- Sent an open letter to director Judd Apatow in 2012 pointing out that Apatow using CGI "nudity" in This is 40 (2012) is a bad idea, stating, "to encourage a whole new generation of gorgeous gals to cover up with this post-production sham is a shame" and that it "could usher in a whole new era of fake nudes."
- [nudity in horror films] I am above all a nudity fan and horror is the number-one genre for nudity. Thus, that makes me a horror fanatic.
- [on too much nudity in films] There is NO such thing as too much nudity.
- The simple fact is that, on the big screen, we have been and will likely continue to see less nudity. With home video, it's simply not the draw it once was when it comes to getting people into theaters. There are exceptions, of course, Piranha 3D being a big one. But on video, where you can really, deeply, and skintimately enjoy a nude scene, I think horror movies will continue to be the vanguard of nudity, offering more nakedness in terms of both quantity and inventive quality as we go forward.
- [defining nudity] And for the record, I define "nudity" per se, as the visibility of one or combination of the following body parts: nipples, butt-crack, pubic hair, labia and/or anus. A butt in a thong is NOT a naked butt. And online there will be a lot of claims of topless photos where the chick is covering her nipples. That is NOT topless.
- [nudity in horror films] The reason there's so much skin in horror movies is because when you're naked you're automatically vulnerable. And when you're a hot naked chick and you throw a killer or a monster or a demon in the mix, it's a reliable formula. Remember, too, that nudity is the cheapest special effect and it's guaranteed to work every time.
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content