spirit and dogged determination have him ultimately winning against the system. In fact, Cigaret is thrown from the train for not having 'heart.' This is obviously the crucial factor of being human.

The idea of 'beating the man' is a theme further shown when A No 1 steals a chicken. The cop that chases him is driven away by a group of hoboes. What is interesting about this scene is the idea of people coming together about challenging authority. This hints at a vaguely Marxist underpinning.

The film although an interesting watch is quite slow. Plus you can only get so excited by people hiding on a train. But the real fascination here lies in the exposed subcultures. If you did not know anything about hoboes in the 1930's, you will after watching this film. This would actually be a great film for those studying sociology.

There is a kind of existential angst about the film. That is people thrown into circumstances and constrained by powerful forces outside their control. Borgnine is doing his job, Marvin is trying to survive. The two of them symbolise two great machinations that will ultimately clash. Isn't this the story of the 1930's, where human life and welfare was placed below economics?

This is a good film. In writing this review, I have actually realised there is a lot more to this film than I had originally thought.There is a very strong subtext running underneath. This is much more than just an action film with some big stars. It is a mostly well acted, interesting time capsule. If you can find it, then most definitely watch it. I'll give it a 7 out of 10.

Also kudos to Ruthless Reviews for reviewing this movie on their site. Otherwise I would never have known it existed.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great news for fans of this film!
A-No. 112 May 1999
I just discovered this site. For James Barron, tbates, Jack Franklin, and Jason Gore, "The Emperor of the North" is indeed available for sale from the Railroad Museum in Sacramento, CA. I picked up a copy this year, after years ago obtaining one directly from a friend at 20th Century Fox. Happily, they are the same, and not chopped up version we see on TV.

I first saw this film in South Africa in '73 or '74, when they had no TV down there, and watched it in a theater for 6 straight nights because I liked it so much.

tbates, there are several female faces (the girl getting baptized in the river, and the lady shaving in the passenger car) ... James Gore, one "slip-up" is when the charging fast mail passenger train roars down the track toward the 19, which barely makes it onto a siding, yet nobody threw the switch back for the oncoming train to go straight through! It should have derailed at once.

Truly a great film, and I hope you guys find it in Sacramento. All the best to you.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pulls no punches
Leofwine_draca6 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A nice little adventure film from a great era of such productions. This one basically tells the story of three figures, each of them representing a different part of society. Ernest Borgnine is the villain of the piece (and excellent with it too), representing government and restriction; Lee Marvin is the hobo hero who just wants a literal free ride, while Keith Carradine is the brash kid looking to make his mark in the world. The plot is simple but in Aldrich's hands the depth is there and the cinematography is decent too. Train films are naturally exciting to my mind and this one's no exception, with great high-speed action sequences and a violent climax that doesn't let up. Good stuff.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent and exciting and well photographed.
jmvpoulsen12 April 2017
In the description of the technical specs IMDb lists it as being in 1:85. That is incorrect it is In 2:35 Panavision. I own the DVD and it is Anamorphic widescreen. I also recently saw it on the Fox Movie Channel and it was presented in 2:35 widescreen. Great Oregon locations and Acting especially by Lee Marvin and Ernest Borgnine and a very young Keith Carradine.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A minor classic
JasparLamarCrabb5 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A film that alternates between comedy and social statement and brutal actioner. In 1933, Lee Marvin is a hobo riding the rails in the Pacific northwest. When he attempts to ride the train of psychotic conductor Ernest Borgnine, an all-out battle ensues. Marvin is excellent in a role that features, at least at first, very little dialog. Borgnine, who never shuts up, is every inch his equal. The film is full of colorful characters, breathtaking scenery and a final quarter that is extremely exciting. Director Robert Aldrich, aided by some excellent Joseph Biroc cinematography and a rip roaring score (by Fank De Vol), creates a minor classic. The supporting cast includes Aldrich regulars Dave Willock & Harry Caesar, as well as Keith Carradine as a young loose cannon who Marvin reluctantly agrees to mentor.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Action-packed greatness
Gloede_The_Saint18 June 2010
Action-packed suspense film that you just have to see. This has everything, suspense, humor, good characters, cool acting, great dialogue, sweet ass directing and a touch of emotion and realism, while it is also somewhat "over-the-top". A really rough and cool movie that can be seen with the gang.

USA 1930's, the depression is roaming the country. Bums however get by just fine. They hang around the railroad were they take the train they want, when and where they want. But nobody rides on the 19.. Shack(Ernest Borgnine) is the boss there and he has decided never to let anyone bum a ride from him. Those who try are usually not seen alive again. He can basically be compared with the devil. Everyone are afraid of him and everyone hates him, no matter what side they are on.

A No. 1(Lee Marvin) is the legendary bum who will challenge him, but he is not alone. An amoral brat of adult age who likes to call himself "Old Cigar"(Keith Carradine) wants to be bum no. 1, "The Emperor of the North Pole." So they have thrown together three damn cool actors and one of the toughest direction of the time, Robert Aldrich (The Dirty Dozen, What Ever Happened Baby Jane two?, The Longest Yard, etc.). That this is two friggin' entertaining hours is obvious.

More than any other quality this film possess is that it's just so bleeding cool. There are so many scenes that made me laugh out so loud that I was afraid that the neighbors would come knocking on my door. The atmosphere is just so bloody sweet. The only weaknesses would be that it doesn't go too deep nor take the time to slow down for finer details. But hell, why should every film do that? I recommend this on the highest!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Borgnine vs Marvin in an axe fight on a train count me in
ThreeGuysOneMovie16 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Set on the rails in the northwest during the great depression Emperor of the North is on the surface a tale of hobos and trains. Marvin portrays A No. 1 reigning king of the Hobos. His counterpoint is Borgnine, as Shack the sadistic train conductor. Rounding out the cast is Carradine as Cigaret a young up start hobo trying to make a name for himself on the rails.

We get a glimpse of what Makes Shack tick in one of the opening scenes of the film after her brains a hobo with a hammer when he catches him riding for free on his train. His maniacal grin as the nameless hobo is crushed under the train is worth the price of admission.

A No. 1 posts for all to see that he is going to ride the #19, Shacks train on the water tower at the station. No one has ridden the train without paying and lived to tell the tale. Brash new comer Cigaret wants to claim the crown as top Hobo and announces his plan to ride the train as well. A No. 1 views Cigaret as a poser and braggart but eventually attempts to teach him the secrets of being a successful hobo and give him some life lessons.

The rest of the film focuses upon the conflict between these three men upon the #19 train. The climactic battle between Shack and A No. 1 that concludes the film is amazing. Picture if you will a battle involving two by fours, chains, a hammer and an Axe upon a moving train.

The cinematography in the film is top notch. They really managed to capture the spirit of being on a steam engine chugging down the line. If you have a thing for trains this is sure to be right up your alley. Similarly the costumes and set pieces certainly seem like authentic depression era garb and equipment. The film evokes thoughts of black and white depression era pictures of work camps and unemployment lines.

Additionally the themes of class and generational warfare permeate the film. It seems as if the film is attempting to get the audience to examine their own perceptions of other classes of people and their interactions with them. The film is set in a time of great upheaval in America when destitute masses searched for food, work and hope along the roads and rails in America. The hero A. No. 1 manages to keep his humanity, humor and sense of purpose despite the state he finds himself in.

This film is defiantly worth checking out it may remind you a bit of a Peckinpah film. He was actually in negotiations to direct the film until money and control problems derailed the project. Aldrich does an admirable job in his own right at the helm making this a film worth viewing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Shack Attack
sgilbert-4188221 August 2021
Ultimately an average film from the early 70s with the feel of a TV movie, and a musical score seemingly stolen from The Waltons, but in Aldrich's hands it tries to rise above. Probably the most evil character Borgnine ever played, eclipsing Fatso "From Here to Eternity", and Coley Trimble in "Bad Day at Black Rock". He'd come a long way since playing Marty Piletti in 1955.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed